Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Sartorius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 03:29, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Sartorius

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable singer. Only promotional babble in references. - üser:Altenmann >t 04:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I promoted this article from AfC, based on the discussion there. Singer has appeared on Billboard Hot 100 chart, which STRONGLY suggests notability. Need for article improvement is not an appropriate deletion criteria. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per 78.26; passes WP:MUSIC. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 19:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He passes WP:MUSIC with his single on the Top 100. Improvement doesn't equal deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:32, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep International chart success is an iron standard for notability. Chubbles (talk) 22:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets Wikipedia's WP:MUSIC criteria. Lots of hits in Google news.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:20, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I created this page because of Jacob Sartorius' Notability and association with notable companies and enterprises, such as Vine, musical.ly, Billboard Hot 100, United Talent Agency. This page meets Wikipedia's standards and policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rose Sartorius (talk • contribs) 05:15, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Sartorius stop claiming false WP:OWNERSHIP of Jacob Sartorius. I added a majority of the (sourced) information and citations [1] [2] and submitted the article for review [3]. Here are some of your edits, not a single citation used. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] And the first edit was actually by "Ivyarrow"[13], so neither of us actually "created" or started the page, but one did make much more significant contributions. I LOVE YOU JACOB SARTORIUS XOXOXO (talk) 04:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This person is sufficiently notable. --Dcirovic (talk) 06:49, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, significant contributor here. I added a majority of the information and references to the article and submitted it at Articles for creation. SwisterTwister declined it and I agree with his decision. Someone better not claim I'm breaking one or more of your precious policies by exercising my right to ¡vote!
Keep as this individual is notable - in fact, his single recently entered the Billboard Hot 100. --Zero^talk 14:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Poor article? Yes. Non-notable? No. He easily passes WP:MUSIC point 2 as one of his songs has appeared in the top 100. Omni Flames (talk) 04:52, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for better or worse, sufficient coverage exists of him to meet GNG. Article has/had some COI and promo issues, and it should be kept watched, but it does meet gng itco. Crow^Caw 18:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep – Passes WP:GNG, especially for being on the Billboard Hot 100 as a passing criteria for WP:MUSICBIO. Adog104 ^{Talk to me} 22:24, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.