Jump to content

User:Abstract.Absurdism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Abstract.Absurdism (talk | contribs) at 09:00, 15 June 2016 (→Background). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Overview Translations

Date Activity Time Spent Problems
20/04/2016 Zurich Underground Pair 1 45 min Translating directly (Close to the original)
27/04/2016 Zurich Underground Pair 8 1:30 h Adding links
04/05/2016 Zurich Underground Pair 10 1:30 h Certain vocabulary
11/05/2016 Zurich Underground Pair 14 1:30 h Adding references
25/05/2016 Pair 10 & Pair 14 (adding links), Flüchtlingsausweis 1:30 h Adding links
01/06/2016 Creating "Refugee Identity Certificate" page 1:30 h articles, direct translation, certain vocabulary
08/06/2016 Linking "Refugee Identity Certificate" to parent pages & Finished translating "Elephant,..." 1.30 h Finding parent sites
14/06/2016 Kiez-Stories 30 min. Vocab
15/06/2016 Example Example
29/06/2016 Example Example
06/07/2016 Example Example
13/07/2016 Example Example
20/07/2016 Example Example
29/06/2016 Example Example

pair 1 Jana and Annabelle

Zurich Underground

mini|hochkant=1.5|Geplante U-Bahn-Linien (1972)


The Zurich Underground was a project started in the 1970s to build the rapid transit network in the city of Zurich and several bordering municipalities. In the original plan the first line led from Dietikon via Schlieren, Zurich main station, Oerlikon and Opfikon to Zurich airport, including two short branch lines to Schwamendingen and Kloten. The two most important development axes of the agglomeration, Limmattal and Glatttal, would have been joined onto the network. The line would have been 27.5 km long, 14.8 km of which would have been underground. At a later point in time the construction of two more lines was planned. In spite of initial optimism the project was rejected in a referendum by the voters in the Canton of Zurich. As early as the 1st of April 1962, the "Tiefbahn" (rapid transit) project, which would have included the lowering of the Zürich S-Bahn in the city centre by building 21.15 km of underground line, was also rejected in a referendum. Some of the lines, which were built as preliminary work for the Underground that was never realised, are used today as the Milchbuck-Schwamendingen tram tunnel and as the final stop of the Sihltal-Zürich-Uetliberg-Bahn.

pair 8 Jana and Annabelle

[[Datei:Zurich Be 4-4 Karpfen 1416 Bahnhof Enge.jpg|mini|Für den Tunnelbetrieb konzipierte Trams des Typs Be 4/4 («Karpfen»)]] The following tunnel routes were planned:[1]

Wherever possible, an open construction was desirable. Some sections between Zuerich Central and the University, below the Hirschgraben, as well as from Bellevue to Heimplatz, were to be constructed using a mining technique. A direct routing between the main station and Paradeplatz below the middle part of the Bahnhofstrasse was to be avoided due to the great amount of cables, so, along the Rennweg and the western side of St. Peterhofstatt, the mining technique was suggested.[2]


pair 10 Jana and Annabelle

Planungen

Template:BSu-headerTemplate:BSu-tableTemplate:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS4Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2Template:BS2

|}

At first, after the rejection of the Underground project, the authorities were helpless because the result of the referendum did not allow to draw clear conclusions. In 1963, the city council made the architect and interior designer Hans Marti delegate of the newly built office of urban planning. Even though Marti was in favour of underground rail transport, he was very critical of claims to restructure the city in order to make it more car-friendly. He thought it to be illusionary that the tram would disappear from the city in the coming decades.[3] The municipal authorities became convinced that the traffic problems could be solved only by regional planning transcending the city´s territory, in cooperation with the Canton of Zurich and the confederation of Switzerland. In 1963, the council of the Zurich Canton granted a loan of 935 Francs to draft overall plans, which, among several other areas also made the development of the transport network a subject of discussion. The Canton and the City of Zurich, as well as the Swiss Federal Railways implemented a coordinating committee in order to develop the transport plan, which was included in the overall plan.[4]

[[Datei:Hans Künzi.jpg|mini|hochkant|links|Hans Künzi, Präsident der Behördendelegation]] The final report of the committee was presented on the 18th May, 1966. According to this rail-bound means of transport, independent of streets, should carry the main load of the public traffic and one distinguished between coarse, means and fine distributors. As a coarse distributor the existing SBB railroad network was intended, which should open the second suburb belt (from a radius of ten to twelve kilometers of the city centre). In the "Metropolitangebiet" within this radius a(n) conventional underground (of conventional make) would take over the role of the fast central distributor, because buses and trams were not suitable in addition. Rather these should serve as a fine distributor and underground feeder. The tram net should be adapted to the new conditions, concerning the abolition of distances in the city centre, but also the building of new distances in the exterior city accommodations.[5] At the border of the Metropolitangebiets, "contact railway stations" were intended between underground and suburban train; from these the suburban trains should operate without hold up to the city centre. [6]


pair 14 Jana and Annabelle

In the run-up to the referendum it had been inquired to ask (consider) question of the construction of the underground and S-Bahn separately. In fact, the S-Bahn was largely undisputed, while the underground caused a socio-political debate. Especially exponents of the SP were against the (what they called it) "project of the great Madness". As a result of the underground construction they feared rising land prices, higher rents and the decrease of apartments, which would be used up by office spaces. This lead to a displacement of the residents of the city to the villages and ultimately to longer routes to their respective work places. The opponents furthermore considered the cost of the underground as "astronomically high". The Advocates argued that the underground is a project of environmental protection. Additionally they ensured that a large number of accompanying measures had been taken to maintain and encourage urban living spaces. Their argument that without the underground there would be danger of a "traffic gridlock", didn't work, especially as the economic cooled down and the number of inhabitants of the city of Zurich declined again slightly.[7][8]


On 20. May 1973 the people had to decide at the cantonal level on <<the decision of the Cantonal Council on the granting of a loan for the expansion of public transport in the Zurich region>>. Meant was the start of the financial participation of the Canton of Zurich on underground construction, where 599,2 million Swiss francs were to be approved. In addition to this, in the city of Zurich a decision had to be made on the template "Expansion of public transport (construction and financing of a underground and the S-Bahn, founding treaty)". It included the municipal participation in the construction of the metro and a small part of the S-Bahn and the founding treaty of the "transport companies in the Zurich Region" (VRZ). This was a further 545,5 million francs. The VRZ, in which the city of Zurich, as well as the communities Dietikon, Kloten, Opfikon and Schlieren are involved, would be an extension of the transport companies Zurich, including the underground operation.[9] Would both templates have been adopted, then the federal would have made his contribution on the S-Bahn construction. It was not, however: at an above-average participation of 64.2 %, the cantonal template with 234'320 to 177'362 Voices (56,92% No)[10] rejected; only 34 of 170 municipalities agreed. Even more clearly failed the urban template with 50'114 to 123'210 Voices (71,09% No). SP-cantonal council of Franz Schumacher said the referendum was a rejection of the unbridled economic growth and said that the no could only been applied to the U-Bahn.[11]



Refugee Identity Certificate

The term refugee identity is usually a synonym for the travel document for refugees.

Since 28th January 2016 refugees in the Federal Republic of Germany have received a proof of arrival. If they have filed an asylum application, they also receive residence authorisation. If they are recognised as entitled to asylum they will be granted refugee status and will receive a travel document for refugees and a residence title.

Das Wort Flüchtlingsausweis wird zumeist synonym für den Reiseausweis für Flüchtlinge verwendet.

In der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erhalten Flüchtlinge bei ihrer Ankunft seit 28. Januar 2016 zunächst einen Ankunftsnachweis. Haben sie einen Asylantrag gestellt, erhalten sie zusätzlich eine Aufenthaltsgestattung. Werden sie als asylberechtigt anerkannt oder wird ihnen die Flüchtlingseigenschaft zuerkannt, erhalten sie einen Reiseausweis für Flüchtlinge und einen Aufenthaltstitel.

Refugee Identity Certificate after World War II

After the Second World War, millions of Germans were expelled from their homeland. The survivors took refuge in what is known today as the Federal Republic of Germany (which at that time was divided into four occupation zones) or in other countries.

The Federal Republic of Germany and the GDR were founded in 1949, but their sovereignty was still limited for a long time (see legal status of Germany after 1945).

In the Federal Republic of Germany a passport for displaced persons and refugees was created and the respective status of each individual documented in an admission procedure on arrival.. These were issued in Friedland Refugee Camp; for Soviet zone refugees who came via West Berlin, in a camp in Berlin-Marienfelde.

Nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg wurden Millionen von Deutschen aus ihren Heimatgebieten vertrieben. Die Überlebenden fanden Zuflucht auf dem Gebiet der heutigen Bundesrepublik Deutschland (das in vier Besatzungszonen geteilt war) oder in anderen Ländern.

Die Bundesrepublik und die DDR wurden 1949 gegründet; ihre Souveränität war aber noch lange beschränkt (siehe Rechtslage Deutschlands nach 1945).

In der Bundesrepublik schuf man einen Ausweis für Vertriebene und Flüchtlinge, der den jeweiligen Status dokumentierte; ausgestellt wurden sie im Aufnahmelager Friedland; für Sowjetzonenflüchtlinge, die über West-Berlin kamen, im Aufnahmelager Berlin-Marienfelde, jeweils nach einem Aufnahmeverfahren.


Hintergrund

Ab dem 5. März 2002 strahlte der MDR um 21:30 Uhr in der Reihe „Hierzulande“ 15-minütige Folgen „Elefant, Tiger und Co.“ aus mit dem Zweittitel „Tierzulande“. Insgesamt wurden 12 Folgen gesendet, beginnend mit der ersten Episode „Operationstag im Zoo“ und produziert von DocStation (Buch/Regie: Katrin Völker, Marcus Fischötter).[1][2] Aufgrund des regen Publikumsinteresses übernahm der MDR diese Sendung in Eigenregie und sendete sie ab 1. April 2003 als eigenständiges Format.

Durch die Einbeziehung der Tierpflegerpersönlichkeiten in das Konzept und die Handlung der Serie gilt die Serie als Vorreiter auf dem Gebiet der Zoo-Doku-Soaps. Der Erfolg von Elefant, Tiger & Co. übertraf die Erwartungen des MDR und des Zoos. Mittlerweile wurden mehr als 670 Episoden produziert und ausgestrahlt.

Zunächst wurden 15-minütige, später 25-minütige Episoden für den Mitteldeutschen Rundfunk produziert. Für Nachmittagsprogramm des Ersten wurden Wiederholungen der Fernsehserie in 45-minütige Sendeblöcke geschnitten. Die Ausstrahlung der ersten Staffel dieser Episoden vom 4. Oktober bis zum 23. Dezember 2005 verfolgten durchschnittlich 1,93 Millionen Zuschauer.[3] Die zweite Staffel, welche vom 27. Dezember 2006 bis 5. April 2007 ausgestrahlt wurde, erreichte durchschnittlich 2,64 Millionen Zuschauer.[4]

Die Serie wurde maßgeblich von den beiden Fernsehautoren Jan Tenhaven und Axel Friedrich entwickelt. Inzwischen sind zusätzlich neun weitere Autoren im Wechsel für die Sendung zuständig: Jens Strohschnieder, Kerstin Holl, Antje Schneider, Eva Demmler, Lutz Tauscher, Stefanie Wagemann, Christiane Probst, Beate Gerber und Melanie Henze. Sprecher und — in Sondersendungen — gelegentlich auftretender Akteur ist der Musiker und Schauspieler Christian Steyer. Sein Vertreter ist der Hörspielsprecher Uve Teschner.


Background

From 5th March 2002 the MDR showed 15-minute-episodes of "elephant, tiger and Co." with the second title "Tierzulande" in the series "this country" at 9:30 pm. In total, 12 episodes were aired, beginning with the episode "Operation day in the Zoo" and produced by DocStation (book/Director: Katrin peoples, Marcus otter).[12][13] Due to immense popularity the MDR took over the series themselves and aired it from 1st April 2003 independently.

By including the zookeepers' personalities in the concept and the plot of the series, the series is considered a pioneer in the field of zoo docusoaps. The success of elephant and tiger & Co. exceeded the expectations of both the MDR and the zoo. There have now been more than 670 episodes produced and broadcast.

In the beginning 15-minute, later 25-minute episodes were produced for the Central German Radio . For the afternoon program of "Das Erste" repeats of the television series were cut into 45-minute blocks. The broadcast of the first season was watched by an average of 1.93 million viewers.[14] The second season, which was broadcast from 27. December 2006 to 5. April 2007, reached an average of 2.64 million viewers.[15]

The serial was developed substantially by the two TV writers Jan Tenhaven and Axl Friedrich. By now, there are nine other authors responsible: Jens Straw Schieder, Kerstin Holl, Antje Schneider, Eva Demmler, Lutz Tauscher, Stefanie Wagemann, Christiane Probst, Beate Gerber and Melanie Henze. Speaker and - in special programs - intermittent actor is the musician and actor Christian Steyer. His substitute is the radio drama actor Uve Teschner.

Kiez-Stories

"Kiez-Stories" is a family tv-show that was split in seven parts and produced by Rolf Gumlich and Jens-Peter Proll, which started airing in october 1987 on GDR-Television.

Plot

The episodes focus on the inhabitants of Griseldastreet 9 in Berlin. In different narratives the audience learns stories revolving around the construction worker Matti Wruck, his aunt Marie Klamroth, the cobbler Botte Schulz, the pretty neighbour Eva-Maria Otto and many more.

Kiezgeschichten

Kiezgeschichten ist eine siebenteilige Familienserie von Rolf Gumlich und Jens-Peter Proll, die ab Oktober 1987 im DDR-Fernsehen lief.

Handlung[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Die Episoden ranken sich um die Bewohner der Griseldastraße 9 in Berlin. In mehreren Erzählsträngen, die sich immer wieder berühren, werden Geschichten um den Bauarbeiter Matti Wruck, seine Tante Marie Klamroth, den Schuster Botte Schulz, die hübsche Nachbarin Eva-Maria Otto und viele andere erzählt.

Episoden[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Der Neue aus Nummer 9 Ein ganz besonderer Tag Unter Brüdern Vertrauensbruch Drunter und drüber Heiratsanträge Gehen und Kommen Weblinks[Bearbeiten | Quelltext bearbeiten] Kiezgeschichten in der Internet Movie Database (englisch) Beschreibung der einzelnen Episoden Kategorien: Fernsehserie (Deutschland)

  1. ^ "Schach dem Verkehrs-Chaos" (PDF, 2,8 MB). www.alt-zueri.ch. 1962. Retrieved 2016-01-02. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |kommentar= ignored (help)
  2. ^ Das Projekt einer Tiefbahn für Zürich. Schweizerische Bauzeitung 79/47 (1961), S. 851.
  3. ^ Hans-Rudolf Galliker: Tramstadt. S. 217–218.
  4. ^ Hans-Rudolf Galliker: Tramstadt. S. 220.
  5. ^ Bundesblatt Nr. 39/1972, S. 574–575.
  6. ^ Hans Künzi: Die zukünftige U-Bahn von Zürich. Schweizerische Bauzeitung 88/51 (1970), S. 1194.
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference nzz was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference tramstadt225 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Bundesblatt Nr. 39/1972, S. 573.
  10. ^ Bundesblatt Nr. 39/1972, S. 573.
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference hobmeier12 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ "Elefant, Tiger & Co (MDR)". Retrieved November 02, 2015. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  13. ^ "Elefant, Tiger & Co - Sendetermin-Chronik bei fernsehserien.de". Retrieved November 02, 2015. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  14. ^ Pressemappe der ARD: Zoogeschichten im Ersten. 333 Folgen & mehr..., 2007, S. 4.
  15. ^ Stand: 15. März 2007/Pressemappe der ARD: Zoogeschichten im Ersten. 333 Folgen & mehr..., 2007, S. 5.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:Abstract.Absurdism&oldid=725379542"