User talk:Thelaststory99

Thelaststory99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thelaststory99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

talk pages

Please don't remove threads from someone else's talk page. Yes, I know you started the thread, but the user had answered it so it's not appropriate for you top blank it. Meters (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok , didn't know that , thanks :)--Thelaststory99 (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. David.moreno72 03:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tafila Technical University

I have removed the content you added to the above article. The Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) is not a compatible license with this wiki. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sorry, — Diannaa (talk) 19:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is my fault, I was not aware version 4.0 is not backwards-compatible with version 3.0. You need to license it under version 3.0 instead, you can use this banner for that:

<a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />This work is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License</a>.

– nyuszika7h (talk) 20:16, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

nyuszika7h , don't worry , its ok , but i don't know what is the next requirement that will come as surprise :), thanks--Thelaststory99 (talk) 16:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Tafila Technical University. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Thelaststory99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now only me will edit from this IP , why still blocked?

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Now only me will edit from this IP , why still blocked? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Now only me will edit from this IP , why still blocked? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Now only me will edit from this IP , why still blocked? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}