Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010–11 AFC Wimbledon season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Number 57 (talk | contribs) at 08:11, 22 July 2016 (r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

2010–11 AFC Wimbledon season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSEASONS as the team wasn't playing in a WP:FPL; also fails WP:GNG. All those refs look good but they are all WP:ROUTINE (transfer announcements and the like). Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

2010–11 Cambridge United F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Crawley Town F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Darlington F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Gateshead F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Grimsby Town F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Luton Town F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Mansfield Town F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Newport County A.F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2010–11 Wrexham F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Kosack (talk) 08:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per the WP:NSEASONS failure. I enjoyed reading the claim that it was Cambridge's 98th season playing in the Conference National though. Number 57 11:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep even though they are all failures according to the rules, maybe the rules need re-assessing, the fifth tier is majority professional and what is going to happen when the Football League expands in the next few years are these pages going to be valid? Not trying to be awkward but just hate seeing peoples hardwork and passion deleted, but rules are rules i guess. Iantheimp (talk) 12:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Stat dumps that do nothing other than list results and league tables
  2. Are sourced entirely from primary sources, i.e. the clubs own website
  3. Rely heavily on routine match reporting which long-standing consensus agrees is insufficient for notability as this sort of journalism occurs even at very low, local levels.
Fenix down (talk) 07:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]