User talk:76.102.233.65

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Balanced Ternary

Ah! Thank you for the clarification. TristanLuigi (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to It's All About the Pentiums has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The stupid mouthbreathers, along with the stammers, ruined UseNet! ¡ I would very much like to cap all of the morons meting and the spammers too!

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 0 (year). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.

I observe that this is clearly the same editor who was editing when the warning in the #December 2015 section was issued. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello. Please do not add original research to articles as you apparently did to David Reimer here and here. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.

In addition, detailed technical information about a medical procedure is more appropriate to the article page about the procedure than on a biography article of someone who has undergone the procedure. Please consider adding your modifications there instead.

Finally, your attempts to add this material to the biography of David Reimer have been undone twice for cause. Please familiarize yourself with the three revert rule going forward. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Given that phimosis is not a valid diagnosis before puberty, not mentioning it in the article is censorship:

The impression of the article gives is that e necessary procedure went wrong, when the reality is that the procedure was unnecessary. I even know why doctors do that:

"I have some good friends who are obstetricians outside the military, and they look at a foreskin and almost see a $125 price tag on it. Each one is that much money. Heck, if you do 10 a week, that's over $1,000 a week, and they don't take that much time."
——
Dr.Thomas Wiswell
quoted in "The Age-Old Question of Circumcision"
by Betsy A. Lehman, Boston Globe, June 22, 1987, p. 43

Even though the reason the doctor misdiagnosed phimosis is clearly monetary, given that I cannot get into the head of the avarice quack, I shall drop the sentence about cash-grab, even though that is what it is, but I shall not let censorship stand. If I revert it daily, I shall not be in violation of #R and after a while, the censorers will get tired of censoring. I have the truth on my side that phimosis is not a valid diagnosis before puberty, so have no intention of letting this whitewash stand.

You accuse me of original research, but we have known for decades that most præpucii are incapable of retraction at birth, but capable of retraction by puberty. This is far from original research.

---