User talk:Serial Number 54129
 Archives |
No archives yet.
|
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Loving the humour earlier! Because It made me laugh, here is a barnstar! You have a really good sense of humour. Enjoy! Class455fan1 (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
The Anti-Flame Barnstar | |
| Heated Conflict Not A Problem For You --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| For Abdashtart I (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Guy (Help!) 22:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Hi, thanks for your overall maintenance work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate work you do on various admin boards. We need more editors like you to keep Wikipedia clean. Thanks. -- Human3015 It will rain 18:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar |
| :-) Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC) |
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for your continued diligence and civility  -- samtar talk or stalk 14:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
|
You were right.
and I was wrong. I think you may know what I'm talking about. You were absolutely correct in your assumptions. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers User:78.26. Wasn't sure what you were referring to, as haven't edited for a couple of days, but think I've just found what you mean. Connected to a recent AN/I report, perchance? Thanks for your message in any case. Have a good (remainder of a ) weekend! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are as right now as you were then! . 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Remember the expression, even a stopped clocked is right twice a day! Guess that must be me: appreciate your message mate Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- You are as right now as you were then!
Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Judo do
Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Judo do, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Although the author is going about things the wrong way, and currently seems to have thrown his toys out of the pram, there is a possible subject here and he should be given the chance to develop it if he can. The earlier "hoax" deletions were because of claims that it was an Olympic sport, but this seems to be a real, though doubtfully notable, variant of Judo. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Ed course pages
Hi there! I saw that you marked Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/North Dakota State University/PSYC 480 History and Systems of Psychology (Fall, 2015) for speedy deletion. I've undone this. That page is the on-wiki version of a course page for a course participating in Wiki Education Foundation's Classroom Program. Student editors in these classes are aware that their usernames and wiki activities are public, and we ask instructors to discuss with their students ahead of time the implication of choosing an identifiable or anonymous username. Thanks for looking out for malicious outing, though... it's definitely a problem in other contexts!--Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Sometimes when you look at a case that has been archived but there's no archive link, it's because of the Wikipedia software. All you have to do is use the purge link in your interface if you have one, or use the key combination that does the same thing in your browser. At that point, the link should just pop in and it will look normal. If it doesn't, don't manually edit the page. Instead, let an SPI clerk know of the problem. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers User:Bbb23, I thought I was going mad! I'm sure it wasn't there when I posted that, and yet when I looked back through the history it was there all along! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Inappropriate comments
Could you please stop the unhelpful, inappropriate comments on Talk pages, SPI and the such; especially related to TeaLover1996. I have reverted many of your edits now and it's becoming disruptive. JMHamo (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please desist from refactoring other users' edits. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:34, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Specifically stuff like - [1] JMHamo (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Did you get it? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Specifically stuff like - [1] JMHamo (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to notify you I declined deletion of File:Karanvir Bohra's Signature.png. Signatures do not necessarily generate copyright, see WP:SLP, so this is not clear enough of a case for speedy deletion. You may want to take to WP:FFD for discussion though. Regards, Jujutacular (talk) 17:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jujutacular; it got trashed all the same, 06:19 this morning under G12. Ciao! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Fortuna! Jujutacular (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- I thought it was funny though, because by then it had no tag on it- and hadn't for many hours! Know what I mean? Cheers Jujutacular Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- It was actually re-tagged by another user :) Jujutacular (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Right, thanks!Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:29, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- It was actually re-tagged by another user :) Jujutacular (talk) 17:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- I thought it was funny though, because by then it had no tag on it- and hadn't for many hours! Know what I mean? Cheers Jujutacular Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Fortuna! Jujutacular (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry VI of England may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- became completely unresponsive to everything that was going on around him for more than a year. (Henry may have been suffering from a form of [[schizophrenia]], according to modern authorities, as
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:52, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Done
Hello, I noticed that you deleted my edit. It is just that the ref that is on Hillsborough's article is not only undated, It is also no longer on Sheffield City Councli's Website. Croydon173314 (talk) 15:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
can u please have a look at this page? digvijay and another editor is vandalising this page by continuing to remove valuable informationHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 14:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- You will soon be reported to WP:3RR actually :) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you wish to dispute the content, fine- do so on the talk page in consensus with other editors. You are currently involved in an edit-war, and even if you think you are in the right, that is not how things are done around here! Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- this is ridiculous, why different rules for different pages? please have a look at how much well sourced and important information was removed on karan singh grover page and was called trivial why different rules for this page??Hollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
please have a look at the page I have mentioned, and see how the user digvijay has removed loads of well sourced information and has violated the page? and then conveniently is calling me a vandaliser for kvb's page? it is a requestHollywoodbollywood22 (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Could you give Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine a look over and add it to your watchlist? Paul Austin (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Paul, have done so; the article looks OK to me, or am I blindly missing something? -not an impossibility by any means! I will say that the '"Family curse" section seems not particularly relevant to her personally, but I wouldn't insist. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
- My concern is, that as a number of Wikipedians have pointed out, Germany legally abolished royal and noble titles and styles in 1919, the Grand Duchy of Hesse ceased to exist in 1918 and i doubt that the Hesse-Damstadt family would have provoked the known anti-monarchical Hitler by giving her an overt royal title. Paul Austin (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Good point. It's out of my period I'm afraid but it is rather obvious now you come to mention it. So it should be moved to simply Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine then? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think it should. Feel free to move or edit or change. She was never a Princess of Hesse and by Rhine. This is a relic of monarchist fanboys editing Wikipedia. She was never Princess Johanna. Paul Austin (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Paul- that's done. I guess the monarchists will go mad, if there's any still around. Does this affect any other articles do you know? -I'd expect so, but wouldn't know where to start! Anyone alive after 1919??? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: from what i've seen, a lot of living German and Austrian members of former royal, grand ducal and princely families have Wikipedia articles calling them by titles which ceased to exist after WWI. Again, monarchists at work. Both Germany and Austria have not had royal and noble titles since c. 1919. Paul Austin (talk) 16:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- I think it should. Feel free to move or edit or change. She was never a Princess of Hesse and by Rhine. This is a relic of monarchist fanboys editing Wikipedia. She was never Princess Johanna. Paul Austin (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Good point. It's out of my period I'm afraid but it is rather obvious now you come to mention it. So it should be moved to simply Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine then? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- My concern is, that as a number of Wikipedians have pointed out, Germany legally abolished royal and noble titles and styles in 1919, the Grand Duchy of Hesse ceased to exist in 1918 and i doubt that the Hesse-Damstadt family would have provoked the known anti-monarchical Hitler by giving her an overt royal title. Paul Austin (talk) 16:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
I undid the page move as the reasoning behind it is a clear violation of Wikipedia's policy for no original research: regardless of whether she was legally entitled to it or not, she did use the title of "Princess" and it is definitely part of her common name. German (non-)royals are even still using it today.Cebr1979 (talk) 18:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- You do not know what you are talking about. What they self-identify as is irrelevant. Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- No, it's not. Please review.Cebr1979 (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is to be discussed on the article's talk page, not here. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- No, it's not. Please review.Cebr1979 (talk) 19:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Reply to trolling
Sorry... do you think you can 'ban' people from your talk and carry on posting on others? Grow up. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 06:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Trolling this TP
Excellent work. We may have to nuke it from orbit though. Have a biscuit. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- lolz etc Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- I knew I knew you from somewhere. I've had so much fun with Jeremy today, while making a point I believe is right, but I'll stop now. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 23:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thank you
@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Thank you for being here for me. I've been given an off-wiki tongue lashing and been told I have to give Johanna the title of "Princess" and style of Her Grand Ducal Highness, neither of which she legally held, especially when you take into account the famously anti-Second Reich Hitler regime. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well I think you're fighting the good fight Paul. Not that it should be a fight at all, but these monarchist-types are blinkered beyond recovery. They all want to live in the Middle Ages eh; I had one of them pissing over my TP the other day too. Anyway I personally suggests that whatever happens off-Wiki stays off wiki; they should sling it. Keep up the good work. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I removed that on purpose. A sinebot of my signature isn't necessary for the edit that marked the discussion as resolved. I think you just reverted it by mistake (no big deal, it happens); I just wanted to give you a heads up and let you know :-) ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 16:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- No worries User:Oshwah, just in case archive bot has problem without a time stamp. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:29, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Vandalism
Sorry for the things I've done in Colin Baker page. My purpose wasn't vandalism. I do translates from English to Turkish in trwiki, you can check this page. You can see my working pages like this in this my page. I've done nearly 45 translate and another ones are coming too. I was working on the Doctors' companions in the TV-series Doctor Who and I'm using my phone, not computer. Because of some reasons I don't know, my change in trwiki page suddenly became in enwiki page. I didn't want to do anything like vandalism. Have a nice day. Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) Lmattdavidsmithl (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jawad Botmeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
¿Why?
Sorry, ¿why you deleted my message?.... it was incoherent.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ulof4 (talk • contribs)
Karanvir Bohra
an edit war is going on that page, I was wondering if you could resolve it? the user digvijay seems biased towards the page, he/she has removed information from pages of his contemporaries but gets upset when the same is happened to this page! Don 05:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turehnde (talk • contribs)
- Ha! Maybe need to put a File:Anti.svg over that. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Right! Yes in matters of socks, precision is probably required! How do I use the .svg file, DMacks? Cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded it as File:No socks.png. Works equally well for the WP context and those who are barefoot. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Many thanks! I was well proud of myself too, getting it centred, new text and all! Live and learn eh Cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- I uploaded it as File:No socks.png. Works equally well for the WP context and those who are barefoot. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Right! Yes in matters of socks, precision is probably required! How do I use the .svg file, DMacks? Cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Ha! Maybe need to put a File:Anti.svg over that. DMacks (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
So reverting
My changes to omallur were restructuring.... You accidentally reverted everything Blisspop 13:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rortosthanos (talk • contribs)
- Not accidentally, I assure you. PLease provide reliable sources for any material you add. And please remember to sign your bloody comments. Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:23, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't see why you can't respond in a polite way. Blisspop 15:59, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- What do you find impolite? And who the hell is Bisspop? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Once again-the word 'bloody' doesn't need to be used and blisspop is my hat for all it matters to you Blisspop 17:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well; if you used ~~~~ to sign your sodding posts, I wouldn't have to ask. Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment
Every so often I see you post an inscrutable comment. What is this supposed to mean? HighInBC (was Chillum) 15:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- HighInBC ...just sometimes better than confrontation. In that particular case, I wondered how the editor would respond. I'm not pro extremes of religion myself (or, realistically, religion at all); but if you look at some of his Userboxes, you might see what I mean. Examples: "This user is totally anti islam," "This user thinks psychopaths only use religion as pretext in order to fight," and "This user is for Race purity but is not racist," all seem unnecessarilly provocative and not sitting easilly within the framework of assuming good faith. Thanks for message: inscrutable = under-used word of the week! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:50, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Your comment makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for explaining. HighInBC (was Chillum) 16:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Cheers! In your professional opinion do you think they're suitable? (Re. perhaps a future WP:UfD?) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Your comment makes a lot more sense now. Thanks for explaining. HighInBC (was Chillum) 16:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- No I don't think they are suitable. A deletion discussion may be productive, though perhaps just asking them to take them down fist may be enough. HighInBC (was Chillum) 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Right, will do. Thanks! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:12, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- No I don't think they are suitable. A deletion discussion may be productive, though perhaps just asking them to take them down fist may be enough. HighInBC (was Chillum) 16:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
@HighInBC:, I attempted to raise the issue of the userboxes twice (here and here- both messages delated (as vandalism), a message banning me from his talk (so end of discussion, such as it was), and even an attempt to take me to AN/I (although only an attempt). So... how does one initiate an MfD for other editors' UBs? Can't find a straight forward guide to nominating a private userbox?
Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a new user. I suspect that ANI may just handle this as a behavioural problem rather than a content issue. HighInBC (was Chillum) 14:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice Chillum... on a lighter note, when I saw you post under the modern moniker I thought you were a (new) user to liked get high in BC...
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've always thought Chillum was a toker.-Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Around here, it would probably count as medicinal usage! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- I've always thought Chillum was a toker.-Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 16:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your advice Chillum... on a lighter note, when I saw you post under the modern moniker I thought you were a (new) user to liked get high in BC...
- I don't think this is a new user. I suspect that ANI may just handle this as a behavioural problem rather than a content issue. HighInBC (was Chillum) 14:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Friendly Notice.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.- Signed,
- NotAlpArslan (talk) 08:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC).
Please stop posting in my user page
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please to stop writing in user page, amically,
thank you
signed
NotAlpArslan (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC).
- For the record, Fortuna has never posted on your User page. You must stop your silly behaviour or face banning from the project imho. Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 11:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: your repeating baiting of this user is not constructive. Please stay away from them and their talk page, okay? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please note that user is now blocked / UP blanked / and the cretinious ANI report dismissed with a boomerang. Thank goodness I didn't take your advice. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- User:MSGJ, no disrespect, but I advise you to keep well out of this. Defending this editor will not cover you with glory. It is not 'baiting' (whatever that is, outside of a playground). You would of course know that if you looked just slightly deeper into the situtation. Sorry to be robust, but I find your unfounded remarks extremely offensive. Thanks. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Agree with Fortuna totally. Look at the history, there isn't much. -Roxy the dog™ (Resonate) 13:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#User_by_the_name_of_ProKro_using_an_untolerable_language
- Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive899#Clear_vandalism_by_Kintetsubuffalo
Howvto use
Wiki Rehan Qasim Kumbher (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Not vandalism
Hi there Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Thanks for your work patrolling. Please don't use the vandalism template for edits that are not vandalism, like you did here. There's a specific template for advert edits: {{Uw-advert1}}, and it's offered by Twinkle. If you're not finding what you need on the Twinkle selections, there's more options available at Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- do wot That character whose username you suggested showed a CoI has already changed it once already. Fucking classic:
Being discussed with the user. I hope!!! All the best, cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 10:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- What happens to these is they go in the holding pen and get checked again in a week or two to see what they are up to. The vast majority (over 99 per cent) cease editing when they are made aware of the policy. Any who persist get blocked. I wish the folks doing the renaming would be a little more careful and make sure the new username does not also violate policy. Alas -- Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Indeed Diannaa. Thanks too for pointing out that error and also for direction to that template page, very useful! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- What happens to these is they go in the holding pen and get checked again in a week or two to see what they are up to. The vast majority (over 99 per cent) cease editing when they are made aware of the policy. Any who persist get blocked. I wish the folks doing the renaming would be a little more careful and make sure the new username does not also violate policy. Alas -- Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Username
I have to compliment you on the most awesome username I've come across at Wikipedia. My hat's off to you! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Dan. It makes me look cultured... but really I just used to like the Old Spice advert. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Piss off, cretin. 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC) You're very quick with the templates. How about some original thought? Can you explain what were the "bizarre unsourced alterations" that you think we are edit-warring about? 77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Are you unable to answer my question?77.130.195.17 (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish general election, 1977, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish general election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi - looks like you are very quick off the mark! You undid some of my work while I was still adding information, and then you undid some more of it while I was hunting down a reliable reference. A bit more patience would have saved us both a bit of time and effort. I've added three reliable sources to the Tottenham link now - they're everywhere, and it would have been far easier to check that rather than risking an edit war. I can add more if you like. Next time, waiting more than a handful of minutes before reverting would be advisable, and refraining from shouting would be nice. PS - did you really think that someone could confuse the Tottenham Marshes and Welsh Marches? Grutness...wha? 00:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Well; at least you learnt, Grutness... shame it took multiple reversions for you to do so. Ciao. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Miss Nobody (American murder victim) ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Mundi how do you do?
Just wanted to say hi! Hope u are keeping well and like a bell.
Take a look at this poem!!!!!
The Owl and the Pussy-cat went to sea In a beautiful pea green boat, They took some honey, and plenty of money, Wrapped up in a five pound note. The Owl looked up to the stars above, And sang to a small guitar, 'O lovely Pussy! O Pussy my love, What a beautiful Pussy you are, You are, You are! What a beautiful Pussy you are!'
Pussy said to the Owl, 'You elegant fowl! How charmingly sweet you sing! O let us be married! too long we have tarried: But what shall we do for a ring?' They sailed away, for a year and a day, To the land where the Bong-tree grows And there in a wood a Piggy-wig stood With a ring at the end of his nose, His nose, His nose, With a ring at the end of his nose.
'Dear pig, are you willing to sell for one shilling Your ring?' Said the Piggy, 'I will.' So they took it away, and were married next day By the Turkey who lives on the hill. They dined on mince, and slices of quince, Which they ate with a runcible spoon; And hand in hand, on the edge of the sand, They danced by the light of the moon, The moon, The moon, They danced by the light of the moon. Blisspop (talk) 17:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 23:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!
 (Charles R. Knight, 1922)
|
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 03:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding
{{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included. |
 (Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)
|
Happy New Year, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi
Peppy Paneer (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! Welcome the 2016. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2016 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2016 go well for you.
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:28, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
I am not trying to get myself banned from on Wikipedia's articles, but I have to ask: How am I vandalizing the 2016 Istanbul bombing, if the infobox incorrectly states it occurred in 2014? Thanks, and have a good day! --PootisHeavy (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: I just saw the mistake corrected. Thanks!
- @User talk:PootisHeavy... sorry about that Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Name
Have to congratulate you on your clever choice of name. ~ P-123 (talk) 16:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Whether it is an appropriate name I cannot comment! ~ P-123 (talk) 16:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you! Not particularly at the moment, but I'm hoping it will tempt fate cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you! Not particularly at the moment, but I'm hoping it will tempt fate
Recent edits
Hi there.
I'm a little confused over a couple of your recent edits - Talk:Masturbation and Club International[2] seem to be somewhat out of line? Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
HI
Hello, I don't see how is that important for Belarus as a country. It looks to me as just another western agenda. Wikipedia has to be independent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisterZarkovic (talk • contribs) 17:34, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Malformed electioneering not relevant to Belarussians? Interesting, if bizarre, perspective. Could you also please sign your posts with ~~~~. I enk yow. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:38, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- I just don't think it has to be one of the first things to see on that page. At least it should be moved from top. Just trying to be neutral. Thanks User talk:AlisterZarkovic —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Reversing Edits
I was adding links to Thomas Percy, 1st Baron Egremont. How is that an unnecessary alteration? Furthermore, how was consensus established when it hasn't been discussed?Chchn (talk) 20:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thanks to God.is not thanks God
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I just to be thankful，thanks to God.mayby “thanks God haha”is wrong mind，so I change，please forgive me，and Fortuna（you） misunderstand my mind.say “...not for very long, perhaps...”so please delete，I cant delete.
Qed237 said“Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Qed237, you may be blocked from editing.” Qed237 said
so please you delete“...not for very long, perhaps...” you misunderstand my mind.mayby “thanks God haha”let you think I am a bad men?haha,it is really mistake.I am happy,Because the thing is over.I have depression you know.I was very friendly, just afraid of injury,and afraid of injury anybody you and me......I am happy very happy everyone is ok!I think you are the same to me,right? thanks to God. Adsafe (talk) 15:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Qed237 is very very very afraid to delete your edit,alas...
I am very happy to get your help but.......they are free，right？I think you can know what I say.you will be the best wiki men always（come on!）.Adsafe (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
and I am sorry to modify it always.I am a depressed patient.I am afraid of injury you， so I must do my best and perfect letter to you.and because this my edit always again and again.so sorry please fogive me. Adsafe (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
UPDATE: Sock now [3] Blocked by User:Huon Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
"My" threats are not cretinous
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
They have plenty of io, dean
Badoom, tish! 92.54.161.242 (talk) 19:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- But no-one gives a fuck. As you have had somewhat succintly demonstrated before you. Ciao Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
What the hell man?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[4] Fine I won't help you guys out if you don't care...even so, was there really any need to be so rude? 78.40.158.50 (talk) 07:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- I refer you to the remarks I made to you above. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 07:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- You emailed it yet? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Try to be a bit more serious, thanks
Look, could I recommend you pleaee start acting a bit like a serious user? Suggesting others to mail their colon is not particularly serious, nor is suggesting that anyone who reported your disruptive buddy be banned just because, well, because you want them to be banned. It becomes especially ridiculous when you want to ban users for a month just for having posted in an ANI discussion where you yourself has posted more frequently than some of them. Jeppiz (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- If you have investigated your case against FLCC and presented it as thoroughly as you presented that one, you'd be begging for an award of punishment :D you've randomly found a diff without having a clue about context. A word of advice: that way ^ the boomerangs fly :D ciao Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Actually there is plenty of context. You have a very long pattern of dropping in silly comments in situations where they are not helpful and this is but one example out of many. I echo what Jeppiz says and ask you to stop making silly little comments everywhere, they add heat to situations without adding anything useful. I assure you that any boomerang will fly in an oddly straight direction in this situation. HighInBC 16:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Actually I'd like to know why that AN/I remark was out of place? I was deadly serious in my response to FLCC's offer. And am certainly not the one tying up thousands of bytes on that page :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 January 2016
- Obviously none then. Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:02, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- Actually I'd like to know why that AN/I remark was out of place? I was deadly serious in my response to FLCC's offer. And am certainly not the one tying up thousands of bytes on that page :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (talk • contribs) 16:46, 18 January 2016
- Actually there is plenty of context. You have a very long pattern of dropping in silly comments in situations where they are not helpful and this is but one example out of many. I echo what Jeppiz says and ask you to stop making silly little comments everywhere, they add heat to situations without adding anything useful. I assure you that any boomerang will fly in an oddly straight direction in this situation. HighInBC 16:44, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Hi, thanks for your overall maintenance work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate work you do on various admin boards. We need more editors like you to keep Wikipedia clean. Thanks. -- Human3015 It will rain 18:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
Your note Regarding assuming good faith
Since you seem to have appointed yourself my better [5], kindly explain to me where I went wrong in eventually assuming bad faith in Qed237 (talk · contribs), who is someone who repeatedly edit warred with me, without any explanation of what they were doing or why, and whose only interaction with me was an increasing level of warnings and threats? I explained my actions at every stage, I opened discussions, I did everything asked of me, and the end result, as you can see, is that none of my changes to the article have actually happened - even though most of them appear to be entirely uncontroversial, and not even Qed237 objects to them being done. He made a series of completely unjustified reverts, just because he objected to one small part of my changes. If I am not allowed to assume bad faith in those circumstances, might you permit me to assume he is simply incompetent? Now, with that said, I'm off to make those edits yet again, and finally, someone will have actually improved Wikipedia by turning a shit article into a less shit one. Rabono26 (talk) 19:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Do as I say and not as I do? CassiantoTalk 22:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Rather hypocritical I think: since it was a direct response to you. However, more importantly, since you "banned" me from your TP, what exactly do you think gives you the right to troll mine? The answer, if you're unaware, is none. Ciao! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- That seemed a satisfactory response! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.39.212.59 (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:24, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Starring
Hello, there's currently a discussion here and I need your opinion on it. This is related to that Titanic discussion you were in a few months ago. Thanks. -- Wrath X (talk) 03:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello (2). I have now found some material on my talk page that I think is some references that you were referring to, which I can see you have provided in good faith, but what you have sent relates to Old Buckenham which is a neighbouring parish, and aspects of the history of New Buckenham that are unrelated to the material I am trying to post. please don't be offended but could I ask if you have read the material I tried to post, in the revised and sourced/ referenced version?... are you an official editor - how does this work ? thanks Observer900 (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your message, if it is from you, you have said you have provided a wealth of information, can you please let me know where you have put it, how will I receive what you have sent ? I am trying to be collegiate by trying to 'talk' with the person who keeps deleting my input but they do not reply ? Observer900 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, can you please explain why you have deleted my edit on this page, the material I have shown has sources and referencing displayed. are you an official editor, could you please explain ??, thanks.... Observer900 (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Observer900: I have already replied to you at User talk:Charlesdrakew. Although this discussion should be taking place on your own talk page, not others'! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
you have deleted an edit, please explain what you mean in your comment ?, I suspect you don't know this place, my sources are accurate, the wording is factually correct, could you please explain why you completely deleted what I carefully entered ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Observer900 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- If you continue to make edits without providing reliable, secondary independant sources, then they will be continuously reverted. You have been told this now multiple times by different editors; and I for one am heartilly sick of having the same discussion over and over. Since you seem incapable of listening to or taking advice, I see no profit to either of us in continuing this converstaion. I consider this topic closed. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
3RR warnings
Hi - before you report someone to AN3, please be sure to give them a 3RR warning using {{uw-3rr}}. The user you reported is new, and I can't block him for 3RR when he only got a level 3 unsourced content warning. It's not the same, and we can't assume the newbies know that we have a 3RR policy. I've warned him appropriately now, so if he reverts after this he has no excuse. I didn't say this in my close, but both edit-warring editors should have been warned and reported, not just the new one. Thanks for the report, and let us know if it continues. :-) Katietalk 18:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Trolling from User:Shivam8540
So you deleted the full edit without a second thought. Cool, you might be a real idiot.
I'll make changes more appropriately this time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam8540 (talk • contribs)
I'm not sure what you want me to do. Is there something I can help with? — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:07, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the editor has been blocked now. But I thought you might like to revert our discussion as a) it wasn't very friendly, and b) not very pleasant for him to return to when he was helpless to do anything about it. Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Need your advice
I am taking very seriously your warning but I need to know something. If a user post something unsourced, can I at least tag the unsourced section? What if the user claims that the edit is sourced but refuses to give any explanation in the Talk page. Is it edit-warring if I keep tagging? Silvio1973 (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I understand your point. But I honestly have to say that if someone reported you both now, there would probably be a couple of 24-hour blocks handed out! The other editor should be careful too. Any admin going through that history- well, it just shows a couple of editors edit-warring every day, going away; eating; sleeping; waking up; then coming back to do the same thing all over again! Remember, too, that {{cn}} templates etc ''are'' also subject to 3RR. C'mon! This really needs sorting out mate.Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, in this case let's take a rest. At the end of the day it is not worth it. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- What happened to this, by the way? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Nothing, the conduct of the user was acknowledged by an administrator as problematic but not enough for treatment at ANI. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is still something I do not understand. We have a user (Tuvixer) who kept posting unsourced material and another one (Silvio1973) who cn tagged the unsourced material. Now you might say that both those users were edit-warring. Well, the point is that Tuvixer was questioned by two users [[6]] about the missing sourcing but did not give any explanation. Hence, can we really speak of edit warring? Don't you think that in this case it would be more appropriate to say that one user is pushing unsourced material refusing to explain why? Silvio1973 (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- If it was me, I'd consider the previous ANI report prematurely closed. If there is a pushing of an agenda. But maybe WP:NPOVN? That will draw other editors into the discussion; at the moment, it seems that anything will lead to an edit-war! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is an RfC going on, let's not mix things. However please note this is a crazy situation. I don't know what to do. I cannot edit the lead because allegedly the object of the modification is not sufficiently developed in the body of the article, but if I try to touch the body of the article Tuvixer removes the material. This is the proof:[[7]] Please mind well that I supported my edit with many sources and I am ready to add more sources and material, if only I was given the possibility to touch the article. There is a clear issue of WP:OWN going on here. Silvio1973 (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Silvio, why don't you present the changes you want to make, to the article body, on the Talk page of the article, so everyone can see them and discuss them. It is fair that such changes can be discussed and, that all parties can in the end contribute to the article, not just you. I have suggested this many times before, but always when I do so you ignore my advice. It is really hard to work with a user who ignores what he does not like.
- Also on the ANI you can see that another user has accused you for disruptive editing, and he has stated that you do that often. Tnx --Tuvixer (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, the only disruptive user is you. The proof is that you follow me. I don't follow you. Silvio1973 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is an RfC going on, let's not mix things. However please note this is a crazy situation. I don't know what to do. I cannot edit the lead because allegedly the object of the modification is not sufficiently developed in the body of the article, but if I try to touch the body of the article Tuvixer removes the material. This is the proof:[[7]] Please mind well that I supported my edit with many sources and I am ready to add more sources and material, if only I was given the possibility to touch the article. There is a clear issue of WP:OWN going on here. Silvio1973 (talk) 19:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- If it was me, I'd consider the previous ANI report prematurely closed. If there is a pushing of an agenda. But maybe WP:NPOVN? That will draw other editors into the discussion; at the moment, it seems that anything will lead to an edit-war! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- There is still something I do not understand. We have a user (Tuvixer) who kept posting unsourced material and another one (Silvio1973) who cn tagged the unsourced material. Now you might say that both those users were edit-warring. Well, the point is that Tuvixer was questioned by two users [[6]] about the missing sourcing but did not give any explanation. Hence, can we really speak of edit warring? Don't you think that in this case it would be more appropriate to say that one user is pushing unsourced material refusing to explain why? Silvio1973 (talk) 19:32, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Nothing, the conduct of the user was acknowledged by an administrator as problematic but not enough for treatment at ANI. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- What happened to this, by the way? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Well, in this case let's take a rest. At the end of the day it is not worth it. --Silvio1973 (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Harry Potter children's film list
| WP:DENY |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
To back Dcasey98 up, this is an editing notice posted at the top of the page, therefore I'm deleting Harry Potter from the page too: "PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings or are marketed to teens/adults. In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2016 (UTC) Please explain to me what you are doing right by posting films that violet the criteria of being a children's film to this list. They don't qualify. I'm following the rules. You're not. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
"PLEASE NOTE BEFORE ADDING ITEMS TO THIS LIST: Do not add films which carry teen/adult ratings In the case of films which carry a pre-teen rating, such as the MPAA's G rating or the BBFC's PG rating, please note these are only content guidance ratings that indicate suitability for children and in most cases do not indicate whether children are the primary audience" Other films with a PG-13, like The Golden Compass, should therefore be removed as well. Bellatrix2017 (talk) 14:44, 16 March 2016 (UTC) |
Why are you deleting relevant information?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
What are you doing and why? I am adding good content and you guys are just deleting it as if you don't want new info in the article!! Please stop deleting info. Instead contribute information or give proper structure to the page but please stop just deleting. Just deleting is not any kind of contribution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:24, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi will now refer K Sikdar to Isambard Kingdom's edit summary. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:30, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
What is wrong?
You are behaving like some wiki mafia!! You guys are just deleting new info! Please stop imposing your opinion and check the correctness of info we are adding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 15:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
ANEW
I was the reporter, not reported. The actions of others stepping in to revert the edit-warrior made the complaint moot, so I rescinded it. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 23:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
I wasn't making test edits. I changed "Neither the bacchanal that takes place in the third episode nor the explicit romance between Vera and Lombard, which never got physical in the novel", which is an incomplete sentence and does not make a lot of sense, to the grammatically correct "The bacchanal that takes place in the third episode does not happen in the book, nor the explicit romance between Vera and Lombard, who never got physical in the novel." -- Noneofyourbusiness (talk) 05:55, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you :-)
I just wanted to thank you for watching over my talk page while I was away from Wikipedia and for starting the ANI thread. I get these kinds of messages all the time; it's completely normal to me ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 12:17, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (William Harrington (knight)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating William Harrington (knight), Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!
Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for writing the article about Sir Billy as he might have been known to his friends and familiy. Do you find the coat of arms or any other picture that could be added to the article?
To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
| WP:DENY |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Your edit on Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751CHi, can you stop reverting the the page, Alstom Metropolis & Shanghai Electric C751C because it was true that 9 trainsets is good. Don't revert it again. If you revert, we will blocked you from editing as your userpage taken down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.66.229.67 (talk) 13:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |
ANI case
A case has been filed at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Dcasey98_reported_by_User:Betty_Logan_.28Result:_.29 in which you are involved should you wish to comment. Betty Logan (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
I see that you're repeatedly removing the bold formatting (the ''' markup) from around the article title in the lead of this article. Our formatting convention is that we generally format article titles in such a way.
If you think that the article titles should not be formatted like this, then please start a discussion as to why not on the article's Talk: page. Don't just revert it, that's seen as WP:EDIT WARRING and is strongly discouraged here. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:33, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note it was consequential to a mass-reversion of IP sock-puppetry, as per WP:DENY. Unfortunately, as you know, Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 10:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wow. Did you really just say that? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is used metaphorically today, of course. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- But all the same, if you're out-of-state and you're likely Chinese (or just living in a country with a large Chinese population) you're all just the same and to be treated as if you're all in cahoots? Wow. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- I assumed you were speaking hypothetically, since you hadn't had the courtesy to inform me I was being discussed. I now realise you just didn't understand. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:14, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- But all the same, if you're out-of-state and you're likely Chinese (or just living in a country with a large Chinese population) you're all just the same and to be treated as if you're all in cahoots? Wow. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- It is used metaphorically today, of course. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wow. Did you really just say that? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello there. :) You reverted my removal of a template from Richard Caring. Can you tell me how one can tell it is autobiographical? So I can learn. Thanks in advance. Juicebaby (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| :-) Adamstraw99 (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC) |
- Whatever I did to earn that, Adamstraw99- thanks very much! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
you are not an administrator
Please mind your own business. You are not an administrator. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K Sikdar (talk • contribs) 10:58, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
No??? 
Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:02, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
| That rather seems to have settled that. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
I don't know what your game is, but one minute you're bulk reverting real editors as "socks" and the next you're adding nonsense about London running trolleybuses in 1972. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
|
Pings
Hi. Just to let you know that this won't work, because pings only work if they're done correctly at the time the comment is signed and saved. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Revert
| Bocked edit-warrior. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
RevertHi Truth should trump (talk) 19:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC) RevertI have given reference and explained in talk page Truth should trump (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2016 (UTC) |
Truth should trump
Editor was blocked at exactly the same time as your AN3 filing. Thanks for filing the report anyway - much appreciated. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Great minds eh? Cheers for info Chesnaught555. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Most definitely! No problem at all. :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
the person awarding me a Jimmy Saviile barnstar
this person calling me Jimmy Savile should be actionable, shouldn't it? Its legally defamation. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- On the assumption that they don't think you'd be good on the radio mate... I should say almost definitely yes! Where? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The person who has been doing that has been all over the place over time. I got that piece of garbage maybe 4–6 months ago. On top of anything else, you can have a revdel on that stuff. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- It wasn't exactly an original change of name was it... Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) The person who has been doing that has been all over the place over time. I got that piece of garbage maybe 4–6 months ago. On top of anything else, you can have a revdel on that stuff. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
OK, problem here: although a few genealogies seem to make him a knight, Horrox says "although he was never knighted" (my emphasis), so we need a different title for the article. Maybe Christopher Conyers (bailiff), since his office as bailiff of the liberty of Richmond seems to be the principal one he held? Choess (talk) 17:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yep. Christopher Conyers of Hornby, Lancashire; Sir Christopher Conyers of Sockburn. Good catch! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 17:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- (forgot to ping, @Choess: ) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Are you OK with the proposed title? I can move it and clean up the redirect. Also, I hope you don't mind citation templates; I used Template:Cite ODNB for the ODNB article, which I thought looked a bit neater than the bare URL. Choess (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- No worries about the bare refs, the fact that I use them is purely reflective of the fact I -don't - know- how- to do it your way! May I suggest the dab is along the lines of (feudal bailiff) or (bailiff of Richmond): purely because bailiff on its own, I think, has a rather different connotation today? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Are you OK with the proposed title? I can move it and clean up the redirect. Also, I hope you don't mind citation templates; I used Template:Cite ODNB for the ODNB article, which I thought looked a bit neater than the bare URL. Choess (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
rollback
Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katietalk 21:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Received / understood. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie. On the case. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
FYI
This is a duplicate warning. They only made one edit to that page. I'm sure this user will get blocked if they keep vandalizing, but I wouldn't want some admin at AIV to delay it because of improper warnings. Just sayin'... - theWOLFchild 23:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Thomas Harrington (knight) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Lancastrian, Battle of Northampton and William Harrington
- Fine rolls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Fine
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Done Many thanks. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Cebr1979
I don't want to continue there, esp. since they can't respond--but whether the original misreading was innocent or not, the battlegroundish commentary they build on it it was not. Besides, consider how much they had to be browsing through my history or ANI before they found it (I have had very limited interactions with Flyer, I think): that also is seriously troubling. Drmies (talk) 14:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Fair point; and such deep-water trawling does suggest an absolute intention at finding something (indeed, anything!) to use. Carry on! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. Such blocks make me sad, though: editors who could otherwise do good work dig themselves into a hole and keep digging. Drmies (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
At Cebr1979's talk you have stated the interpretation "could be valid, according to the link". Please re-read the claim and the link because the link does not support the claim. The qualification in the comment is what a person subject to stalking would say if they wanted to obscure any trails that may lead to their identity. If someone I had rarely interacted with asked me if I am the same person as John Smith at Facebook, I may suggest I could be because I'm not going to enter into a 20-questions game to provide information about my identity—that in no way suggests I would therefore create sockpuppets at Wikipedia. The claim is totally bogus and it should be removed from the page as it is completely without evidence, yet is stated confidently with a link the gullible may accept, and therefore is the start of a smear. Johnuniq (talk) 00:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that's certainly one interpretation- cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 03:29, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Rona Ambrose is a pro-life feminist
Hello Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi,
You have recently reverted an edit on Pro-life feminism claiming that the information was unsourced. There were 4 sources in the article alone, and several more on the talk page. Please undo your reversion as there were many sources afterall. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 19:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- I appreciate the point, and the work you are doing. Unfortunately, however, it is not the number of sources per article that is relevant, but sources per assertion. The assertion you made, whilst possibly true, needs verification. May I point you to the essay, which is rather apposite at this juncture, WP:VNT- for Wikipedia, verifiabilty is more important than an abstract truth, or a belief in such a truth. Also, it is worth pointing out that the assessment of these sources as reliable rests not on individual editors, but on the consensus of the community of editors watching that page. Who doubtless have also seen the sources on the TP. Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:28, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- You have recently claimed that the articles by The National Post, The Globe and Mail, and The Calgary Herald are "blogs". These are major Canadian newspapers, not blogs. Please undo your reversion. Ontario Teacher BFA BEd (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry
I am terribly sorry if I caused any trouble I was just joking with a friend and thought there would be no harm. It will not happen again. REDTMR1 (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Thank you...
for all your good work here, but... please try to avoid syntax errors like the one which led to this edit. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Wouldn't want to put you out of a job. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 06:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Something quick before this IP gets temporarily blocked again and I have to start using a different one...
In regards to your comments here, it is extremely refreshing to see an admin who actually has a head on their shoulders! Bbb23 and Diannaa are the only other two I can say that about (though, admittedly, it's not like I've encountered every admin Wikipedia has to offer but...). It takes a special breed to see through BS (even if sometimes the BS is mine but, you also saw through other people's) instead of sticking by "friends."Cebr1979 (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) but thanks for the promotion I'm sorry things have ended up like this. I dare say I'm not meant to encourage you but... that's really rather clever what you did there. I ask no questions / get told no lies Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 03:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I did wonder what the 'R' word was...? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 05:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
AN/I
Just making you aware of this - when you left a comment regarding Wikicology's indef block proposal, your signature did not display correctly (precisely the "Fortuna" bit; the coding for the green writing must've been broken). I'm not sure how to fix it, otherwise I would've done it for you. Link to diff: Here. Best, --Ches (talk) (contribs) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for the note, Chesnaught555- I was on my phone this morning, which explains the typos-
but I can't for the life of me resolve the sig. I even retyped it off-wiki (notepad), and it still comes out the same thereSeems OK now- I had to redo the four tildes though. Got a bit worried when I saw the new message there! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)- No problem - sorry for worrying you with the message! --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ha! I thought it was the old 'there is a discussion taking place about you at...' Cheers Chesnaught555. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Perhaps I should've thought of a better title... my apologies :-) --Ches (talk) (contribs) 18:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Pseudohistorians
David Irving has written: "Nazis quite quite clearly killed millions of Jews" "There is no doubt at all that the Nazis in their 12 year rule inflicted nameless horrors on large segments of their population, including the Jews" Does this sound like the words of a holocaust denier to you? Manifest Truth (talk) 10:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Very fucking willingly, I'm sure! Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 10:47, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Courtenay, 6th/14th Earl of Devon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topsham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Bahar Kimyongür
Hi, i've opened up a discussion in Talk:Samandağ about this matter. Thanks GroGaBa (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
European Graduate School
I find it unlikely you think that removing the accreditation information from the European Graduate School's page somehow means it's no longer accredited, but I can't imagine what! else you could have meant by your comment about the diff showing that it isn't accredited. Could you please clarify? I've cited the accreditation in the discussion. Hobit (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Correction of English
Hi I don't want to remove my comments from the talk pages. But can you please correct my English a bit? These are the articles I have commented on: Achaemenid empire, Parthian empire, Sasanian Empire. Arman ad60 (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Merger discussion for List of motor yachts by length
An article that you have been involved in editing—List of motor yachts by length —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 78.148.69.211 (talk) 16:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you
Your comments at AIV are appreciated. I knew we'd crossed paths recently, at Alice Lai Nga Yu. To my minor chagrin, my usual IP was jogged to this one, at least for the moment. Cheers, 2601:188:0:ABE6:60FC:44F0:F227:C4AF (talk) 14:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
- No worries. I began by editing as an IP, and frankly eventually registered an account because it was too much hard work- automatically being considered a noob, and frankly a second class editor. Your resilence is admirable! And yes, I see you are (were) CD63- it must be annoying to do a tonne of edits and then get the counter reset to zero. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Profile of Abhishek Verma (businessman)
Can you please add a photo of Abhishek Verma to his wikipedia profile that you have been updating / editing? The photo from Abhishek Verma's Google+ profile is below. It does not have copyright issues as it is on the net.
AV photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 11:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- I'm afraid everything that's 'on the net' is usually owned by someone- people just don't realise it. See WP:F. Cheers! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Shame
As someone who's been around a while, you should know better than to do this: [8].
My vote counts just as much as anyone else's.142.105.159.60 (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed I should, and of course it does: and I do apologise. I obviously hadn't woken up! Thanks for letting me know; and yes- I know- WP:HUMAN! All the best, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- 142, Fortuna did not remove your comment at ANI. It was still there - the formatting was just off. I have taken the liberty of reformatting it and removing your now-redundant second "vote". I hope this clears things up. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:14, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- I 'just' refactored it then? Thanks to Edgar181 for pointing that out and 142.105.159.60 for raising it. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 16:36, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, I removed passages of unacceptable content from the article again, but didn't stop to check whether that removed copyright violations, your rationale for a speedy deletion nomination. My apologies if I mucked things up. Just so tired of the crap they keep off-loading there. Thank you for your good work, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:07, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- No problems CD63, thanks for doing that, I totally agree with your assesment. The copyvios were every sentence that I found, just scattered throughout. But it was still the right thing to do- cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Disruptive behaviour?
if you are referring to my 'neighbourhood' rant, it is only correct to repair the damage done to the english language by us barbaric americans; if you are referring to the 'oak park' discussion, i was confused by an edit made to my page and reached out to the editor who made it, i tried to be as courteous as possible and if i seemed impolite it was definitely not purposeful; and if you are referring to the vandal counter, I HAVE URGES! and i undid it afterward (and before you messaged me) because guilt. No matter what, i have not been in any way malicious, i was not trying to offend or "harass" anyone, and am slightly puzzled (and bothered) that you contacted me because of it. if this post seems in any way "disruptive" to you, i assure it is not meant to be either, so chill mang, chill. JonCruz14 (talk) 22:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC) JonCruz14
User TheBellaTwins1445
There, I'm not trying to vandalize Wikipedia, I don't even know why are you putting this tome ? since the one who persists adding irrelevant images, information etc... is the user HunteWinchester123, I'm not seriously trying to vandalize anything all I believe I'm dong its my work of being an editor on Wikipedia, and why did you just warn to me when you should also of do it with that user. I would seriously want an apologize If I do something, but I don't seriously think I should of being just the one who is getting punished.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 7:35, April 13, 2016 (UTC)
If you don't believe me here I left you some of his edits.
Additionally, can you please provide context on why I'm just getting this message too, since Im not the only one. Thanks.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 7:35, April 13, 2016 (UTC)
Just take a look of her/his edition from April 13, 2016, In this one he or she don't even explain their/her changes, she has delete relievable information, add sources that I already mention are unreliable, birth name wasn't necessary as it was already mention on the page to her/him and persistently wants to add unnecessary images on the article, here is the edit so you see I'm not lying. And this is why on the main reasons I'm trying to make a call to you to stop this.TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 8:52, April 13, 2016 (UTC)
A somewhat WP:TEDIOUS discussion, since you have already been warned by the ADMINISTRATION about your edit-warring. Goodbye. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for suggesting the merge, can you please comment on it as well? WannaBeEditor (talk) 08:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
You're right, my edit was crap. I wanted to get rid of the red links while keeping your previous edits with minimum effort on my part.
That was an honest mistake, an oversight, sloppy. It was NOT on purpose, malicious, vicious or vandalism (you didn't claim that, I know).
Before you accuse others of lying or fake edits, you might wanna check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
Hope that helps, 84.167.64.228 (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
- No, sorry. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Andra Fuller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Black Jesus and 2016 Academy Awards
- Ned Maguire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Jail break and Patrick Donnelly
- Abhishek Verma (businessman) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Congress Party
- Bahar Kimyongür (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Belga
- Mark Ormrod (historian) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Membership
- Patrick Donnelly (IRA) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jail break
- Port of Ventspils (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lavia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Done cheers Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanking me into a bucket...!
Drmies that was really rather clever... How d'you do it?!?! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:17, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- It was, wasn't it? And I misspelled "vomiting"? Oh, wait--see User_talk:Drmies#User:Erolatccsgroup. :) Drmies (talk) 18:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Should've noticed the spelling. You do have some imaginitive fans, if tending towards the foetid! Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Opposites attract, no doubt. Drmies (talk) 18:27, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
- Should've noticed the spelling. You do have some imaginitive fans, if tending towards the foetid! Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Comment for you there from another user. North America1000 00:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 11:16, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
- Understood Widr, will do, and many thanks. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (John Watts (historian)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating John Watts (historian), Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've added a link on the John Watts disambiguation page and categories. This article could do with some citations from independent sources, not just self-authored and his institution, assessing his importance, though.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Your WP:AN3 report
Hi, It looks like I just beat you in lodging a report about that edit warring. It might simplify things if you removed your report - please feel free to merge your superior diff summaries into mine if you choose to do so. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- It's more the fact that the reported editor has already replied. Stand by. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes - it might work best if I merged my report into yours now Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I've just deleted my report - thanks for also doing this! Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- No worries- Ironically I just got an edit conflict trying to merge with yours! Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- At least you didn't revert me :) Nick-D (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Then we could have reported each other... what fun it could be! All the best! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Then we could have reported each other... what fun it could be!
- At least you didn't revert me :) Nick-D (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- No worries- Ironically I just got an edit conflict trying to merge with yours! Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:47, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- I've just deleted my report - thanks for also doing this! Nick-D (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes - it might work best if I merged my report into yours now Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Do you want to tell me why you've just reverted the edits I made to this page? I'm in the middle of re-writing it. Sheesh! Xyl 54 (talk) 21:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- That should be obvious. In the meantime, I've done a little to ensure it doesn't happen again. Good luck with it: it should be GA at least. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:48, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Yeah, sure, but"? No, it wasn't obvious... And "it should be GA at least"; is that sarcasm? Xyl 54 (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- No; it means it should be GA at least. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- "Yeah, sure, but"? No, it wasn't obvious... And "it should be GA at least"; is that sarcasm? Xyl 54 (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Nouman
No problem, it's easily done, and it makes sense not to press the fully-automated Twinkle button for an already-open case. Happy sockhunting. --McGeddon (talk) 10:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Anca Verma profile on WIKIPEDIA
Hi there,
We have created a Wiki profile of ANCA VERMA (wife of Indian billionaire Abhishek Verma (businessman)). She is a public personality as you would see on her page. We need your help in formatting, editing, grammar and other aspects such as adding sections etc.
Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorincharge (talk • contribs) 13:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes... I left you an edit-summary, too. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Anca Verma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Romanian
- Surrey Chapel, Norwich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Church
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:50, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Editing the toseland wikipedia article
Good afternoon I am currently editing the Toseland article as part of a university wikipedia assignment and I have noticed that most of my edits have been removed. I just want to know what are your further plans with this article and what problems I need to address in order to avoid future situation like this from taking place ever again. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billo-Conteh.M (talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Ongoing discussion at Talk:Coverage of Google Street View
Please continue the discussion here, I have asked you a question and still have not answered me.
Talk:Coverage of Google Street View
Pablothepenguin (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
New Buckenham
The second removal was of material that was NOT tagged as unreferenced; your copy / pasting of your previous edit-summary was lazy and did not apply to the edit in question. I would also like you to draw my attention to the policy which supports your statement. Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:20, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll see how you get on with developing this page by yourself for the time being. Bmcln1 (talk) 15:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Laura Branigan little brother Billy was born 1957 in Mount Kisco
I changed my mind. I am curious how you will solve the problem with both Lauras and Billy Branigan's birth year, 1957. Remember they were siblings, and siblings usually don't have the same birth year. As Devilmanozzy wrote to me "1957 stays"! And US Public Records says about Billy..28 Feb 1957. So it must stay, or what do you think? Or will you find a new birth year to Billy, when you decided Laura was born 1957 and not he? If you do, you must convince Laura's siblings Susan, Mark and Billy and of course public records that they are wrong. It might be difficult for you, though my contacts with Laura's former neighbours, classmates, sources, clips, photos from the 50's and 60's were not reliable. But I am sure you will find sources that will surprise us all that Billy Branigan was born 28 Feb 19xx! Btw..I have found more about Billy. His voting record with his voting number and also February 28, 1957. Are they also fabricated by me? If yes, how did I do it? I have no clue myself. Good luck and we are many who loves this "edit war" you have created so good on your own. And at last...Laura Branigan was born July 3, 1952 in Mount Kisco. Doesn't matter how hard you work for it. Once again, good luck in your delicate problems!--Born53 swe (talk) 08:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (The Drewe family of Broadhembury) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Drewe family of Broadhembury, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi!
Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Great work
To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Please do
I fart in your general direction. Ah! That feels a thousand times better than being called obsessive and dealing with admins who just slap on templates without much thought.
Please, enjoy your admins notice board, a hell hole of my own making that I have often regretted starting over the last decade. - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 18:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since you're quite patently not and a noob nor were acting like one, I don't really see the point in directing me to a page that tells me what I already know. But Monty Python is always appreciated on this TP.
- PS: You're fooling yourself if you think this is a democracy.
- Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, a democracy has more commonsense, less agendas and less politicians than this place. Which says less about democracy than it does Wikipedia. - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Surely this is an anarchist collective...? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- With a centralised governance model and a group of people who enforce it? And core policies that form a site constitution that need majority consensus to alter (i.e. will never happen) and law like policies that can be altered when a large majority of editors feel they need to be altered? That rather seems like another form of collective governance... or am I delusional? - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's a pretty sound analysis: couldn't argue against it. Keep in touch. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- You see now I'm confused. Are you saying my analysis is correct that I am delusional, or that Wikipedia is indeed some sort of retarded democracy? Now I grant you these two things may not be mutually exclusive, but I have an inquiring mind and dislike uncertainty so clarification is rather urgently requested! - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 21:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's a pretty sound analysis: couldn't argue against it. Keep in touch. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:11, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- With a centralised governance model and a group of people who enforce it? And core policies that form a site constitution that need majority consensus to alter (i.e. will never happen) and law like policies that can be altered when a large majority of editors feel they need to be altered? That rather seems like another form of collective governance... or am I delusional? - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Surely this is an anarchist collective...? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, a democracy has more commonsense, less agendas and less politicians than this place. Which says less about democracy than it does Wikipedia. - 203.217.39.91 (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonville–Courtenay feud, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abingdon, King's peace and Upcott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
WrestleMania 32.
Try using the talk page to explain your edits, when requested. It seems like the polite way, when there is a content dispute. Your summary didn't really resolve anything. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, that wasn't quite as polite as it could have been. What I should have said was "could you explain to me why that content was restored, because I currently consider it to be detrimental to the overall quality of the article?" Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:02, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
tut tut
Exemplia gratia. Now who gets spanked for not knowing their Latin is it you or me (hope it's me) (laughing) Si Trew (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Actually Impetratrix I am never sure is right. Well as a bloke it is all right. But with dominatrix I am never sure should it be dominatrice or domintrix it reallx depends on which language you choose. In French yours would go imperiatrice that would be say Marie Antoinette she probably wasn't but you see my point but the -ix -ice usually distinguishes the male from female in Latin but not in English so that is where I get the toin coss in English. Like we have dominatrix I am not sure have not checked Dominatrice. There is a limit to what we do on English Wikipedia so I always find those ones a bit tough. I could do stacks of London Bus Routes because there is no doubt what a London Bus looks like but the language ones are how may I put it, they are tricky if you don't know the language. As soon as you know the language your eyes switch left and right wondering should it be or not? I have stacks of dictionaries and whatever that is not the point would people use that phrase. I dunno sometimes because my bedside TV is covered with porridge when someone says on BBC "they are planning ahead" as if you could plan somehow retrospectively and it all goes over the TV but then my bible is Modern English Usage which is a bit old fashioned. Si Trew (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- I seem to remember you bollocking me for my pig Latin somewhere before ;) "You! -Yes YOU! STAND STILL LADDIE!!!" Does that mean that you spent your time dealing with Neelrice redirects...?! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Disruptive editing by user:Tnguyen4321
I think you should do something with that user. He continues his disruptive editing even when the issue has been posted on the AN/I. Thanks.
p/s: I've tagged his OR instead of reverting his editing so you can see it more clearly. Dino nam (talk) 01:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Amazing trick: I don't even notice the introduction of the OR tag in the content of the article. It is how he goes around without being blocked even he is triggering a edit warring. Here is what our wolf in sheep's clothing intends to achieve with his OR tagging subterfuge. The tag will be dated. Other editors are constraint by a deadline. Two eventualities could happen: one, nobody care to comment on the issue; or two, editors can argue with him until they are blue in the face, he would say he is not convinced, and still maintains it is an OR and declares it should me removed according to Wikipedia policy. And he would remove it on his own authority, not on consensus. He then would just blank it or replace with his own version pertaining to this specific material.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Do you care reverting Dino nam's last editing to previous version [17]? Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- You've just done it haven't you? And what exactly is wrong with "Col. Nguyen Huu An later admitted that insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp"? -which was sourced? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:42, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, you got things wrong. I just deleted "Col. Nguyen Huu An later admitted that insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp" which had been stated previous in section The air assault of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray (14-16 November): The air assault insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp.[1] And at the same time fix the orphaned referencing not defined as alerted by AnomieBOT. I did not revert Dino nam's OR-tagging.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I see, sorry. I don't know enough about it to say if it's OR or not; but why is the article so long? It's immensely (and probably unnecessarilly) detailed, with long paragraphs hanging off a single source. I reckon it should be about 25% of its current size. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's so long because it is a very important battle (the first big one for each side) in the eyes of both the American and the Viet Cong (North Vietnamese Communist) and controversial too. Yes, the OR notion is very difficult to grasp, until you have to wrestle with it.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Agree with your point. That whole section which I used to blank contains info that had been previously stated in other sections. In fact, it doesn't even talk about the things in its headline: there are about only one out of four or five sentences that talks about the air strike itself. Dino nam (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- It's so long because it is a very important battle (the first big one for each side) in the eyes of both the American and the Viet Cong (North Vietnamese Communist) and controversial too. Yes, the OR notion is very difficult to grasp, until you have to wrestle with it.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I see, sorry. I don't know enough about it to say if it's OR or not; but why is the article so long? It's immensely (and probably unnecessarilly) detailed, with long paragraphs hanging off a single source. I reckon it should be about 25% of its current size. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 15:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Since there is editing done in between versions, you cannot just "undo" but have to do it manually. Would you allow me to do it instead?Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Reminder: do you care to remove the 3 bogus OR tags[18] that Dino nam had pinned after been warned not to start an editing war? Thank you.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, go ahead, if you think they're undeserved. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I think you should better visit the talk page first. And of course, he will think that it's undeserved, because he's the one who've created the OR. Dino nam (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I did. He resumes editing war [19], ignoring your [20].Tnguyen4321 (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Please explain what does it means when the noticeboard is archived with no result and what is the next step. Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 05:40, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, go ahead, if you think they're undeserved. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Reminder: do you care to remove the 3 bogus OR tags[18] that Dino nam had pinned after been warned not to start an editing war? Thank you.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 13:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- No, you got things wrong. I just deleted "Col. Nguyen Huu An later admitted that insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp" which had been stated previous in section The air assault of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray (14-16 November): The air assault insertion of the 1/7 Air Cavalry Battalion at LZ X-Ray in the morning of November 14 had the effect of making the B3 Field Front to postpone the attack of the Pleime Camp.[1] And at the same time fix the orphaned referencing not defined as alerted by AnomieBOT. I did not revert Dino nam's OR-tagging.Tnguyen4321 (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ Nguyễn Hữu An, page 32
Re: LeonRaper
Nothing wrong with being sympathetic. BMK (talk) 04:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Don't ever expect to become an administrator by acting like a bully...
... and projecting that behavior and motivation upon others. You need to grow up. 71.184.228.118 (talk) 06:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well. That didn't seem too profitable did it, after all? Let me know when you're back. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Provide reasoning
[21] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.239.32 (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Edit summarry provided. Ciao. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Rm trolling: IP has been called to account at AN/I. I understand meaning of Rm trolling, what does the rest mean for deletion:"IP has been called to account at AN/I".
- This will explain it better than I ever could :) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Do you think it was forum shopping. Similar activities were done by the other editor. See:[22] and [23] then it wasn't called or flagged as forum shopping or where do you think policy-wise the trouble lies.59.89.239.32 (talk) 19:07, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- This will explain it better than I ever could :) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Rm trolling: IP has been called to account at AN/I. I understand meaning of Rm trolling, what does the rest mean for deletion:"IP has been called to account at AN/I".
- @Favonian: warned you against shopping; I advise you that this converation may possibly constitute similar. Just an FYI. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- {@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: asking reasoning for your deletion isn't considered as forum shopping. But since you are disinterested in replying. I will stop here.Ciao. 59.89.239.32 (talk) 19:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: kindly ask this User:TJH2018 to stop with disruptions on your page. Its O.K if you want the editor to fight for you, otherwise this is trolling when two editors are talking and an another one joining in to fight.
- You have been reported for vandalism Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well that is nice and the reasoning for this might be removing disruptive trolls when we were talking, if so dont give the answer for your other action its implied59.89.239.32 (talk) 19:33, 18 May 2016 (UTC).
- You have been reported for vandalism Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 19:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Stay off Talk
Please don't post to my user Talk anymore Fortuna, unless official WP business. IHTS (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- And if I get namechecked, that will make it official WP business. So you better make sure that don't happen. Hope you understand; I doubt it. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 09:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Let's make this clear: I don't have to do anything for you. A ping doesn't make WP official business. Courtesy notices re AN, ANI, etc. are WP official business. Other than that, stay off my Talk page. IHTS (talk) 02:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I hardly think so ;) Nice block log by the way :D haven't you got a big one :D Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 07:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Let's make this clear: I don't have to do anything for you. A ping doesn't make WP official business. Courtesy notices re AN, ANI, etc. are WP official business. Other than that, stay off my Talk page. IHTS (talk) 02:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Jackob Bernoulli
Hello Fortuna. The page you moved to Jackob Bernoulli has been moved back to Jacob Bernoulli. If you still consider that Jackob is better, please raise a proposal on the article's talk page and obtain consensus before further action. Apuldram (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Apuldram: Actually it should be Jakob Bernoulli, as per WP:COMMON; policy reflects the already-established WP:CONSENSUS of the community, so of course needs no subsequent ratification. Cheers. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thank you
Deliberately I am not looking into the WP:ANI#SimonTrew because that is for others to decide. If I get banned, all I can say in my defence is you have lost a good editor who speaks a lot of languages, translates, tidies, and so on. Yes, lately, I have been tidying up a lot of Neelix redirects and have been getting a lot of flak from various users who are not aware of the WP:G6 neelix concession. That is fine, I am a big man, but yes it does hurt when someone personally attacks you. I have no problem with someone disagreeing with me. This is no attempt to WP:CANVASS but for someone occasionally to send a wink to see what I am trying to do, which is to make Wikipedia better, it means a helluva lot to me.
I still not sure it shouldn't be imperatrice but I'll have to get my Shortbread Eating Primer to check that. Oh Shorter Latin Primer, if you rub out the oh well you get it. Si Trew (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- @SimonTrew: You're doing the dirty possibly dull work behind the scenes mate, which most people wouldn't do, and I think it's a hypocrisy for you to be some sort of Aunt Sally for others' personal opinions. Bon appetite with that Latin Shortbread! (Think Hadrian might have brought some back?!). Luck, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:13, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think I am being put up as something of an Aunt Sally I hadn't thought of that analogy. I have done about a hundred Neelix ones today. Neelix created them in good faith and I will say that until people get it into their thick heads. Just many now, with the better search engine, are not necessary are harmful. They are not harmful because Neelix created them, that is kinda coincidental, they are harmful because they block people trying to find information. When I started in 2009 I think the search engine was frankly awful and so all these kinds of redirects were absolutely necessary. I am no WP:DELETIONIST but I think if we want to make it better get readers to where they are likely to want to go sometimes getting rid of redirects is the right way to do it. Not always. Sometimes we can create them to get them where we want to go. Not so much an Aunt Sally as a Stooge really, i think the anger against Neelix has suddenly somehow been transferred onto me. I'm a big man I can take it. But yes, it does hurt sometimes. In real life if someone tried that I would look them in the eyes and they would back off. Never had to resort to physical violence in my life, you look em in the eyes ask them what they said they back off. Never hit a man (or woman for that matter) in my life. In real life I am very good at calming aggression but on Wikipedia it is not so easy to do because I can't look em in the eyes. Si Trew (talk) 20:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- You know how well I forget which president Woodrow Wilson I am bound to get the wrong one said "Speak softly and carry a big stick". That's the way to do it. I wear size eleven steel toecap boots nicely polished every day. And speak very softly. I don't need to threaten anyone. I have innate resepect where I live because of what I do for the community around me. I kinda think the word "respect" has been forgotten from Wikipedia. That is the one word I would define my life by, "respect". Respect others, respect yourself, respect your neighbours, respect your firends,respect your family, don't care if you're black white jewish muslim hindustani or even Dutch but "respect" seems to have disappeared. We should make that more prominent. Si Trew (talk) 20:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Spot on. Respect is more important than civilty; you can be civil without respecting someone, and it's obvious if you don't. i mean we know how easy it is to avoid NPA just by being polite. Which stinks, breaking the spirit if not the letter of the law. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 20:37, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Thank you once again. To spend half an hour or so ranting off with you has made it all worthwhile. Thank you for letting me spiel I needed that. Sorry to spoil your talk page, you can delete it. Right so let's take the next batch of redirects. What may they be? Wait and see. If they're not CSD they will be RfD. Si Trew (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Feel free to use this page as a shooting gallery User:SimonTrew; it's more friendly than most. Keep in touch :) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- That is so kind of you. You are cheaper than a trick cyclist and twice as good. Si Trew (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Feel free to use this page as a shooting gallery User:SimonTrew; it's more friendly than most. Keep in touch :) Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- This may amuse you this is just anecdotal. At some football match in the UK thirty years ago from the terraces they were all shouting "Bring on Wilson" and then someone shouted Woodrow Wilson and someone else Harold Wilson and Jocky Wilson and so on. So they all started calling for whatever Wilson they could think of. No idea who the substitute Wilson was, he was never brought on. Good if true. 21:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brilliant :) was it Notts Forest? must've been bad if they were calling for Harold Wilson! I remember Basil Fawlty has a bit of a thing about him, great stuff :) "Bloody Wilson!!!'"
- I love that series. I think the best one is Communication Problems with I know the actress but can't think of her name not Joan Sims she acted that superbly. As Clive James notes in his Observer TV reviews it is just kinda exactly wrong. "He did not just go out to look at the window, he went out the door, back again, into the room, out of the room, then back up the ladder and then fell off". Clive James loved those. You could never remake em now they have kinda achieved such classic status you could never remake them. Joan Sanderson.
- Yes, yes madam here is the view. "I expect to sea the sea. When I come to a seaside hotel I expect to see the sea". Yes yes Madam you can see it it is over there between the land and the sky.
- I love that series. I think the best one is Communication Problems with I know the actress but can't think of her name not Joan Sims she acted that superbly. As Clive James notes in his Observer TV reviews it is just kinda exactly wrong. "He did not just go out to look at the window, he went out the door, back again, into the room, out of the room, then back up the ladder and then fell off". Clive James loved those. You could never remake em now they have kinda achieved such classic status you could never remake them. Joan Sanderson.
- Brilliant :) was it Notts Forest? must've been bad if they were calling for Harold Wilson! I remember Basil Fawlty has a bit of a thing about him, great stuff :) "Bloody Wilson!!!'"
- This may amuse you this is just anecdotal. At some football match in the UK thirty years ago from the terraces they were all shouting "Bring on Wilson" and then someone shouted Woodrow Wilson and someone else Harold Wilson and Jocky Wilson and so on. So they all started calling for whatever Wilson they could think of. No idea who the substitute Wilson was, he was never brought on. Good if true. 21:12, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- What James drily observed was that poor old Fawlty just had the wrong temperament to run a hotel. I don't think this is from Fawlty I think this is just one of mine but I can be the same "this job would be all right if it wasn't for the customers". Si Trew (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yp, she was great. Joan Sanderson "You scabby old bat I'll put a bat up your night dress", also in East of Ipswich I think, playing an old bag of a B&B hostess. Clive James a small genius too, tragic circumstances, wtf him and his wife?! You ever been at work and some bugger says 'the customer is always right'- and you think no, the customer is bloody well wrong! Anyway Trew, got to do important stuff now... watch The Man With the Golden Gun anyway. Take acre! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Brian Clough
- Was tough enough
- To turn Notts F
- into a byword
- The F in Notts F
- Stands for Forest
- But only in Nottingham.
- Do you like my clerihew
- Clough was tuff
- In the ruff
- Off the cuff
- And in the buff
- Not sure that qualifies! (ironically, like Forest) :p Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
My talk page.
Just a polite request, that you do not post anything on my talk page (including templates), unless required to by Wikipedia policy. Thanks and have an awesome day! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Templates do not qualify. Also to inform you, your post stinks of hypocrisy. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 07:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- If you are required to place a template on my talk page, then go ahead. If it is not required by Wikipedia policy then don't.
- I don't really care what you think my post stinks of, I just see nothing to be gained from interaction with you, and would prefer to not have you posting on my talk page. Thanks, Buddy! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Nonsense. Unfortunately this isn't a legislative assembly, and you, new though you are, do not get to pass your own bylaws. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 07:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I'm trying hard but failing to understand why exactly you are so desperate to post on my talk page. I made a polite request, instead of making threats. If you really want to get into some fascinating online argument about the technicalities of wikilawyering, go find your fun elsewhere, this has already become very tedious. Thanks, Bro! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- On the contrary, I'm merely fascinated by the breath-taking hypocrisy of banning someone from your TP, and not being able to keep your fingers off this one. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I'm trying hard but failing to understand why exactly you are so desperate to post on my talk page. I made a polite request, instead of making threats. If you really want to get into some fascinating online argument about the technicalities of wikilawyering, go find your fun elsewhere, this has already become very tedious. Thanks, Bro! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I would imagine that from your responses to me, and the lack of a "please don't post on my talk page" request, that you had no issue with me posting here. Don't worry, I won't waste my time on your talk page again. (unless required to by wikipedia rules) - Thanks mate! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes stick around, you'll find that some editors need not descend to that level of childishness. Mate indeed. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see you have several editors asking you to not post on their talk pages except when required by Wikipedia practices like noticeboard notices. Please abide by their requests, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, and consider whether your talk page comments might come across as antagonistic. Liz Read! Talk! 09:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Antagonism is reciprocal User: Liz, and you might want to look at why some editors respond that way; in the most recent examples, after I was trolled on another TP, and most recently after advising an editor that he was edit warring. I'm sure you take those issues even more seriously than comments on my talk. In the meantime, be assured I will give those requests the deference they deserve. Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 10:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I see you have several editors asking you to not post on their talk pages except when required by Wikipedia practices like noticeboard notices. Please abide by their requests, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi, and consider whether your talk page comments might come across as antagonistic. Liz Read! Talk! 09:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Yes stick around, you'll find that some editors need not descend to that level of childishness. Mate indeed. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 08:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I would imagine that from your responses to me, and the lack of a "please don't post on my talk page" request, that you had no issue with me posting here. Don't worry, I won't waste my time on your talk page again. (unless required to by wikipedia rules) - Thanks mate! Spacecowboy420 (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I ought to clarify the above statement in more detail, for watchers, passing editors, etc.
- When Liz says "you have several editors", she actually means (in recent months, anyway) two, as 'several,' Wikionary tells us, from the seventeeth-century, has meant 'a number more than two'.
- When IHTS banned me from his TP, it was because I commented in response to this comment by an IP. This is not just any IP; this is an WP:LTA, user Vote (X) for Change, who had previously that day been mass-reverted by myself and others on Wales' TP here, and earlier under another IP, had posted on BethNaught's page and was reverted; and finally posts on IHardlyThinkSo's page. Which was not reverted; and, indeed, is still there.
- The second is far simpler. Spacecowboy420 does not like being informed that he is (almost) edit-warring and approaching 3RR: his immediate response is to delete the template and impose a 'ban.' It is possible that he believes that WP:CIVIL trumps WP:AGF; it does not; they are mutually inclusive.
- Lastly, my personal opinion is administrators should probably not tell editors to desist from things before they have done them: this suggests, rightly or wrongly, a lack of faith.
- This is background, not a rallying cry or a debating point. Cheers,
- Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Valery Surkoff
Yeah, I get irritated too. But they're indeffed and I don't see them ever being unblocked. Please don't twit them. Bishonen | talk 20:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC).
- It wasn't so much irritation- just a suggestion as to what the underlying problem was. Gotcha though. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 21:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
"Trolling"
Hi, why'd you revert my edit to User talk:SimonTrew? It wasn't "Trolling" and you obviously didn't assume good faith. This user has been stalking Neelix's edits; I think that is a valid reason to give them a warning for harassment. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- I have not been "stalking" Neelix redirects. (How is that possible to stalk a list that is WP:G6 Neelix concession and a list is not a person? ""Walking" the list certainly but not stalking it. What does that mean?) I have been patiently and diligently going through the User:Anomie#Neelix list and keeping, listing at CSD, or listing at RfD as I see fit. I didn't even see what you posted User:Anarchyte but feel free to post it again. It's An administrative list created in a one off run by a bot. How can I possibly stalk that? Can it sue me?
- See the ANI for User:SimonTrew. I really get fed up explaining my actions over and over again. Take it there. If you look at my edit history even this morning (UTC+2) you will see I have actually kept and rcatted far more Neelix redirects than I have listed at RfD and CSD.
- I really do not understand this at all. The redirect silvery-leaved which was recently created (21 May) taken as WP:R3 by User:Iridescent nothing to do with the WP:G6 Neelix concession, was not actually created by Neelix, (or Neelix is back in which case he's more than welcome to edit anyway but not to create redirects, that is the entire extent of his "ban", he has essentially banished himself Wikipedia hasn't and he made thousands of thousands of good redirects when the search engine was not as good as it is now), as a non-admin I can't see the history of who created it but I imagine it was in good faith as indeed Neelix created redirects in good faith.
- I didn't list it at CSD, we had a couple of similar ones for silver trees which I was not entirely sure about and took them to RfD so that our botanic experts could check them out for sanity and they said they were fine and they are speedily withdrawn by me as keep earlier this morning and really essentially waiting for another editor to close them since as an involved party I can't really close them myself
{{nac}}or not, that would be unfair. What's this "stalking" nonsense? I think you must be mistaken.
I'm going to copy/paste this to my talk page.
No if Fortuna doesn't mind us squatting at this user's talk page for a bit, I might as well just @Anarchyte: and leave the conversation in one place.
Si Trew (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- No worries both! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Ogle, 1st Baron Ogle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forfeited and Neville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
ANI
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hey, this might be interesting to you. --Jayron32 14:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Indeed! Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Jayron32: Might be missing something here, but wouldn't the common response to an editor recreating the same deleted thing four times usually- all things being equal- be a preventative (at the least) block? As disruptive behaviour, if nothing else? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's what we're discussing. --Jayron32 14:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Right. Allow me to to gee things along a bit. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's what we're discussing. --Jayron32 14:54, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Jayron32: Might be missing something here, but wouldn't the common response to an editor recreating the same deleted thing four times usually- all things being equal- be a preventative (at the least) block? As disruptive behaviour, if nothing else? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
May 2016
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Henry VI of England, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.205.197.158 (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- In my attempt to look into why I would have been invoked here at all, I discovered the strangest thing: the IP tagged themself as a "suspected sockpuppet" of me, for no immediately apparent reason as I can't identify any topic on which we ever would have interacted. So yeah, I'm putting my money on "unproductive editor, trolling". Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers, Bearcat, I reported it to AIV, don't know whether it was really vandalism. Nice of him to own up to your socking for you though! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 18:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers, Bearcat, I reported it to AIV, don't know whether it was really vandalism. Nice of him to own up to your socking for you though!
User:Chow chun wai/Alice Lai Nga Yu
Just in case you haven't figured it out, when a page has been deleted, a user may request a WP:REFUND. An admin who grants the refund may decide to 'userify' the article by placing the undeleted page in the user's space. Although it is now a user's subpage, it can show as being "created" by the admin who did the refund. Six months later, when it hasn't been worked on any further, you nominate it for deletion as a stale draft, but your automated script thinks that the admin who did the refund is the person who needs to be notified about the speedy notice. You may want to consider having a quick look at whom you are sending notifications to, and perhaps removing any erroneous ones. --RexxS (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Why is User:Geogre so significant to WP? Muffled Pocketed 15:33, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- You probably need to read a few of the articles listed at User:Geogre #Latest de novo articles to get some idea. Then make your own mind up. --RexxS (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem to have been obsessed by references; but fair play on the feller. Thanks for that info above by the way; didn't release that a refunded article is technically the Admin's. Due mainly to the fact that I don't think I've seen a refunded article before. Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 20:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Most writers in the early days didn't have the same obsession with citing every sentence. Geogre would simply read up on a load of sources and write the article from what he'd learned from them. At the bottom of the page he'd note which his principal sources were. He always cited any direct quotes of course. If you think about it, that's pretty much how all previous encyclopedias (and many scholarly works) were written. The articles are no less supported by reliable sources; it just takes more effort for those who want to verify them. --RexxS (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Less bureaucracy? I see what you mean on many of those articles. Is that him in the photos you have? Muffled Pocketed 22:36, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Most writers in the early days didn't have the same obsession with citing every sentence. Geogre would simply read up on a load of sources and write the article from what he'd learned from them. At the bottom of the page he'd note which his principal sources were. He always cited any direct quotes of course. If you think about it, that's pretty much how all previous encyclopedias (and many scholarly works) were written. The articles are no less supported by reliable sources; it just takes more effort for those who want to verify them. --RexxS (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem to have been obsessed by references; but fair play on the feller. Thanks for that info above by the way; didn't release that a refunded article is technically the Admin's. Due mainly to the fact that I don't think I've seen a refunded article before. Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 20:56, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- You probably need to read a few of the articles listed at User:Geogre #Latest de novo articles to get some idea. Then make your own mind up. --RexxS (talk) 20:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
I hate to say that I was wrong, but...
judging from your recent edits/comments, I was most certainly wrong to judge you and to state that your comments were not welcome on my talk page.
It seems very obvious to me, that your comments/edits are fair and designed to improve wikipedia.
I apologize for being a defensive and judgmental ass. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 06:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Spacecowboy420: No worries, and thank you for that. We just got off on the wrong foot; it happens. You do good work here- removing swathes of unsourced crap is an interest of mine too (and if it's POV bigotry, all the better!) Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 13:49, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Imelda Marcos
We just reached a consensus at the talk page.Imeldific (talk) 11:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Made me smile
I hope I'm not the only one to catch the humor in this edit--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well caught Sphilbrick; didn't think anyone would notice... Muffled Pocketed 15:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Question
Filing an SPI in a case like you describe is often closed out of hand. The best way to address it is to privately contact a member of the SPI team, probably better a CheckUser, who can decide whether to investigate outside of the SPI process.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Check. Err... like you Bbb23? Muffled Pocketed 17:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you like. Please bear in mind that I don't generally reply to e-mail, so if I have something to say, I'll post it here.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- BTW, for notifications (pings, etc.) to work, the ping or other template must be included in the same edit that you sign. You signed in your first edit but didn't put in the template until the third of the series. I came back here just to check, not because I received your ping.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you like. Please bear in mind that I don't generally reply to e-mail, so if I have something to say, I'll post it here.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Another 3RR report about Battle of Ia Drang
Hello Fortuna. see this AN3 report in case you have any comment to make. You filed a report about the same page earlier but it expired with no action. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks EdJohnston, just did (ironically just before you posted). I think that what I filed could be considered a lucky escape for both of them- temporarily. But the thing has been a tit-for-tat for months over multiple articles; if no-one else has got involved in them, perhaps it's because their behaviour has locked editors out? Could be possible. Muffled Pocketed 20:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Imelda Marcos
| Imeldific bocked 24-hours by EdJohnston; also note the former's retaliatory AN3 here. Muffled Pocketed 10:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Please discuss at the talk page]. Those edits are with WP:SAMESURNAME. Imeldific (talk) 22:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Gilbert (tenor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Orfeo and The Impossible Dream (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bonville–Courtenay feud
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bonville–Courtenay feud you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Hello, I'm Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to poo has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Muffled Pocketed 13:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Wrong. Count them.
Nope, wrong. I only made 3 (the multiples only count as one because they were partial). Too Small a Fish to Fry (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- Excellent. Thanks for the confession, Too Small a Fish to Fry. Muffled Pocketed 13:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Our interactions
Hi Fortuna. I'm posting here regarding what is going on over at the Edit-warring page and the statement that you and I have collaborated on fish pages. I have looked at our interactions using the interaction checker - nothing there about fish. I have looked at your contributions over the last couple of months - nothing there about fish. Is the editor correct to say that we have collaborated? Feel free if you want to delete this message and answer at my Talk page. I forgot to mention - I hope the smelly feet problem gets better soon ;-) DrChrissy (talk) 15:36, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- @DrChrissy: No, I think you are precisely right: I had double-checked that myself earlier, and, as you say, no sign (or smell!) of fish. I think it should probably be taken for what it was; a baseless accusation intended to demean other editors and impugne their motives. This, perhaps, should not be unexpected, considering that editor's history- it seems like a default response. This was a very good point! Muffled Pocketed 15:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the speedy reply. To be honest, I work so much on here and with so many other editors I was dreading a reply from you such as - "don't you remember that time we created the article on flying fish" or the like. OK, I'll bring this up at the noticeboard. It is not a major issue at all, but I think people should know it is a completely baseless statement which misleads the community. DrChrissy (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
A7
Hi - A7 does not apply to an entire species, only specific animals, such as someone's pet dog "Fido" - "This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s)
". I've improved one of your recent tags and reverted you on one other. Thanks -- samtar talk or stalk 12:43, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, I do agree most of these pages need deleting -- samtar talk or stalk 12:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I have been a little heavy handed about it: I didn't notice the distinction between species and individuals. It was only the unreferenced ones I nominated- there's a few more with a ref or two that I left. Muffled Pocketed 12:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not a problem! I think the deciding admin will still choose to delete the majority of them -- samtar talk or stalk 12:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- What would you have suggested as an accurate reason for CSD (if any)? I did wonder about 'no context'; but didn't think that would apply either? 'Custom rationale'?! Thanks for your advice, Samtar.Muffled Pocketed 13:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've been thinking about that too - I would actually suggest either bringing that up in the AN/I thread and seeing if an admin would consider doing a mass deletion, or starting an AfD and listing all the non-referenced articles there. Either way, we get some community concensus about what to do, poor DinoLover's page doesn't get filled with CSD notices and the pages get dealt with! Just my 2c -- samtar talk or stalk 13:06, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've been thinking about that too - I would actually suggest either bringing that up in the AN/I thread and seeing if an admin would consider doing a mass deletion, or starting an AfD and listing all the non-referenced articles there. Either way, we get some community concensus about what to do, poor DinoLover's page doesn't get filled with CSD notices and the pages get dealt with! Just my 2c
- What would you have suggested as an accurate reason for CSD (if any)? I did wonder about 'no context'; but didn't think that would apply either? 'Custom rationale'?! Thanks for your advice, Samtar.Muffled Pocketed 13:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Not a problem! I think the deciding admin will still choose to delete the majority of them -- samtar talk or stalk 12:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'm sorry if I have been a little heavy handed about it: I didn't notice the distinction between species and individuals. It was only the unreferenced ones I nominated- there's a few more with a ref or two that I left. Muffled Pocketed 12:55, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanking
Apologies. That was done to get your attention. Won't do it again. Imeldific (talk) 16:29, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well, if it was unintentional, then there's no hard feelings. And every now and then is fine. But every two minutes?! In any case, you don't need to get my attention, I assure you :) Muffled Pocketed 16:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- It won't happen again. Imeldific (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Haydn's Orfeo
I stumbled across a sandbox of yours, changed a bit, but don't know ow to solve Haydn's Orfeo, which is the same opera mentioned a little later as if it was a different one, L'anima del filosofo? - Operatic habit: no need to link the composer when the opera has an article ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Many thanks Gerda Arendt- unfortunately the article is in userspace now. Since this is as far as my opera knowledge goes... Need some expert eye. Apparently he's even a baritone, not a tenor... Thanks though :) Muffled Pocketed 19:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- When the voice type is not certain, "(singer)" is a good dab ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- ps: Gabriele Schnaut went up from contralto to soprano and back again, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Poor Conduct
I'd not say hi your conduct is really very bad. you have no right to delete something from someone elses user page. Moreover ur user page says u are an apprentice editor and ur talk page says u are a tutunum or veteran editor. This is very bad and very confusing. pls correvt it and display the correct badge of service awards And pls leave my user and talk page alone If u wanna reply use ping. i am not interested in opening ur page again --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- You are a very new editor, and I'm afraid you do not know what bad conduct is. You should not pretend to be something you are not; even for a so-called joke, that is unacceptable in an online community. You repeatedly ignored more than one editor before eventually (partially) rectifying the issue. You pretended to be an administrator; an 'awesome-Wikipedian'; and to have your own day. None of these things are true, as you have only been here a few weeks. Those are things that are awarded by the community as a sign of trust and respect and they have to be earned. They cannot be just taken. And those barnstars: did you create those accounts as well? @VarunFEB2003:. Muffled Pocketed 09:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- I told u i was constructing my page i had copied the items ill remove them now pls my construction hasnt finished ill remove conflicting material dont edit pls--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- @VarunFEB2003: You did not answer my question about the barnstars I see. You have until this evening, your time, to remove everything on your user page that isn't true, or I will seek administrative attention. Muffled Pocketed 09:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: I have asked at the help desk of wikipedia if any user is allowed to award himself barnstars or copy the editor of the week box AND THE ANSWER WAS YES. you wont find it there now because it is in archives of Help Desk. Go and search it and see. I QUESTIONED THERE FIRST BEFORE PLACING ANYTHING ON MY PAGES So I'd better tell u that u dont interfere in my page it will be good for u. You have no right to do anything to anybody elses wikipedia user page. It is not an Encyclopaedia article that you can make changes whenever u want. So it will be a lot good if u better forget about me. MOREOVER I HAVE WRITTEN THEY ARE FALSE AND FOR HUMOR ONLY. (i HAVE REMOVED MY OWN DAY AND ADMIN THING)
- I told u i was constructing my page i had copied the items ill remove them now pls my construction hasnt finished ill remove conflicting material dont edit pls--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
--VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dear VarunFEB2003, how good to hear from you again. Yes I know what you were told here; I have already told you what other editors might think if they realised you were deliberately misleading them (for fun? This is not really the place for that, as you might be realising). I note you have not explained what the accounts are that you awarded the barnstars to yourself in the name of are- why did you set them up? That's something else that is looked at with a jaundiced eye. Your attitude certainly seems to tend towards the aggressive; you may think it amusing to do so, but it will make you few friends. In fact, many people are already watching your account; and remember, everything you type, everything you remove, is always there in the history. So it is really better not to go around threatening people like you have. May I suggest that instead of concerning yourself with the arcane (such as bots, recognition, and awards), you demonstrate your willingness to contribute to the project; if people think you are not listening to them or only here for your own aggrandizement, then your career as a Wikipedia editor, such as it is, may end sooner than you would like. Goodbye. Muffled Pocketed 15:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Bro i have nothing personally against anyone Now u see the editor of week box it NOMORE SAYS EDITOR OF WEKK IT SAYS NOT THE EDITOR OF WEEK IS IT OKAY NOW? And sorry for my aggression I was just too angry, sorry. The barnstarts do not point to anyone so u can already see they are false and I have also mentioned. Its getiing night here Ill come to reply tomorrow morning. Pls do not edit my page anymore I have removed or edited all conflict material that misleads VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Okaaaay... Nothing wrong with enthusiasm; sometimes a gentle step is needed though! Sleep well bro :) Muffled Pocketed 15:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks and I just got up. a sleep really did good : cooled my brain. I am really sorry for my last nights conduct. Is my page okay now? Anything still that is conflicting. Pls reply. Thanks and regards. Could U pls ping me as I open lot of pages and I forget them, sorry VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 06:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- @VarunFEB2003: Sorry I didn't get back to you, I didn't see the message alert. No worries! I say we're probably all a-👌 !!! Good man. Muffled Pocketed 09:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks but how u made that nice sign of the hand VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- That was on my phone I'm afraid, but if you go to WP:EMOTE there's loads there to use- and someone else who knows slut those things might even show you how to make more (if that's possible, I don't know). Muffled Pocketed 10:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thank you for your continued diligence and civility -- samtar talk or stalk 14:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
|
- Part of that sounds slightly sardonic but many thanks Samtar!!! Muffled Pocketed 14:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- It does doesn't it! Don't mean it like that but seriously, keep up the good work -- samtar talk or stalk 14:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers, Samtar- I reckon it's just, the amount of nonsense you can get in a day here makes the odd nice gesture seem a bit out of place! Muffled Pocketed 15:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- It does doesn't it! Don't mean it like that
- Part of that sounds slightly sardonic
Your GA nomination of Bonville–Courtenay feud
The article Bonville–Courtenay feud you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Bonville–Courtenay feud for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Anti-Flame Barnstar | |
| Heated Conflict Not A Problem For You --VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
- Ha! Very kind... And sometimes true Muffled Pocketed 10:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- @HighInBC:... I think you would appreciate the irony here! Muffled Pocketed 10:00, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ha! Very kind... And sometimes true
- really true for u VarunFEB2003 (talk • contribs) 10:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- I am afraid the irony is lost on me. Must be too subtle for me to get. HighInBC Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}} 17:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
| DAB done, cheers Muffled Pocketed 10:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loveday (arbitration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christine Carpenter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC) |
Oi!
Watch your edits! Hope all is going well -- samtar talk or stalk 09:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Samtar: I really do apologise! I got that thing with a temporary server crash message, so went back and reposted. I guess that resulted in your edit conflict too! Sorry about that 😢 Muffled Pocketed 09:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Quite alright -- samtar talk or stalk 09:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
- Quite alright
It's really interesting that WP's guideline on royalty means Johanna gets an article, even though she was a 2 year old baby. It's frustrating. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 10:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Paul Benjamin Austin: Yep: See: User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi#Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine Muffled Pocketed 10:47, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry i lost track of the earlier discussion. It's such a stupid guideline. She wasn't even really a princess as there was no Grand Duchy of Hesse for her to be Princess of. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 10:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Does it survive AfDs? Where is the guideline, I couldn't find it PBA? Muffled Pocketed 11:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Minnow
| Misused. Muffled Pocketed 10:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Plip! |
The user has edited since the thread has opened. He/She is ignoring it, just like (s)he's happy to ignore the explanations of what WP:CITEVAR means and what a citation style is. What if (s)he continues to ignore it? We all go on our merry way as if nothing happened? Josh Milburn (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @J Milburn: Look- The point I was really getting at was: by that time, there were three- three- admins all arguing the toss with each other. If that had been 'ordinary' editors (regardless of any sanction to come) that would have been hatted, or collapsed, or something. Surely. Who knows- maybe he has looked at the thread and seen how it's ended up. Just saying. Not suggesting he escape (clearly he should not) scott-free- but at the time I was just trying to subtly indicate what scraps look like to the wider community, that's all. I think 'unseemly' summed it up well (and allowed me to temporarilly feel like Louis Mazzini...
- Thanks for the message, though. Muffled Pocketed 16:25, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your post at User talk:73.133.140.233, though I'll mention that Bishzilla doesn't like it when I'm edit conflicted. Go back in pocket! Bishonen | talk 19:15, 15 June 2016 (UTC).
- MMMMFFFFFUUUUURGH!* The other editor's view was understandable- I think the anon had been leading him a runaround for sometime! I name-checked you on his page too. *Finds baconbits for 'zilla* Muffled Pocketed 19:23, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Did someone say bacon? -- samtar talk or stalk 19:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Samtar:
It would certainly get his career back on track- one way or another! Muffled Pocketed 19:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Samtar:
- Did someone say bacon? -- samtar talk or stalk 19:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
I am not a VANDAL
| Trolling. Currently at An/I wishing he was wearing an anti-WP:BOOMERANG hat... Muffled Pocketed 10:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
You have blocked me as an Vandalism only account, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BerendWorst (talk • contribs) 09:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC) |
Neville–Neville feud
Rather than me causing another " ******* edit conflict" - to quote your edit summary - would you mind correcting refered to referred in Neville–Neville feud - thanks - Arjayay (talk) 17:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Arkell v. Pressdram speaks for me on these matters. Yours, Muffled Pocketed 18:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- I find the OED more accurate - Arjayay (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes; you would want it spelt out wouldn't you. Muffled Pocketed 18:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- I find the OED more accurate - Arjayay (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. 20:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference desk trolling
You reverted good faith edits at the Reference desk (which can only be trolling) and had the nerve to claim you were reverting a troll. Are you incapable of doing anything constructive? 79.77.28.185 (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- I know. I love it. Easy Like Sunday Morning. Muffled Pocketed 18:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Disjointed Reply
Yup. That was the first thing that came to mind. I'm trying not to make accusations but the quacking is pretty loud. Glad I wasn't the only one brushing off feathers. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Harrington (Yorkist knight), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Affinity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Eagle Eyed
|
Sharp Eyed spoter of detial |
| New to this game so thanks for picking up on the 'nonsense' of a photograph of a 40 year old independent village book shop. Have now added ref and citations instead. Through people like you I learn! Ipingalex (talk) 14:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thank you for letting me know about the incident. Very kind of you. Im slightly puzzled about why it was created, but, hey ho! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.46.20.240 (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Dan Wagner
Your recent change to Dan Wagner article has been reverted by User:Techtrek. It has been reported that this user may have an undeclared interest in the subject, http://uk.businessinsider.com/techtreks-wikipedia-edits-on-powa-founder-dan-wagner-2016-3. Please can you assist? 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for that, 2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB. Feel free to email. That behaviour seems pretty consistent over the last few years? Muffled Pocketed 19:01, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your assistance. Unfortunately, they've reverted your changes again. You are correct, this has been going on for a number of years. It always turns into a pr puff piece. Suspect the account ia him or his or company flame pr as the account contributed the profile picture with the copyright belonging to flamepr
2A02:C7F:C207:A800:B997:C880:E1FA:C5EB (talk)
Please do not interfere
| Hspa.22 blocked as a sock. Surprise surprise. Muffled Pocketed 12:10, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Its between me and material scientist do not interfere old...pls DO NOT.....!! AND DK NOT SEND WIKI MESSAGES WHILE I AM IN COLEEGE LECTURE...!! Hspa.22 (talk) 09:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
|
Pls stop attacking me...!!
| See above ^^^ |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Please stop sending messages on my talkpage.., Hspa.22 (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
|
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| If we work together, we can improve wikipedia. Keep wondering y u keep revising my edits when all I wanna do is sort the list alphabetically and add missing names. Makes it easier for people to find names and see which ones are missing. If u wanna point any mistakes I'm making, I'm open to suggestions and ways to improve 1960boy (talk) 11:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
Will keep this here for VarunFEB2003: Aide-memoire.
== Some Advice RE: Your editing ==
I just thought I'd give you a little advice: Right now, it really feels like you do not understand what Wikipedia is about. You have just under 1,500 edits, and over 1,200 of them are to User or User Talk pages. You have a total of 63 149 edits to Talk and Mainspace pages combined, less than 10% of your edits. [25] This is an encyclopedia, not a social media site. Barnstars, awards, and gussying up your User Page are all minor distractions to the main one: The Encyclopedia.
There have been users blocked in the past due to not being here to improve the Encyclopedia. You should probably take note of the second bolded line under WP:!HERE. Between the fact that your contribution percentages are so far out of balance, the fact that you are trying to keep a non-free file without even trying to understand why you can not do that, and the fact that you keep asking everyone to sign your guestbook like we are on MySpace, I am afraid you will probably head toward a block due to disruption sooner rather than later, unless you change how you are doing things. 2602:306:C41D:E880:C957:2302:5BD5:3869 (talk) 23:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Yes, it was Saatvik.Jacob Material Scientist I was thinking of. Sorry I was a bit cryptic, I was dashing out of the house at the time! Still, all's well that ends well as a countryman of mine once wrote. I'm keeping an eye on {{noping|Hspa.20}] but I'm not sure yet that it's him. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:07, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Malcolmxl5: He mentioned Hspa.17 and Hspa.19 on his TP too- although also claimed they were administrators- and they don't seem to be registered- YET! Keeping an eye out for them to do so though. Cheers mate Muffled <for nt color="red">Pocketed 16:19, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, those don't exist. I'm hesitating about Hspa.20 because they didn't use a mobile like the others but we can wait and see. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Right; although just to let you know that here he acknowledges he is on a mobile at that time, but also that he has a laptop at home (30 miles away- not that far!)- so it could well be that being used? Muffled Pocketed 16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hspa.20 (talk · contribs · count) is
Confirmed.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers bbb. Call me Van Helsing Muffled Pocketed 17:08, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- You mean Dr. Van Helsing. I wonder if he's related to Drmies.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Sock Smeller Persuivant at your service :) The doc's rocks meeces! Muffled Pocketed 18:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers bbb. Call me Van Helsing
- Hspa.20 (talk · contribs · count) is
- Right; although just to let you know that here he acknowledges he is on a mobile at that time, but also that he has a laptop at home (30 miles away- not that far!)- so it could well be that being used? Muffled Pocketed 16:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, those don't exist. I'm hesitating about Hspa.20 because they didn't use a mobile like the others but we can wait and see. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 06:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Techtrek (talk) 06:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- It is so obvious that user King col is the same person as the IP address. In my last two edits, I have corrected exact same mistake that was made by the user King Col and one made by the IP address [26] [27]. Both of them are adding links as references to talkpage text without creating a dummy reference list. It is very clear and obvious that King col logs out to edit to avoid bringing scrutiny to his user account and when the page was finally locked, he started editing using his account. I will request an administrator to block this person for acting as multiple people which is fraud.
Can you please report him for this now that I am agreeing to only edit the talkpage, it would be completely unfair if he starts to vote stack. --Techtrek (talk) 06:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Catherine of Lancaster
I apologize for reapplying my edit without explanation--I didn't realize you'd undone my previous edit before I reapplied it (I thought I might have mixed that page up with another one). That seems to be the new format for the house section of the royalty infobox (see pages of people from more well-known houses such as the Houses of Hanover, Plantagenet, and Windsor), as the "House of" part is rather redundant. ~ Iamthecheese44 (talk) 07:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Iamthecheese44: Please show me the MoS guideline and consensus for this change. Muffled Pocketed 08:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
"rv unexplained removal of content"
Please revert yourself. I have already started a discussion on the talk page about whether that material should be included on the main page, and per WP:CONSENSUS that material should not be included until that discussion is concluded.
Consider this a warning for edit warring behavior and casting aspersions in the talk page history. The change was clearly explained. --Izno (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Sorry about the above--I'm just quite confused in this instance about why I'm the one being reverted. x_x --Izno (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:52, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Template Abuse
WTF is this about? Did you not bother to read what you were templating about before you posted a template on my talk page? Is this plain ignorance on your part, a joke, or simply trolling? Whatever it is, in the future I'll thank you to put the slightest bit of thought into whatever you bring my way before you do it. :bloodofox: (talk) 02:20, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Slapping a tag about "ANI not agreeing with me" is both incorrect and immature bullshit. If you've got something to say, then go ahead and say it rather than harassment via inappropriate templates on my talk page. :bloodofox: (talk) 08:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Help and advice needed
If u see on administrative noticeboard for edit warring on this discussion u will see that whatever edits I had made were in good faith and not vandalism. However the IP whom I had helped create that article reported me because I had made some good faith edits which he considered vandalsim. He thinks I am WP:NOTHERE. There may have been incidents in the past that may have depicted me as here not to build an encyclopedia but then I learnt and I am mending my ways. Still I am being seen through the image of a guy not here to build encyclopedia. Fortuna I plead u too alow me to show my improvement. I really want to build an encyclopaedia. Pls give me one chance of proving myself, I am no more interested in making my user page and stuff. Pls give me a fresh start. I shall not do things which WP:NOTHERE people do. Once chance is all I neeed. I am too new and too small just a 13 year old. I have told you everything and I seek help. Many thanks and sincere regards --Varun ☎ 06:54, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Loving the humour earlier! Because It made me laugh, here is a barnstar! You have a really good sense of humour. Enjoy! Class455fan1 (talk) 15:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC) |
- @Class455fan1: Many thanks, 455 Right Away, Stationmaster! Muffled Pocketed 15:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) @Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Never knew you liked trains mate! Class455fan1 (talk) 15:44, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Rm trolling.
Some falafel for you!
|
Guess you don't like cheeseburgers, huh. That's fine. Have some falafel instead! JohannSnow (talk) 22:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC) |
Edit summary
In this edit summary you didn't specify a reason. Furry-friend (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Outing
Who did I out? I am choosing to edit using an IP. Many individuals do so. 173.52.99.208 (talk) 18:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)