Jump to content

User talk:Omni Flames

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sourcing evaluation

Hello Omniflames.

I have some questions concerning your last message paired with the rejection of my draft for 'Nekkeveld Estate'. We have provided three (in my opinion) reliable sources such as Dutch prominent newspapers (Telegraaf, Algemeen Dagblad) and an article on the website of a governmental institution. What could possibly be wrong with the notability of these sources?

Also, the omission of linking to a Dutch wiki page as source has been corrected.

With kind regards, Douwe Veldhuizen.

Hi Uwactieve. The sources you've added are good, but there are simply not enough of them to show notability. Hopefully that helps! Omni Flames let's talk about it 22:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Best Omni Flames. Please be invited to reconsider declining, for which I've pressed the resubmit button. As you will agree quality is more than quantity. The sources provided are prominent en effective in this part of Europe. Wish Douwe Veldhuizen could show you around like in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yKUrGYZ3d0 from the local RTV Bunschoten. (Be welcome!). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwactieve (talkcontribs) 11:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

England and Wales police commissioner articles

Hi Omni Flames, I noticed you adding orphan tags to the articles. I'll create a navigation template to link them all together in the next couple of days, but I've really had enough for tonight. This is Paul (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay This is Paul, sounds good. Omni Flames let's talk about it 23:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Imelda Marcos. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fried chicken

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fried chicken you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dusapin edit

Hi Omni Flames,

I deleted the link because it contained outdated information: the work has since premiered and I didn't think it made much sense to keep a link that said it "would premiere in May 2016".

However, you're right in that I should have provided a summary of my edit, or at least an argument for the deletion of the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.95.1 (talk) 09:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't read that properly before reverting it. My apologies for that. Omni Flames let's talk about it 09:55, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell S. Jackson

Hello. I submitted the page for Mitchell S. Jackson. I was wondering what parts in particular needed more citations? This is my first time so any help you could give me would be much appreciated.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majestyk99 (talkcontribs) 18:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Majestyk99, I already specifically said which parts need citations, please read my comment on the draft. Omni Flames let's talk about it 21:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

not closed

Hello.

Why did you close the RM discussion on Talk:Edward Frederick Lindley Wood, 1st Earl of Halifax as moved? It has not been moved.

Regards

HandsomeFella (talk) 08:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HandsomeFella. No, it hasn't been moved yet. That's because I don't have the power to move it as Edward Wood, 1st Earl of Halifax already exists and has history. However, I've added a {{db-move}} to the redirect, so that an admin will come along and delete the redirect so that the page can be moved. Hope that clears things up. Omni Flames let's talk about it 08:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. HandsomeFella (talk) 08:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question about feedback

Hi, Omni Flames --

Can you clarify which sources were considered unreliable in the Insureon draft page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Insureon)? Is this a matter of needing a critical mass of reliable sources?

Thank you!

I haven't looked at the reliablity of the sources, all I've seen is that they're bare URLs. Please fix this. Omni Flames let's talk about it 22:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestions

I have just begun work on the Robert F. Gault article. I appreciate your interest and I think I will be able to establish that he meets the notability standard recommended for a Wikipedia article.

Librarianhelen (talk) 01:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Librarianhelen: I believe that it's already shown that he meets the notability standards. Anyway, good luck! Omni Flames let's talk about it 01:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Hi. Please read Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser#Rules_of_use, esp. #4. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Lugnuts, I'll remember that. Thank you. Omni Flames let's talk about it 11:00, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aubrey Smith (athlete), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athletics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fried chicken

The article Fried chicken you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fried chicken for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geology of the Yorkshire coast.

Hello OmniFlames. With regard to the deletion of "The geology of the Yorkshire coast", A visit to the Yorkshire coast has recently been undertaken, and the completion of the article is in prospect. Would you please inform me whether the deleted page is still available. Thank you. Halteres. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halteres (talkcontribs) 18:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Halteres, I think you're looking for WP:REFUND. Omni Flames let's talk about it 23:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
242 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Chicken fingers (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
117 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Omphalitis of newborn (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
90 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B History of Everton F.C. (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
1,375 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B United Parcel Service (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
1,872 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA French cuisine (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
135 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Coxinha (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
168 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Uruguayan cuisine (talk) Please add more sources Cleanup
618 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Yakitori (talk) Please add more content Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
163 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Manakish (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Cleanup
99 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Anticucho (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
1,022 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Dessert (talk) Please add more sources Expand
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Honeysuckle Gelato (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
235 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Panzerotti (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
56 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Hot dog cart (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
1,865 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bread (talk) Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
567 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Bengali cuisine (talk) Please add more sources Merge
74 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Korean taco (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
926 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Crêpe (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Merge
15 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Khanom Tokyo (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Itak Gurgur (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Manuk Napinadar (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Agonum albicrus (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Acroneuria internata (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start 2015–16 Nemzeti Bajnokság I/B (men's handball) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
121 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Pan frying (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kori rotti (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tahri (dish) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
369 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chicken nugget (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
65 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Chicken and mushroom pie (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
88 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Turon (food) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2016)

The Hilton Athens is part of the Hilton Hotels & Resorts hotel chain.
Hello, Omni Flames.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Hilton Hotels & Resorts

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Photodetector • Whirlpool


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:In the news/2016 RD proposal. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June copy-editing blitz has not started yet

Thanks for your copy-edits, but the June blitz does not start until June 12. You are welcome to edit any articles, of course. They just won't count in the blitz yet. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, right. My apologies, I didn't realize. Omni Flames let's talk about it 21:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Nicosia local government units.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2016 News

Hello everyone, welcome to the June 2016 GOCE newsletter. It's been a few months since we sent one out; we hope y'all haven't forgotten about the Guild! Your coordinators have been busy behind the scenes as usual, though real life has a habit of reducing our personal wiki-time. The May backlog reduction drive, the usual coordinating tasks and preparations for the June election are keeping us on our toes!

May drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in last month's record-setting backlog reduction drive. Of the 29 people who signed up, 16 copyedited at least one article, 197 copyedits were recorded on the drive page, and the copyedit backlog fell below 1,500 for the first time! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

June Blitz: this one-week copy-editing blitz will occur from 12 June through 18 June; the themes will be video games and Asian geography.

Coordinator elections: It's election time again; how quickly they seem to roll around! Nominations for the next tranche of Guild coordinators, who will serve a six-month term that begins at 00:01 UTC on 1 July and ends at 23:59 UTC on 31 December, opens at 00:01 UTC on 1 June and closes at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. Voting takes place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June. If you'd like to assist behind the scenes, please consider stepping forward; self-nominations are welcomed and encouraged. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible; remember it's your Guild, and it doesn't run itself!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Baffle gab1978.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT IN RIGHTS SINGAPORE

@Flames I won't show any reference because my writings are of good faith. Singapore is a conservative nation.Senthoora poove (talk) 07:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Senthoora poove: That may be so, but Wikipedia requires that information be verifiable. It doesn't matter if you edit was correct or not, if you want it in the article, you need to back it up with a reliable source. Omni Flames (talk) 07:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Flames I am not interested editing the article anymore . If you can visit Singapore ,please visit.Senthoora poove (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flames please think again ..Singapore is conservative... research please.Senthoora poove (talk) 07:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Senthoora poove: Please read my message above once again. I don't know if Singapore is conservative, and I don't really want to know. If you want to add this information to the article, then you need to add a reference as well. Please see WP:REFB. Thank you, Omni Flames (talk) 07:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Flames I am not being able to find any reliable source to my writings , I have come to known those things by visiting Singapore in December 2015 .Senthoora poove (talk) 07:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC) @@Flames as I have told you before that I am not interested in editing that article and I am also aware of Wikipedia's rules and regulations... Senthoora poove (talk) 07:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you aren't interested in editing that article, then that's it, obviously it won't be added. Also, just because you found this out by visiting Singapore yourself, doesn't mean it's verifiable. Please see WP:NOR. Omni Flames (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Flames thank you but i request you to visit Singapore at least once. See my other edits if you find out any wrong information or against Wikipedia's rules.Senthoora poove (talk) 08:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Flames If you request me i will permanently leave editing Wikipedia articles.Senthoora poove (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Senthoora poove: Let me get this straight. I have no desire nor need to visit Singapore. I don't want you to leave, and I'm not saying that any of your edits have been against any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please, stay, and help contribute to the encyclopedia! We could use more editors like you. You may wish to read Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth as it's very relevant to this situation. If you have any questions or issues, please don't hesitate to ask me! Thanks and good luck, Omni Flames (talk) 08:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

You were in error in removing my edits for KDBN FM.

I am in charge of KKNN, and the information is incorrect and misleading to the public.

My edits were correct and valid.

Please restore them at your earliest convenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.145.255.226 (talk) 23:42, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page mover granted

Hello, Omni Flames. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. When you move a page, please remember to correct double-redirects, make link corrections where necessary, and follow other relevant post-move cleanup procedures. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! Biblio (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools' 2. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hanny's

Hello, Omni Flames.

You recently rejected my article for creation, Hanny's. I was somewhat confused by this since the chain has reliable references in the Arizona Republic, the largest newspaper in the state of Arizona as well as the largest non-national newspaper published by the Gannett Company. I was more puzzled, however, since the chain's former flagship is referenced in broken links on the pages Lescher and Mahoney and National Register of Historic Places listings in Phoenix, Arizona, since (and perhaps most importantly) the former flagship IS an NRHP-listed site (#85002058). In any case, I have edited and resubmitted the article with a direct link to the former flagship's NRHP listing. Since I was met with swift rejection, I anticipate swift approval given the subject's official recognition of historical significance by the federal government. I was just curious about the specifics of the matter.

Thanks, Hisrtoriarvm Arizonensis
Ditat Deus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiarvm Arizonensis (talkcontribs) 13:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Hisrtoriarvm Arizonensis: I've had to decline the submission again since you still haven't listed enough reliable sources. Yes, the sources you've got there are good, but there are simply not enough of them for a solid article here. Hopefully that helps. Omni Flames (talk) 21:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Omni Flames: Alright, that's fine, How many sources do you need? I have no problem searching for additional reliable sources, however this would be much easier if I knew EXACTLY how many I need. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiarvm Arizonensis (talkcontribs) 23:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Historiarvm Arizonensis: There's no specific number of sources you need to show that the subject of the article is notable. You just need enough to prove that the company has been covered by reliable sources enough to warrant it's own encyclopedic article. You may want to see WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. Omni Flames (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Omni Flames: Okay, thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiarvm Arizonensis (talkcontribs) 23:47, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Omni Flames: I've just edited Hanny's and added articles from the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and the Tucson Citizen, all of which are accessible online. I figure that these non-biased references from non-local high profile publications reporting on a matter regarding a national company, Hartmarx, with references to Hanny's establishes it as a notable institution. I hope that this meets your standards. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiarvm Arizonensis (talkcontribs) 00:18, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Claus is a fictional character; It was obviously added as a defacement. Please refrain from reverting changes that you clearly haven't looked at.

Hi,

You recently messaged me about reverting the following change:

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=North%20Pole,%20Alaska&diff=724858520

If you research Santa Claus, you'll see that it is a fictional character. This means that it cannot be a notable resident of a town. Furthermore, Santa Claus is purported to live on the *actual* north magnetic pole of the earth, rather than in North Pole, which is named after the former. So even if a fictional character should be listed under Notable Residents, it would be incorrect to place him in North Pole, AK.

Look back at the change in which Santa Claus was introduced to the article as a notable resident, and you can see that it was an obvious defacement of the article which added another resident of North Pole that clearly was not notable, likely made by the person themselves or an acquaintance of them.

What I have to wonder is why you reverted this. If you had looked at the change even superficially, you would have noticed all of this and left it alone.

I don't mean to be such a buzzkill-- I can appreciate the humour and magic in harmless jokes. But at the same time-- no, I really can't. Wikipedia is serious business and the sanctity of the North Pole, Alaska wikipedia page should be upheld. I went out of my way to do so, and I am annoyed that you went out of your way to undo my work.

// only half joking. ;)