Sun Language Theory
| Part of a series on |
| Linguistics |
|---|
 Portal |
The Sun Language Theory (Template:Lang-tr) was a Turkish nationalist pseudoscientific linguistic hypothesis developed in Turkey in the 1930s that proposed that all human languages are descendants of one proto-Turkic primal language. The theory proposed that because this primal language had close phonemic resemblances to Turkish, all other languages can essentially be traced back to Turkic roots. According to the theory, the Central Asian worshippers, who wanted to salute the omnipotence of the sun and its life-giving qualities, had done so by transforming their meaningless blabbering into a coherent set of ritual utterings, and language was born, hence the name.[1]
Origins
Influences on the theory included:
- the ideas of the French historian Hilaire de Barenton, expressed in "L'Origine des Langues, des Religions et des Peuples", that all languages originated from hieroglyphs and cuneiform used by Sumerians[2]
- a paper of the Austrian linguist Dr. Hermann F. Kvergić of Vienna entitled "La psychologie de quelques éléments des langues Turques" ("The Psychology of Some Elements of the Turkic Languages")[3]
The founder and first president of the Republic of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, not only gave the theory official backing and material support[4] but also was himself a very important contributor to its development, "though clearly he did not do all the donkey work".[5]
Tenets
As described in a 1936 The New York Times article on the curriculum of the newly opened School of Language, History and Geography of Ankara University:[2]
claims that the Sumerians, being Turks, originating in Central Asia, all languages also consequently originated there and first used by the Turks. the first language, in fact, came into being in this way: Prehistoric man, i.e., Turks in the most primitive stage, was so struck by the effects of the sun on life that he made of it a deity whence sprang all good and evil. Thence came to him light, darkness, warmth and fire, with it were associated all ideas of time: height, distance, movement, size, and give expression to his feelings the sun was thus the first thing to which a name was given. It was "ag" (pronounced agh), and from this syllable all words in use today are derived. This, briefly, is the theory about the "sun language," and with the new conception of Turkish history it will be taught in the new Angora school.
In short, based upon a helio-centric view of the origin of civilization and human languages, the theory claimed that the Turkish language was the language which all civilized languages derived from.[6]
Some of the words provided with false Turkish etymologies through the practice of goropism were school, which was attributed to the Turkish word okul (school); God, attributed to the Turkish kut (blessing); Bulletin from belleten (to learn by heart); Electric from Uyghur yaltrık (shine).[5][7]
According to linguist Ghil'ad Zuckermann, "it is possible that the Sun Language Theory was adopted by Atatürk in order to legitimize the Arabic and Persian words which the Turkish language authorities did not manage to uproot. This move compensated for the failure to provide a neologism for every foreignism/loanword."[8]
See also
- Adamic language
- Johannes Goropius Becanus
- Japhetic theory
- Khazar theory
- Lemurian Tamil
- Nostratic languages
Notes
- ^ Aytürk, İlker (November 2004). "Turkish Linguists against the West: The Origins of Linguistic Nationalism in Atatürk's Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies. 40 (6). London: Frank Cass & Co (Routledge): 1–25. doi:10.1080/0026320042000282856. ISSN 0026-3206. OCLC 86539631.
- ^ a b "Turks Teach New Theories". New York Times. Istanbul. 1936-02-09.
- ^ Laut, Jens Peter (2002). "Noch einmal zu Dr. Kvergić" (PDF reprinted online). Turkic Languages (in German). 6. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz Verlag: 120–133. ISSN 1431-4983. OCLC 37421320. Retrieved 2007-12-05.
- ^ See Speros Vryonis. The Turkish State and History: Clio meets the Grey Wolf, 2nd Ed. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1993.
- ^ a b Lewis, Geoffrey (2002). The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. Oxford University Press.
- ^ Cemal Kafadar, Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State, Published by University of California Press, 1996. pg 163.
- ^ Lewis, Geoffrey (11 February 2002). "The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success". http://www.turkishlanguage.co.uk/. Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul: The Jarring Lecture.
{{cite web}}: External link in|website= - ^ Zuckermann, Ghil'ad (2003). Language Contact and Lexical Enrichment in Israeli Hebrew. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 165. ISBN 978-1403917232..
Further reading
- Arkman, Ceren (2006), The Launching of the Turkish Thesis of History: A Close Textual Analysis (PDF), M.A. Thesis, Sabanci University, archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2007, retrieved 2007-12-05
{{citation}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - Aydingün, Ayşegül; Aydingün, İsmail (2004). "The Role of Language in the Formation of Turkish National Identity and Turkishness". Nationalism & Ethnic Politics. 10 (3). London: Frank Cass & Co (Routledge): 415–432. doi:10.1080/13537110490518264. ISSN 1353-7113. OCLC 86549020.
- Dilaçar, Agop (1936). Les bases Bio-Psychologiques de la Théorie Güneş Dil. Istanbul: Fazilet Basimevi. OCLC 162658746. Template:Fr icon Template:Tr icon
- Karpat, Kemal H. (2004). Studies on Turkish Politics and Society: Selected Articles and Essays. Social, Economic, and Political Studies of the Middle East, vol. 94. Leiden, Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill. ISBN 90-04-13322-4. OCLC 52334897.
- Kıbrıs, Güldeniz (2005), Creating Turkishness: An Examination of Turkish Nationalism Through Gök-Börü (PDF), M.A. Thesis, Sabanci University, archived from the original (PDF) on January 19, 2010, retrieved 2007-12-05
{{citation}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - Lewis, Geoffrey (1999). The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-823856-8. OCLC 41137543.
- Poulton, Hugh (1997). Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic. London: C. Hurst & Co. ISBN 1-85065-326-7. OCLC 37787056.
- Shaw, Wendy M.K. (2004). "Whose Hittites, and Why? Language, Archaeology, and the Quest for the Original Turks". In Michael L. Galaty and Charles Watkinson (eds.) (ed.). Archaeology Under Dictatorship. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. pp. 131–154. ISBN 0-306-48508-7. OCLC 54685395.
{{cite book}}:|editor=has generic name (help) - Vryonis, Speros (1993). The Turkish State and History: Clio meets the Grey Wolf, 2nd Ed. Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies.
- Webster, Donald Everett (1939). The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation. Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science. OCLC 404655.
- Main ideas of Sun Language Theory Template:Tr icon
- 1936 Sun Language Commission's Report Template:Tr icon Template:Fr icon