Jump to content

User talk:David.moreno72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 103.9.40.132 (talk) at 09:17, 2 August 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

Shared IP

Hi there, noticed you'd left a message about an edit made under the IP 103.9.40.132. This appears to be a shared IP. Edits have been made by multiple users who apparently do not know each other, using this IP. Attempting to contact someone by shared IP can be a bit like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Shared IP's are comparable to the shared use of pre-internet era telephone party-lines, shared with sincerity of intention. (Please note: some internet service providers charge extra fees for assigning fixed IP's. Shared IP's are used by genuine ISP customers in good faith.)

Ampleforth College

Hi David!

I don't quite fully understand why you have reverted my last edits to the schools' article. Everything that I have removed wasn't sourced or wasn't encyclopedic in any way. Remember this is a wikipedia article, not the school's brochure, we need to keep it as neutral as possible. There cannot be any advertisement, specially when it is not even referenced.

Warm regards

--CreiterAdam45z (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions, Saint Ann's School

Hello, I'm writing to you regarding various changes I made to the wikipedia page for Saint Ann's School (New York City), on the basis that my edits "did not appear constructive." However, I can't help but disagree -- many of the changes I made added numerous notable graduates of Saint Ann's School, who have Wikipedia pages themselves, and I don't understand why those edits are not constructive. I respect your decision to revert changes that were unsourced; however, many edits I made that WERE sourced were reverted, which frankly, I find to be unreasonable. Second, I'd like to point out that if you're going to hold this particular Wikipedia page to a certain level of standards in terms of sourcing, I'd suggest you apply similar guidelines to other pages, which is not, at the moment, the case. Consider the Ethical Culture Fieldston School's page, another New York City private school, in which a vast majority of those listed as "notable alumni" are unsourced. Thank you -- I appreciate it! Tmnh07 (talk) 05:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Tmnh07[reply]

First, the school wikilink you provided was incorrect, and so misdirected readers; I have corrected this. Second, I concur with M moreno's edits (reversions): You provide no sources for your edits. (Wikilinks are not sources, see WP:VERIFY.) If you enter names with published articles indicating that an individual is an alum of this school, then experienced editors here will not revert you. Add content without, editors should, and will. The fact that many articles are worse is immaterial; it is no one editors to maintain quality at all articles, and not doing so cannot be a criticism of an effort to maintain compliance with WP:VERIFY at this one. 73.211.138.148 (talk) 05:42, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tmnh07. Thanks for your comments. I do hundreds of edits per day, and I do admit that I make errors. I have double checked the reversions, and it appears I might have thrown the baby out with the bathwater. Yes there are people which should be added, but there are also people who are either unsourced or do not have a Wikipedia article. To be notable, they need at least a Wikipedia article. I apologise for any inconvenience. I would recommend that you make small edits, a bit at a time, which gives other editors time to verify and then if a revert is required, only a small amount is reverted. Keep up the good work. Cheers. David.moreno72 (talk) 05:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Am I reverted just because IP

Why was I reverted at the Eckler major edit—all edits had clear edit summaries, and all the citations were improved to template and complete status. Was it just that I was editing from IP address? Note, in reverting these clear, good edits, you returned the word "infancy" to the lede, which was clearly a misspelling. What was the point? 73.211.138.148 (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP. Thanks for your comments. I have reviewed the reversion and I can't see why I reverted. I use a tool called Huggle and I might have simply pressed the wrong button. It certainly wasn't because you are an IP. My reversion was reverted shortly afterwards so it's rather moot anyway. Sorry for the inconvenience. Keep up the good work. Cheers. David.moreno72 (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reliable resources a first time wiki editing

Need help I just started editing wiki first time. And I've received a message about "reliable resources." I hope I've added reliable resources as it explained, and deleted notification. Please let me know, if I did it right. If I didn't, please help me how to do it right. Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 08:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. I've removed all the unreferenced info. If you want to add a date of birth for example, you will need to provide a reliable source that actually gives his birthdate. If he has published a book, it will have an ISBN, etc, etc. If you have any further questions don't hesitate to ask. Cheers. David.moreno72 (talk) 09:13, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fast response. Do you consider as "reliable source" as Japanese Wikipedia? If so, please refer it. https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%96%B0%E5%9E%A3%E6%B8%85 Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 10:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. Per WP:WINARS, the answer is no. Cheers. David.moreno72 (talk) 10:34, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, does wiki need reference/resource in every detail? Does books prove his existence and other information? Thank you for your help. Muso1student (talk) 10:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just provide reliable sources. If he has a book published it will have an ISBN. If there is no ISBN then it shouldn't be added. David.moreno72 (talk) 10:54, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How about his direct words? Does wiki accept them? Thank you for your help. Muso1student (talk) 11:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. Sure, if they have been published in a reliable source. If you can link to them that would be great. Cheers David.moreno72 (talk) 11:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick response. So, if I edit his profile in wiki and attach a reference, that is OK then? When I edited first time, I put his profile from his book. At that point, I didn't understand wiki system of editing. Sorry about that. So, I can put back his profile in wiki and put that recourse info, right? Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. That should be OK. Cheers David.moreno72 (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help

Thank you for your help. Appreciated. Muso1student (talk) 12:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disha Patani DOB

Hi David,

Disha Patani participated in Miss Indore 2013 contest where every contestant has to reveal their age. She turned 20 in 2012. Her official facebook page has a video of HERSELF on her Birthday thanking fans (13 June, 2016). https://www.facebook.com/DishaToabh/videos/604453726391043/

This is her video where she won Pantaloon Fresh Face in 2012 and she HERSELF confirms she is from Bareilly and a student of BTech in Lucknow University - 2012. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1iQ2o1ilk8

What more can be reliable than the actor herself confirming details in videos? She made a special video to thank fans on her birthday and her fans know 13 June is her birthday. Her d.ob is 100% confirmed as 13 June, 1992.

As for birth year, I dont why her fans on wikipedia are ashamed of revealing it but here is the video from 2012 where she was the first runner up confirming her as 19 and she turned 20 the same year. All her interviews given since 2012, confirm her birth year as 1992.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXNi7RDe8ys

http://www.mazale.in/disha-patani-height-age-career-personal-life-biography/ http://www.bollywoodpapa.com/bollywood-actors/tiger-shroff/8-amazing-facts-about-tiger-shroffs-secret-girlfriend-disha-patani https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1588976084755945&id=1584276958559191 http://celebsbikini.pictures/disha-patani-latest-bikini-pics-hot-images-hd-bikini-wallpapers/

If there is still hesitation, she can be contacted on her official facebook page to confirm 1992 as her birth year. It was visible for a long time till Dec 2015 when her birth year started going missing. I don't understand the references used are also from internet pages then why are these not considered valid? References calling her "Tiger Shroff's girlfriend" are not reliable as Tiger Shroff and Disha Patani have NEVER confirmed their relationship. These need to be removed if internet pages are unreliable! "MS Dhoni - The Untold Story: Tiger Shroff's girlfriend Disha Patani bags a role in the biopic". indiatoday.com. 6 January 2016. Retrieved 26 February 2016. "MS Dhoni - The Untold Story: Tiger Shroff's girlfriend Disha Patani bags a role in the biopic : Bollywood, News - India Today". indiatoday.intoday.in. Retrieved 2016-01-06. MS Dhoni - The Untold Story: Tiger Shroff's girlfriend Disha Patani bags a role in the biopic Disha Patani to romance Jackie Chan in Kung Fu Yoga — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.59.28.99 (talk) 13:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you for your comments. What I saw was a note 'Must be attributed to a reliable published source with an established reputation for fact-checking. No blogs. No IMDb. No public records. See WP:BLPPRIVACY' being replaced with an unsourced DOB, in direct contradiction with the note. Those notes are there for a reason, but it's rather moot now as the page has been protected because of the numerous unsourced changes. Thank-you David.moreno72 (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion Kebumen City

Hi. I edited the page Kebumen_City page. I removed several texts that was not relevant to the page, because the scope should be different to Kebumen_Regency. In addition, I found similar texts between those two pages, e.g. Kebumen leader, and mass media, which were also removed from Kebumen City page. Finally, I updated the population number based on the newest result in 2014. So, could you explain why the article was reverted? Thanks. --Rupert.kidright (talk) 02:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rupert.kidright. Thanks for your comments. I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your changes and my revert will remain in place. Since you are close to being involved in an edit war I would not recommend making any changes to the page but instead seek a consensus on the talk page. Thank-you David.moreno72 (talk) 04:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank David.moreno72 for your response and suggestion. Yes, I am aware about edit war and I have tried to avoid it by trying to seeking a consensus on the talk page and talking on the previous editor's talk page. However, the previous editor (not you) just reverted the page without any explanation. That's why I tried to edit the page again. Anyway, I think I will leave this page as it is, following your suggestion. I'm sorry for this trouble. Thank you again. --Rupert.kidright (talk) 05:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

about "Notice about sources"

Hi, David.moreno72 Thank you for helping me earlier. However, I have received "Notice about sources" that saying the resource I provided is not enough. I thought it was OK from your approval. This Kiyoshi Arakaki's profile was quoted from his book that published and showed in the overview at this site; http://www.barnesandnoble.com/enwiki/w/the-secrets-of-okinawan-karate-kiyoshi-arakaki/1112447331#productInfoTabs I had cited this URL earlier, however, it is gone now. Please help me. Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 05:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. When you said 'I put his profile from his book' I was under the impression that the profile was an extract of the book, but after viewing the Barnes & Noble link, I can see that was not the case, and yes the highly experienced administrator who removed the link was correct. The profile was part of an unreferenced promotional blurb and so cannot be used. Sorry about any confusion. Cheers David.moreno72 (talk) 07:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your help. Well I don't know what to do anymore. I just hope the site will not be deleted. Thank you. Sincerely Muso1student (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, David.moreno72. I have a question about attaching a hyperlink. There is a Japanese wiki site about this Kiyoshi Arakaki. Is is OK to attach the URL to his name in Japanese? Like this one below in Japanese Kiyoshi Arakaki (Japanese: 新垣清); born Oct. 17, 1954, attaching this below to his name https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%96%B0%E5%9E%A3%E6%B8%85 Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

check website now

David.moreno72,check now , Tafila Technical University website http://www.ttu.edu.jo/index.php/en/ , removed the line ,

request to restore my last edits on : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tafila_Technical_University ,

--Thelaststory99 (talk) 08:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thelaststory99. I just checked and it still says 'Tafila Technical University © 2016 | Development and design : Ateyah ALbdour' I even checked on a different browser just to make sure there was no cached copy, and it was still there. I can't revert even if the copyright was removed as it may constitute plagiarism. Please carefully read WP:FREECOPYING, WP:PLAG and WP:CS before making any further edits. Thank-you David.moreno72 09:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Asher

Dear David, Please add Michael Asher to your list of Fellows of the Royal Society of Literature (please confirm with RSL Official Page - Michael Asher, Fellow since 19960 Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.41.111.40 (talk) 06:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the source and have done so. David.moreno72 06:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

FYI, I just reverted a user who blanked your user page and added this message. You may want to re-add it here, but I wasn't sure. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 14:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

creation of page Patrick Johnson Mendie is my personal academic page

Please this is to bring to your kind attention that the said page Patrick Johnson Mendie is my personal page, and the said page is to promotes my academic ambitions so as to lay a solid foundation to the general public. In other words, i created page for myself with a reportive language to enable further inputs by others. thus, i owned no permission by any body to write about myself o a page at the Wikipedia. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zealot24xt (talkcontribs)

Hi Zealot24xt. Please do not vandalise my user page. If you wish to contest the CSD please take it to the talk page of the article you created. I also notice that your page has already been deleted 3 times previously. If you continue to recreate deleted pages your actions may be taken as being disruptive, and you may be blocked from making any further edits. Thank-you. David.moreno72 16:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help for editing

Hi, David.moreno72. You have been helping me so much.

Now I've got a notice of deletion. I am so confused and I feel like I am attacked by "Mdtemp" because Mdtemp is saying "I'm an MMA fan" which I assume that Mdtemp is saying every martial artists has to be a member of MMA.

I am not just putting his books in Wikipedia. I am trying to establish his recognition in English. Is it not good things to do?

Please help me. Thank you. Muso1student (talk) 02:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muso1student. Wikipedia has strict policies on biographies of living people, and the first of those is that they need to be notable per WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. If these rules were not in place Wikipedia would quickly lose it's unique appeal as it would soon be overflowing with puffed up and unverifiable biographies that no one would ever be interested in anyway. The other key aspect of Wikipedia is consensus, and with that in mind you have the opportunity to vote and make your case on whether an article should be deleted. I would recommend adding a vote to the AFD discussion with a detailed explanation on why, and then to respect whatever the result is. Thank-you David.moreno72 04:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Cheryshev

What was wrong with my edit? He has both Russian, and Spanish citizenship, therefore he is Russian-Spanish. Please undo your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.163.46 (talk) 06:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 69.196.163.46. I don't see any mention of his alleged Spanish citizenship in the article, nor did you provide a reliable source to verify. May I suggest that you provide a reliable source regarding his Spanish citizenship. Thank-you. David.moreno72 06:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

0.999... = 1 page.

Hi David,

I'm quite bemused by your negative assessment (of the citation I provided) that the person cited "does not understand limits". My reading of this proof is that Limits are not part of it, they are simply part of a OP discussion leading up to the proof.

Did he misspell the word "Limit" or something? What petty part of his post matters so much to you that you refuse to honour the proof? Its absolutely brilliant. People are human, you know, and its just a amateur blog. Its not pretending to be an academic journal. But how much more impressive is that!

And where exactly does it say in Wikipedia rules that a blog URL is not sufficient as a citation source? Funny, I see them everywhere else, but not on this page. Why not?

If you start applying rules of your own then THAT breaches the Wikipedia guidelines, my friend, because your interfering with the free expression of information that is in the public interest to know. That means your wasting my time by not carrying out the spirit and intent of Wikipedia. God help you sunshine if this guy gets published in the academic journals, but you knocked it back over some petty excuse that amounts only to the fact that it hasn't been peer reviewed (yet).

Therefore kindly be more specific and substantiate your position. What, in particular, makes you think this blog poster "does not understand limits" so egregiously that it renders his proof of the question "0.999... < 1" unfit for citation in Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abunyip (talkcontribs) 11:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Abunyip. You have the wrong person. David.moreno72 11:10, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Abunyip: The remark about limits really was from another editor, not from David. You can verify this from the page histories, if you like. -- The Anome (talk) 18:44, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No I don't. I did nothing wrong. If you go around recklessly accusing people you will end up paranoid. Stop. Think logically. Then act wisely. But don't just accuse people.Alexander Bunyip (talk) 16:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Victor Perez

Hello thank for your message. Actually I'm totally new as contributor to Wp, sorry for my mistakes. By the way I have not properly understood yet how to add a citation, as I'm using my phone now. Could you please check www.tedxvicenza.com to have the reference needed and add my note? Many thanks Federico — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miotz77 (talkcontribs) 12:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reverting everything

Hi David, you seem to dislike my edits. They are good faith attempts at improvements. It is very disheartening. They are mostly copy edits and tightening of wooly language. You just seem to be doing blanket reverts. I'm not sure why you are so confrontational. 69.86.6.150 (talk) 15:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Airé

Why is the page nominated for deletion? All social media citations have been removed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.59.2 (talk) 12:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 197.211.59.2. The subject in question does not meet WP:NMG. Please also take note of the notice at the top of the page where it says 'if you came here because I added a CSD to your page, take your dispute to the talk page of the article.' Thank-you David.moreno72 12:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page Deletion

I am new on wikipedia. What exactly is the problem with my article 'Aquevix'. It's all about my organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aquevix solutions (talkcontribs) 13:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Article deleted, user blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

ive got reference for which you removed the text. how can i cite reference?? wii you help me to do that?? Sakib Hasan Tusher (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs379/en/ this is the reference .now what i have to do??Sakib Hasan Tusher (talk) 17:23, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sakib Hasan Tusher. Although the reference does support one of the claims that you made, it may simply be the wrong place to add the information, especially since it's present on another page. The page which you added the information is more of a top level, broad based view of a healthy human skeleton. There are probably thousands of different conditions and maladies that involve bones, and to list and detail them all on a single page would become to unwieldy. Don't get too disheartened. There is always work to be done on Wikipedia. Thanks David.moreno72 12:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion notice

Dear David, thanks for your contribution, the article about Syed Saqib Imad is nominated for deletion. Dear this article have place in low priority Khyber Pukhtunkhuwa articles and also Middle eastern pakhtoon people articles. The nominated person is a youth activist in Pakistan KPK province and have done a lot of social works and doing the same in the area, vision of him is to use the youth in right way and help to make the world peaceful, help as we can. The vision is good and appriciatable please review and help to improve the article. Thanks again and best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muhammadalijan92 (talkcontribs) 08:47, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muhammadalijan92. I'm sure that Syed Saqib Imad is a nice guy and that he has made some worthy contributions to his community, it's just that Wikipedia has a number of policies that need to be followed before a biography can be created. First and foremost is that the person must meet notability criteria. To see these criteria I highly recommend reading WP:BIO. Second, and probably equally important, is that the information is verifiable with reliable third party sources. Sorry about that, but those are the rules of Wikipedia. David.moreno72 11:44, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear David please give me chance to improve the article. Thanks--Muhammadalijan92 (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Muhammadalijan92. I would suggest that you provide information from third party news sources, or information that denotes the subject's notability as per WP:BIO if you want the page to remain. If you do not, no amount of 'improvement' will help. Thanks David.moreno72 13:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not cite any sources

Hello David.moreno72 , on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tafila_Technical_University , why I still have this ->(" This article does not cite any sources. ") , even I added many sources ?

thanks in advance ,--Thelaststory99 (talk) 09:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thelaststory99. The note that you speak of was added to the page shortly after it was created, back in June 2008. Even when references are added, the notice will stay in place as I don't think there is a bot that removes them. They have to be removed manually. Now that the article has references feel free to remove the notice, making sure that you leave an explanation in the edit summary. Thank-you David.moreno72 11:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok David.moreno72 I see now , thanks friend !--Thelaststory99 (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I reverted

Hi I was reverted on the news page and I don't see what I did wrong? thanks!

Hi CodeKeem. There are a number of problems. Firstly, given your username it may appear as promotion. Secondly, the page is more of a top level view. If one was to include all the YouTubers that do some sort of news, the entire page would be inundated. Quite simply, it just wasn't appropriate. Thank-you. David.moreno72 08:50, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your work on They Don't Know (Jason Aldean album). Nice job! ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 12:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThePlatypusofDoom. Many thanks. Great to know my hard work is appreciated. David.moreno72 13:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, David, i noticed you have deleted my edits on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperMap due to lack of reference, could you please restore those first then I will add the relevant reference? Currently, I cannot restore the page I edited. Thanks Seanzhang1015 (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seanzhang1015. Sorry but can't do. The material you have been copying and pasting has a number of issues. First, since it has been copied and pasted, it is a breach of copyright. I also notice that this is not the first time that you have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Repeated additions of copyrighted material may lead to you being blocked from editing. And second, the material is promotional. Again, repeated addition of material that is promotional may lead to you from being blocked from editing. Thank-you David.moreno72 02:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Don't bother. User blocked for advertising and copyvios and I'm about to revdel. --NeilN talk to me 02:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]