Talk:Asfandyar Bukhari

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

Use of Islamic honorifics and terms such as "martyr"

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles says that "Islamic honorifics should generally be omitted from articles (whether Arabic or English), except where they are part of quotations." The current version of the article uses uses Islamic honorifics - for examples: "Hazrat Ali (RA) and Imam Hussain (RA)."

Wikipedia also has a policy Neutral point of view. Referring to soldiers killed in action against the enemy as martyrs is not neutral point of view. Having said that, if sources used such language, then it is acceptable to use the word in a quotation.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]