User talk:Brian in denver

dun

58th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment

I noticed you created a lot of articles about US regiments, including on the modern 58th Infantry Regiment. Could I interest you in creating the article on the Civil War 58th New York Volunteer Infantry Regiment? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you point me to what was deleted, perhaps I could help. I hate it when good content is removed :( If you decide to work on the NY units, I'd love to help. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 18:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was this ever discussed on Wikipedia? I am familiar with some Wikipedia copyright experts, and if what you say is correct, and they were not involved, it might have been a bot/inexperienced editor mistake. I agree with you that US government documents (federal) are usually not copyrighted, and I'd love to help quash the people who claim fake copyright (I hate such profiteers, too). And Wikipedia is indeed a very good place for such information (although some documents may be better of on Wikisource). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 20:00, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reported the issue of potentially improper copyvio deletions to the experts I know. I expect they'll be replying soon. You may want to monitor User_talk:Moonriddengirl#Wronged_editor_.28unfairly_accused_of_copyvio.29.3F. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 21:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

69th Infantry Regiment

Blanking a large page, references and all is unacceptable. I don't know the reasoning, but such an extreme change can't be made without community consensus. If you want to make big changes you should start a discussion on the talk page of this article. INeverCry 17:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

pay attention, the page wasent blanked it it was reverted. read the talk page.

Please mind your language. An edit summary like this is not up to local standards for civility. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appoligize but my frustration at seeing months of research, and transcription undone by people who cant be bothered to read is reaching its peak.

69th Infantry

Hi. Think you may have the wrong person. Cloudbound (talk) 19:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't remember that. Never mind, seems all sorted. Cloudbound (talk) 20:01, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Brian. Cloudbound (talk) 20:15, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully it'll be sorted soon. If there's anything I can do to help, let me know. Cloudbound (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coats of arms pages

Brian in Denver, Thanks for all your additions to the various coats of arms pages. You've really got them looking great! Ocalafla (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

evedently I will have to stop, everytime i add somthing a certain hate america first communist deletes it, on the flimsy excuse that "its somewhere else on the internet". really? then I guess wikipedia is perty pointless. Brian in denver (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please feel free to discuss on this talkpage, on RightCowLeftCoast's, or on mine. The material is very valid and useful, but according to my reading of Wikipedia's rules, the community consensus is that it should be on Wikimedia Commons. Have you considered doing your work there, where other language speakers can access it more easily? Buckshot06 (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:World War I American electronics

Category:World War I American electronics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Amphibian cargo Jeep trailer.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Amphibian cargo Jeep trailer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this crap yet again. every time a new walking ego shows up to re envent the wheel, of the idot bot. its intolerable. if your to stupid to recognize an image out of an Army manual. maybe you shouldent be an editor

Your userpage

Hi Brian in denver. I noticed your userpage may not be in compliance with Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Users are generally given a little bit of freedom to personalize their userpages to a certain degree, but userpages which too closely resemble articles are at risk of being deleted per WP:U5 or via WP:MfD. So, it might be a good idea to move the page to the article namespace if the draft is ready to for article status, or to either the draft namespace or a user subpage if you still want to work on it. Wikipedia's userrspace is not intended be a free web host for hosting content indefinitely and userpages which do not comply with relevant guidelines do get deleted by administrators. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]