Jump to content

User talk:MarioProtIV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MarioProtIV (talk | contribs) at 15:21, 18 August 2016 (→Affected by unrelated IP block). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, MarioProtIV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Acabashi (talk) 15:14, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Black dwarf sun

Do you have a reference for that time? Because it should go in the timeline if true. Serendipodous 20:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New additions to this list have to be cited. Otherwise they can't be added, whether or not they are correct. If you have citations for any new information, please provide them, then the info can go in.Serendipodous 20:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Kkj11210. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Poincaré recurrence theorem because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KJ click here 23:16, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013 nor'easter

In your edit summary, you said the following: "it has been stated that we are organizing it like this. please discuss on talk page." - Except it hasn't been stated anywhere. Please explain. Dustin (talk) 22:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing

Please make sure to properly attribute images when you upload them on the commons. Claiming images as your own work violates copyright laws if the image is protected, and is heavily frowned upon if it's in the public domain. Your recent upload of the RSI map for the January 2016 United States blizzard was listed as your own work when it was created by NOAA and released in news statement on January 26. I went ahead and corrected the information (as well as three other uploads which were NASA images: [1], [2], [3]) but please make sure to properly do this yourself in the future. If you need any assistance on how to attribute them, feel free to ask me any time. Regards, Cyclonebiskit (chat) 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Coast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:DopplerRadarDecember272015.gif

Thanks for uploading File:DopplerRadarDecember272015.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 North American winter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Coast
Early February 2016 nor'easter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Early December 2014 nor'easter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to East Coast and Jamesville
2014–15 North American winter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to East Coast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't claim work as your own when it's not

I warned you before about this nicely, but obviously that didn't work. Stop claiming material as your own work when it's clearly not yours (ex: File:Blizzard2016Radar.gif). I keep seeing you upload images to the commons that are from NOAA/NASA/etc and list yourself as the author and provide incorrect licensing. This is blatant plagiarism/theft and it is not tolerated on Wikipedia. I'll be forced to start deleting all of the improperly licensed/attributed images if you don't correct them soon. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 23:52, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Late March 2016 North American blizzard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Plains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 North American winter, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sleet and Mid-Atlantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 North American winter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sierra Mountains (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winters and winter storms

I've been a bit inactive as of late for a few reasons. Among these reasons are schoolwork and lack of interest. Where I live, there was a historically low amount of winter storms and high temperatures, and when I am less affected by an event, I have less motivation. I just thought I'd leave a message thanking you for the additions you have made to the 2013–14, 2014–15, and 2015–16 North American winter articles. I had been meaning to pick up on those articles, so I appreciate the help. Since nobody else seems interested, I'd like to ask what you think about 2014–15 North American winter#Northeastern United States. I feel that it is too long and contains too many statistics. I haven't established any standards as to what is worth including in terms of records, but I can tell you that that section definitely is not following any standards. Do you have any ideas? I even tried to have the article peer reviewed at one time, but nobody ever responded to my request. If you have any suggestions, please let me know! Any help is appreciated; thanks! Dustin (talk) 01:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I actually went as far as making one for the 2012–13 winter as there were quite a few interesting events during that winter such as the November nor'easter, the February nor'easter (aka Blizzard of 2013), and the March nor'easter. It's actually still in progress with the events, so any help or ideas would be acceptable. The other winter articles I spiced up since there wasn't much events in the 2013–14 article, and 2014–15 was lacking some of the major events.
For the records section in 2014–15, I'm thinking it could either be split into its own article, or it could just be coalesced into a table sorted in the order of "Record, Type, New Record, Location, Date". I am still thinking on how to sort it out. But yeah thanks for the compliment! --MarioProtIV (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you hadn't created the "2012–13" article, I likely would have, so I appreciate the effort. I hope we can sort out the "Records" section of the winter articles before too long. Thanks for responding! Dustin (talk) 02:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Early March 2015 United States winter storm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Schofield Pass and High Plains
2015–16 North American winter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Central Plains

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop just re-adding your material to Timeline of the far future without discussing it

There are a number of issues with your addition that you have not addressed.

1. The runaway greenhouse evaporating the oceans is already described at 1 billion years. Since this event cannot happen twice, there would need to be some discussion as to which timeframe was more likely.

2. You mention that life will die out. But the article already says that life will completely die out in 2.8 billion years.

3. You say that the Sun's luminosity will be at 30-40 percent of its present value, which means it will have decreased, not increased. Serendipodous 17:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, for the 3 statements:
1. The runaway greenhouse effect commences around 3.5–4.5 billion years, then the atmosphere heats up as a result.
2. Any remaining life that somehow survived up to that point will die, but I'm likely to remove that actually.
3. That was a typo, I'll fix that to say "30–40% more then it is today". --MarioProtIV (talk) 18:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The first point just restates what you wrote. It doesn't answer my question. How can the runaway greenhouse effect commence twice? If you're having trouble understanding this, let me quote the entry for 1 billion years:

"The Sun's luminosity has increased by 10 percent, causing Earth's surface temperatures to reach an average of ~320 K (47 °C, 116 °F). The atmosphere will become a "moist greenhouse", resulting in a runaway evaporation of the oceans.[53] Pockets of water may still be present at the poles, allowing abodes for simple life."

If this statement is true, then the statement you posted is false. If the statement you posted is true, then this statement is false. They cannot both be right. So either you misread the source, or the sources are contradicting each other. Serendipodous 20:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From what I understand, the greenhouse effect starts at 1 billion, and seemingly goes until 3.5–4.5 billion. If it bugs you still, I can just remove that first line and have it say the following:
"The amount of water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases to 40%. Combined with the luminosity of the Sun reaching 30–40% more then its present-day value, will result in the Earth's surface temperature skyrocketing to 1,000–2,400 °F (538–1,316 °C), enough to melt surface rock. This essentially makes the planet much like how Venus is today."
--MarioProtIV (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. Serendipodous 21:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of potentially habitable exoplanets, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You removed then re-added information on that page, twice, without indicating the reasons in the edit summaries. In the future, please always make use of the edit summary. Dhrm77 (talk) 01:35, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For your contribution to North American weather articles :D Jdcomix (talk) 11:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:United States spring storms

Template:United States spring storms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. United States Man (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kepler-62f

Hey there, this is just to let you know that I mostly reverted your recent edits to Kepler-62f. I feel bad about it because you obviously worked hard on it, but it seemed to me that the subsection you added violated the WP:OR policy. In other words, it seemed that the subsection was your own original thoughts that you based on information in the cited source. In writing articles, we aren't allowed to synthesize and extrapolate from sources - we have to stick to just the conclusions stated in the sources. I left the link you added to Habitability of K-type main-sequence star systems, which I think is really helpful and improves the article a lot. A2soup (talk) 06:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please bring your ideas to the talk page

Timeline of the far future is a featured list; many people who are not you have reviewed it in depth. If you assume there is something fundamentally wrong with it that only you can see, you are probably wrong. Serendipodous 20:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Thread

Just a quick suggestion. In the future WP:AIV might be a better forum it would also be a faster response. And in the future please remember to notify users with the ANI Notice template {{subst:ANI-notice}}). Generally administrators won't act if a user hasn't been warned though. I'd suggest in the future after reverting vandalism to place a user warning template on the user's talk page. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, will do in the future. --MarioProtIV (talk) 23:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

Hi there. When you speedy tag a page, as you did in this edit, it is a good idea to notify the user at their talk page. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:03, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (HD 240237 b) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating HD 240237 b, MarioProtIV!

Wikipedia editor Mooseandbruce1 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good job. Keep at creating these exoplanet articles!

To reply, leave a comment on Mooseandbruce1's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kepler-419

About italian-wiki and edits in italian.wiki, speak in italian.wiki, not here. Ok?--Kirk39 (talk) 03:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Kepler-432

Hi, I'm Lithopsian. MarioProtIV, thanks for creating Kepler-432!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. cite journal accepts an arxiv parameter which automatically formats a link for you. In addition, if you give a bibcode or doi, Citation Bot will automatically expand a complete citation.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Lithopsian (talk) 20:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 20:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Affected by unrelated IP block

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MarioProtIV (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because the location/IP range I am editing from (23.20.0.0/1) is blocked for a different reason, and this goes to affect my editing activities on here. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Requesting an IP address block exemption, because the location/IP range I am editing from (23.20.0.0/1) is blocked for a different reason, and this goes to affect my editing activities on here. '''''[[User:MarioProtIV|MarioProtIV]]''''' (<sup>[[User talk:MarioProtIV|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/MarioProtIV|contribs]]</sub>) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting an IP address block exemption, because the location/IP range I am editing from (23.20.0.0/1) is blocked for a different reason, and this goes to affect my editing activities on here. '''''[[User:MarioProtIV|MarioProtIV]]''''' (<sup>[[User talk:MarioProtIV|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/MarioProtIV|contribs]]</sub>) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Requesting an IP address block exemption, because the location/IP range I am editing from (23.20.0.0/1) is blocked for a different reason, and this goes to affect my editing activities on here. '''''[[User:MarioProtIV|MarioProtIV]]''''' (<sup>[[User talk:MarioProtIV|talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/MarioProtIV|contribs]]</sub>) 14:47, 18 August 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

That IP address range belongs to Amazon AWS. We don't generally allow editing via a VPN or a webhost. Do you have a specific reason for needing to edit via a proxied connection? (Please understand the tone of this question is 'inquiring', certainly not 'accusational') --Yamla (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not actually at where I usually edit from (NJ), and I'm in DC rn (vacation xD). Anyways, I am really active on here (my edits say for themselves), and daily I make anywhere from 4–20 edits depending what page I'm working on. Not being able to because of an unfortunate IP range block is a bit nerve-wracking as I can't be there to add new info or revert an unsourced addition (or just plain vandalism). I mostly do my edits relating to exoplanets, as that is my area of interest. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 15:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarioProtIV&oldid=735091965"