Talk:George Spafford Richardson

George Spafford Richardson has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 19, 2016.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Military / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Polynesia: Samoa Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Samoa (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / South Pacific / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	World War I task force

Common name

I thought that the article is a bit thin on content for a GA candidate and thus looked into his local body career. From my brief reading, it would appear that his common name is George Richardson. Thoughts? Schwede66 09:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are already quite a few George Richardson articles, so I think the middle name is a useful disambiguator. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be a reasonably common misconception that middle names can be used for disambiguation when that is clearly not the case: "If there is no usual form of conventional disambiguation, place a disambiguating tag in parentheses after the name." If the common name does not include the middle name, it shouldn't be used for dab purposes. Schwede66 04:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Material for possible article expansion

This funny story was in the newspapers in 1924. Schwede66 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 August 2016

It has been proposed in this section that George Spafford Richardson be renamed and moved to George Richardson (New Zealand military leader).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

George Spafford Richardson → George Richardson (New Zealand military leader) – As mentioned above and since researched further by reading contemporary newspapers, he was not generally known by his middle name; "George Richardson" was his WP:COMMONNAME. As explained above, middle names cannot be used for disambiguation according to WP:NCPDAB. "military leader" would be a suitable dab, but there's also an Indian military leader of this name so I suggest that we add "New Zealand" to the dab, too. Schwede66 08:31, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support this move 2601:541:4305:C70:8CA1:4165:CEFB:318D (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Middle names can be used as disambiguators per WP:NCPDAB and WP:MIDDLENAME. He appears in the NZDB, the Encyclopaedia of New Zealand, the National Archives and London Gazette all using his middle name. A search on Trove yields every mention of him using the middle name! So it was the conventional form of disambiguation per WP:NCPDAB, and was used often enough to qualify for WP:COMMONNAME as well. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding NCPDAB, what it does say is as follows (italics as per the original): "Adding given names, or their abbreviations, merely for disambiguation purposes (if that format of the name is not commonly used to refer to the person) is not advised." Hawkeye7, where do you see that it can be used for disambiguation, please? Regarding DNZB (not NZDB), you need to know that every single of the 3000 entries lists the subject by their full name. No exception. Their general convention is to mention the common name only once or twice in the article; most commonly in the last paragraph, less commonly during the early life section, but sometimes not at all but they refer to the subject by surname only. The latter is the case here. The London Gazette always uses full names, so this cannot be used to establish commons names. Regarding your Trove search, I note that you used 'George Spafford Richardson' as your search term, so what do you expect to find other than entries that use the full name? Schwede66 21:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, as above. I note that the story from 1924, linked to in the previous section regarding his pension, recites his middle name. Zawed (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I never said that the full version of the name isn't in use in contemporary sources. What I said is that the use of "George Richardson" is more common than "George Spafford Richardson". Much more common, in fact. Schwede66 21:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]