Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nesreen Tafesh
- Nesreen Tafesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional biography. One primary reference, one RS. If kept, this would per WP:BLP need to be cut to a sentence. Very little in GNews. David Gerard (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 11:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 11:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, but needs a lot of work. Clearly a promotional article now, but with such a large number of TV appearances there must be a lot of Arabic sources. Some secondary sources can be seen in the Arabic article about her. Zerotalk 12:10, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- We can't keep a BLP on hypothetical sources, per WP:BLP we need the actual sources right there for the article to even exist - David Gerard (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: The article needs a lot of work and the cruft tossed, but we have to review Arabic language sources and need time to work them in. We have a presumption of notability, not a presumption of non-notability. At present, the article does not appear to contain anything libelous or even contentious, so there is no need to immediately delete anything other than the PR tone... WP:BLP requires sources, but per " contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion" does not mandate every single factoid be sourced and material be removed simply because it is not footnoted ... Montanabw(talk) 06:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Classic WP:PROMO; no secondary sources at all; tagged for sourcing since 2014. But I have run out of patience with sourcing articles on wannabe singers, artists, and actresses, even one who has "unique diversity in my genetics... (which leads her to) self-elevate and rise above bias... (and whose) "ultimate pertinence is to the humanity.” Sheesh. Flag me if anybody has the patience to search for actual sources and put them on the page. Otherwise, delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by E.M.Gregory (talk • contribs)