Jump to content

User talk:C.Fred

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thelaststory99 (talk | contribs) at 07:03, 26 July 2016 (Hello , reply please?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Hello, you just rolled back a change, from mark as deleted to possible advert. I was following the wiki instructions to ask for help so that it does not read like an advert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelbarry147 (talkcontribs) 19:55, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Michaelbarry147: Which means you missed the instructions in the speedy deletion box that say that you may not remove a speedy delete tag from an article you created yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I should let you know, I have filed SPI report here. Sro23 (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sro23: Yeah, I was already on that angle. I don't see where they are currently abusing multiple accounts or evading a block. If I missed one, though, let me know. —C.Fred (talk) 01:29, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
==Company Profile==

[spam removed] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saaduddin2016 (talkcontribs) 01:48, 18 July 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Saaduddin2016: You can't just repeat the same material that looks like it was copied from a directory over and over. You need to discuss the situation with us and explain how this is a second company. —C.Fred (talk) 01:51, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~hi, she just Twitted recently about being in Toronto. I would have put the reference in but Twitter links aren't accepted by Wikipedia I guess. And I'm friends with one of her friends, so I know she's in Toronto. Winston July 22~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WD82 (talkcontribs) 18:31, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for adding Homework to Namrata Shrestha. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23 July 2016

Hello C.Fred, Can U say that how to upload Google file in wikipedia commons. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@सरोज उप्रेती: Short answer: don't. If you found a picture via a Google search, you probably can't upload it to Wikimedia Commons. —C.Fred (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can we Upload that photo on English Wikipedia? सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 03:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@सरोज उप्रेती: Probably not. There are pretty strict rules about non-free images. Now, that said, an image of the poster of Homework could be uploaded for the movie article. —C.Fred (talk) 03:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can U say the process of keeping license in movie article photo? सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 04:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need Barnstar

Hello C.Fred, I have provided you a barnstar. Now it's your turn to Provide me Barnstar. Please Give me Barnstar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by सरोज उप्रेती (talkcontribs) 05:38, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@सरोज उप्रेती: Barnstars are given as awards, not as items to be trading back and forth. At such time as I see you've done something that warrants one, I'll give one, but I'm not going to hand one out on demand. —C.Fred (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
…Though it seems your actions warrant an indefinite block for sockpuppetry, not a barnstar. —C.Fred (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

remote control

You are wrongfully deleting my contributions to remote control. It is sourced information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.78.47 (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's irrelevant. Your account was blocked; you may not continue to edit without logging in. —C.Fred (talk) 20:08, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What is irrelevent? It made the article more accurate. I have been wrongfully shut out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.78.47 (talk) 20:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to appeal your block. —C.Fred (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Reg my page ... Can you pleae let me know what more informations required

[rehash of article deleted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 22:51, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: You need coverage of her in independent reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 22:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did add other reliable external links which talks about S. Aishwarya and her performance, Some links from news papaer and reviews from blog - Please do let me know what more information is requored — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 23:12, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I Do have few more links to add which i'm waiting to receive from S. Aishwarya, Please do let me know if you need more — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 23:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: What do you mean by receiving the links from Aishwarya? Are you editing the page at her request or on her behalf? Sounds like you might have a conflict of interest. —C.Fred (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you requested for more relevant resources, Have requested Aishwarya to provide more such links - Its me who wanted to create a wiki page . Please do let me know , Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 00:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lathaayappa1982: Still, you shouldn't be needing to request the information from her. If she's notable, there should be published information out there already that you can find through your own searches. —C.Fred (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I agree .. they are already available online and here are few. http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/in-the-big-league/article386947.ece http://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/all-in-the-family/article4077301.ece http://tpanand.blogspot.com.ar/2015/01/saishwarya-rising-star.html https://carnatictimes.com/portfolio/the-musician-makers/ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/MS-was-simply-our-great-grandmother/articleshow/50050678.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/Great-granddaughter-to-perform-with-MS-Subbalakshmis-favourite-tamburas/articleshow/42649037.cms https://indianraga.com/product/maithreem-bhajata-online-module/ As i know Aishwarya personally and its more easier to gather information and which would be more relevant. Do let me know if you need any information

Hello fred, I have added more information to the page , please do let me know, the page is yet work in progress Thanks, Good weekend - :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 04:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC) JFYI - I have also linked MS SUBBULAKSHMI (from wiki) who is the great grand mother of S.Aishwarya Thanks :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lathaayappa1982 (talkcontribs) 00:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the page deleted ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.18.41.214 (talk) 03:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The deleting administrator felt it was unambiguous advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 03:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lowering protection level

Hi C.Fred. I saw that you placed long-term protection on several articles such as New York State Court Officers to fight off an IP vandal who's been disruptively editing law enforcement articles. Would you mind if I remove some of these protections? I recently blocked the range that this vandal was operating from, so the disruption should be gone or greatly reduced. I'm also placing these pages on my watchlist, so if he returns with another range (I've noticed he uses one other, but very infrequently), the protection can always be restored. ~ Rob13Talk 05:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Go for it. Like I said, it just got to the point where the volume of disruption was so great that protection was in order. The rangeblocks should help there, and we can reprotect later if it's needed. —C.Fred (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our Company Profile again edited by someone else.

Hi Cfred,

As i already discussed and debate on the matter regarding "LABEL" section in our singer celebrity profiles you have deleted the section few days ago when you didn't find a suitable resource for it, now its again added don't know from whom but added you can check it in the below mentioned profile of our singer celebrity please have a look.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_to_Eye_(Taher_Shah_song)

Hence we are too much disappointed with this label "BLUE NOTES PRODUCTIONS" as we don't have any connection with this PRODUCTION HOUSE and its services and don't even know about it according to our prospective its just to cash our singer popularity and nothing kindly take a strict action against this and lock our profiles as these both songs ANGEL AND EYE TO EYE solely the property of EYE TO EYE LTD media production company that has been registered in GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and we have all the legitimate proves of both songs copyrights if required so we will show you for your record and confirmation but the company mentioned in this LABEL is totally fake and unauthentic company even don't have any record we have found in social media.

Due to this reason we again request you to kindly remove or replace this company with our legitimate company EYE TO EYE LTD and lock our all three profiles relates to our celebrity to make them secure in future the profiles are mentioned below for your record.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_to_Eye_(Taher_Shah_song)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taher_Shah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_(Taher_Shah_song)


Also share you the legitimate EYE TO EYE LTD company prove of registration in GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN DEPARTMENT.

http://www.secp.gov.pk/ns/company.asp?COMPANY_CODE=0068955&id=

I hope this is enough for you but still you required any further evidence so we will provide you the copyright copy. But delete this fake and unauthentic company from our profile.

Looking forward for your response,

Regards, Syed Affan — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedAffan1 (talkcontribs) 22:49, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SyedAffan1: Addressing each of your concerns in sequence:
First, I have removed the label from Eye to Eye (Taher Shah song). While your request brought the situation to my attention, that's not the reason I removed it. The reason is that no independent reliable source has been presented to show that the song was released on that label. So, it's been removed for not being verifiable. I've added the page to my watchlist, so I'll see future edits as they are made.
Second, no independent reliable source has been presented that Eye to Eye Ltd. is the label on which the song has been released, so it has not been added as the label.
Third, there has not been enough vandalism or other disruption of the articles to justify protecting any of the articles you listed.
Fourth, if you have independent reliable sources to show that Eye to Eye Ltd. holds the rights to those songs, please provide, if possible, links to where they can be verified online. Please note that, since the label is in dispute, the sources really need to be independent; the publishing company's webpage and press releases will not suffice.
Fifth, the registration of the company only shows that the company exists. It does not show what the company does, what it owns, or who it represents.
Finally, based on your repeated use of words like "we", "our singer", and "our profile", it is clear that you have a conflict of interest with these articles, and your future edits are subject to the guidelines on editing when you have a conflict of interest. In short, you should not edit the Taher Shah article, and you should not edit any articles about his songs, albums, or other media.C.Fred (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


@C.Fred: Reply of your Message:

First of all thanks for your editing as this is my main concern to remove or replace the Label into another one.

Secondly, are you asking about the evidence of song production by EYE TO EYE LTD well there is no paper proof i have in my hand right now but i can show you the valid and authentic proof that publicly defines about the production of ANGEL Song that belongs to EYE TO EYE LTD. Please click a below mentioned link of the video and see song credits "Produced By: EYE TO EYE LTD" hence it clearly mentions about the production company, its label and so far all the work done for this song under the supervision of EYE TO EYE LTD. Have a look:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoCrbuM8wmc

Further, an image of song credits is also attached with this message for your confirmation:

File:EYE TO EYE LTD-credits.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SyedAffan1 (talkcontribs) 23:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SyedAffan1: As I said before, it really needs to be an independent source. The video is a self-published source, and there is the theoretical risk of the YouTube link not being authentic. That's why an independent source, with no tie to either company, is preferred. —C.Fred (talk) 00:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , reply please?

Hello C.Fred ,

I sent you message on Tafila Technical University page and waiting your reply , thank you. --Thelaststory99 (talk) 07:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]