Talk:Singla

India: West Bengal / Cities / Geography List‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Source needed for "Jatt caste" claim.

I tried to find sources for the claim that Singla is a Jatt caste, but found no support. Please don't restore the page without showing some evidence. --Slashme (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Is Singla a Jatt caste?

Please consider joining the feedback request service.

An editor has requested comments from other editors for this discussion. This page has been added to the following list:

Society, sports, and culture

When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the list. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.

An anon editor who seems to have a dynamic IP keeps changing this article to say that Singla is a Punjabi/Sikh caste, but I can't find any support for this claim. I don't know much about the topic, though, so I'd like some input from others to understand whether this redirect is appropriate. --Slashme (talk) 07:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Singla are a caste from Punjabi-Sikh origin and Singla are found predominantly in the Punjab region of Indian-Subcontinent. Also, no historical evidences as well as no folklorists' support is found that Singla are synonymous to or belong to the Hindu-Agarwal caste group - Singhal. So, I claim, this redirect is not proper and should be suspended. Article Singla can continue to exist as independently and as a stub for now until a substantial historical claim for the redirect is found. 120.56.162.8 (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WHY REDIRECT?

This page can not be made protected without proper evidence for a valid redirect. Else delete this page if nobody has a proper claim. If you want to follow unethical practices then I don't have anything to say. You guys can take leverage from ambiguous redirects without any evidence. Period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.176.184.25 (talk) 07:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]