Talk:The Unit
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Unit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Unit. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Unit at the Reference desk. |
Television: Episode coverage B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Unit article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Premise - Delta Force?
In the show the cast make numerous references to being Rangers. Do they ever refer to themselves as being Delta Force? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.248.62 (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- No not in the show but the Show is based of a book writing about Delta Force. I hope that helps if you have any more questions just let me know.--Steam Iron 19:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, Jonas did use the name Delta once in the episode "Morale, Welfare, and Recreation", but not in direct reference to himself or his team. The exact line spoken by him was "Flag the following: Navy SEALs, Rangers, Army Ordinance Disposal, Deltas, CIA, Special Projects. Look for any and all building personnel with military backgrounds." Spartan198 (talk) 14:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Does Delta refer to themselves as such? Is there in fact any such unit? Yes, I know there is a USGOV website outlining the requirements to apply for selection to Delta. So what. I'm just saying, if you know the name, it's probably not being used anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.59 (talk) 03:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
The 1st Special Forces Operational Detachment-Delta (1st SFOD-D) is there official name. Would you be able to walk into their building? Most likely not because it's also most likely hidden much like the book and the tv show describe. The "303rd Logistical Studies Unit" is their cover name, and I doubt anyone not in the military knows the true cover names of the actual Delta Force units. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.69.70.71 (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Season 5
Does anyone know if there will be a season 5 by anyone. Its such a amazing series!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.100.140 (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
There will not be a fifth season. The Unit has been cancelled. Tomm007 (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
@Tomm007 I hope this is not correct, The Unit is an excellent show. I heard that the story lines for season five had been planned..?! This sort of show could continue into the generations with new actors and situations coming in over the years. Fingers cross for a 5th season - Lenny — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.74.36.72 (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Bob's callsign
He was also referred to as "Moreno" in some early episodes (Dedication comes to mind, right off the top of my head). Spartan198 (talk) 14:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Confirmed, 17:25 of the episode. Added to article. -- Despayre tête-à-tête 16:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Picture caption
"The Department of the U.S. Army emblem occasionally thought to be the 303rd's unit Insignia", there are episodes that show the front of the building, with the logo, if that's the same logo, we should remove the "occasionally thought" part of the sentence, since it either is, or is not, the logo for The Unit. If it can't be shown to be correct, we should either replace the picture with something else, or remove it. Thoughts? -- Despayre tête-à-tête 23:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070114153530/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/television/feature_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/television/feature_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002576393
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100129154626/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/features/e3ifbfdd1bcb53266ad8d9a71cad261604f
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
When did Wiki become IMDB?
The awards / nominations and crew sections don't belong on Wikipedia, at least not in their current state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomm007 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Alternate callsigns
Does the cast table really need to be stretched out and made hideously large with all the superfluous information regarding alternate callsigns of the operators? Having their widely used callsigns should be more than sufficient, and would streamline this section considerably.