Talk:Whitby

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whitby article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3

Whitby has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 12, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
October 28, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Whitby is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Find sources notice

Semi-protection

I have semi-protected the article due to ongoing vandalism. Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has ten or more edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. IP and new users can request edits to a semi-protected page by proposing them on its talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 11:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can this article be un-semi-protected? Article has been semi-protected for quite awhile from what I can tell (2011). I would like to make an addition to the Literature section to include the novella titled "Whitby".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.113.120 (talk• contribs) 08:04, 27 March 2013‎

Did you by any chance see the section above about semi protection? Creating an account and becoming autoconfirmed will let you edit. If for some reason you don't want to create an account you could post it to the talk page and ask another editor to add it to the article. While this isn't exactly what you were asking for I hope this helps. Thanks Fraggle81 (talk) 17:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like articles being protected from editing, however, thist article - perhaps because of Whitby's association with Dracula - attracts a fair bit of harmful edits. Protection had been previously placed, then lifted, and had to be placed again. It is unfortunate, but some articles are best left protected. In addition, this is a Good Article, and is in decent shape. As Fraggle says, people can register an account, or make an edit suggestion on this page. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 07:15, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the "Culture, Media and Sport" section to say "For over four decades the town has hosted the Whitby Folk Week, and since 1993 the bi-annual Whitby Gothic Weekend for members of the Goth subculture." Change is indicated in bold, note it includes the comma after "Folk Week". Also, there are references to the NYMR service using "steam engines", this should be "steam and heritage diesel locomotives".

Done -- TOW talk 06:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whitby in the historic county of the North Riding of Yorkshire

Would be nice if the following bit of info could be posted.

Historically part of the North Riding of Yorkshire.

Edit request on 22 September 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Whitby Town Football Club is semi-professional, not amateur.

94.192.128.116 (talk) 15:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Fraggle81 (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA check

I am working my way through the Good articles listed at Places; having a quick look to see if they still meet the Good article criteria. I have landed on this article. After I've had a quick look, I'll leave a note here indicating if I have concerns or not.

In general, I see the process as this: 1) Give the article a quick look to see if there are obvious issues: maintenance tags, unsourced sections, excessive media, etc, resolving any minor issues as I do so; 2) If I have concerns, open a GAR to see how serious those concerns are, resolving them myself if they are not serious; 3) If during the GAR I feel that there is significant work to be done (more than I can or am willing to do myself), I will put the GAR on hold and notify the main contributors.

My aim and intention is to keep the article listed - I would rather the article was improved and kept listed than the article is delisted. Where a delisting seems likely due to the amount or nature of work needed being greater than I am able to do alone, and the main contributors are unavailable or unable for whatever reason to do the work, then appropriate WikiProjects will be notified at least seven days before a delisting would take place. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article is good. There is an issue regarding the Weather box, if it meets WP:NOTSTAT and WP:EMBED, though that discussion is still ongoing. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 17:35, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gunner Robert Watmore

I'm unsure of the notability of this, but I've uploaded a picture of the memorial for Gunner Robert Watmore which is on West Cliff. Thought it could maybe me used in the history section with a sentence about it (can't see anything about WWII and Whitby at the mo). -LÒÓkingYourBest^(Talk|Edits) 19:38, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May be we need to note something on the war in the history section as it is thin on more recent history. Would probably be time to think about a History of Whitby article to expand on and give more details on the history of the town. Keith D (talk) 21:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. I was looking for History of Scarborough for a template, but guess History of York is a good (if somewhat large) place to start. -LÒÓkingYourBest^(Talk|Edits) 16:30, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Whitby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110929165612/http://www.yorkshire-forward.com/improving-places/rural-areas/market-towns/whitby/case-study-2 to http://www.yorkshire-forward.com/improving-places/rural-areas/market-towns/whitby/case-study-2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2016

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change the linked to resource from reference number 154 to link to ^[1]

This contains live data that backs up this fact.

The current reference link is linking to a dead page.

References

^ http://thingstodowhitby.com/

Parkbeans (talk) 15:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for pointing out the dead link. I have made the change as requested. Keith D (talk) 19:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://thingstodowhitby.com/

[1]