Jump to content

User talk:76.21.6.165

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 76.21.6.165 (talk) at 07:48, 17 September 2016 (→unblock: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (76.21.6.165) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! DexDor (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:The T Network/SamNet (Australia), you may be blocked from editing. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 02:38, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:The_T_Network/SamNet_(Australia). —Frosty ☃ 03:00, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Giuseppe Guarneri has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

December 2014

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of burn centers in the Kanto Region. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Guerrilla warfare because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Neopets

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Neopets, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Warriors of the Rainbow: Seediq Bale  with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Janineholmes80 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:40, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Difang and Igay Duana. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. BMK (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Difang and Igay Duana‎‎

Per WP:SEEALSO:

The links in the "See also" section might be only indirectly related to the topic of the article because one purpose of "See also" links is to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics (emphasis added)

BMK (talk) 16:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Difang and Igay Duana. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BMK (talk) 23:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, BMK (talk) 23:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please also review Wikipedia's policies on External Links, which can be found at WP:EL. In short, external links provide additional information to the reader which, for one reason or another, cannot be included in the article. Since you have commented, in an edit summary, that the external link in dispute is indeed about "cultural appropriation" - although of a different sort than that in the article Difang and Igay Duana - it provides the reader with a broader context for that subject, and is therefore valid under are policy. Your continued removal of it, without discussion, appears to be a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT, which is never a valid reason for a removal. If you have specific and real concerns about the article, please express them on [[Talk::Difang and Igay Duana]], and note that repeated reversion along with the failure to discuss the issue, is, in and of itself, a valid reason for an admin to block the offending editor. Thanks, BMK (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please take a look at WP:CONSENSUS. Decisions on Wikipedia are made by a consensus of the editors involved in a discussion. As of this moment, since only you and I have talked about the external link in question, and we disagree, there is no consensus as to what to do, so the article must stay in the status quo ante. BMK (talk) 07:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Paul August with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

76.21.6.165 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is not a school IP. [[Special:Contributions/76.21.6.165|76.21.6.165]] ([[User talk:76.21.6.165#top|talk]]) 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is not a school IP. [[Special:Contributions/76.21.6.165|76.21.6.165]] ([[User talk:76.21.6.165#top|talk]]) 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is not a school IP. [[Special:Contributions/76.21.6.165|76.21.6.165]] ([[User talk:76.21.6.165#top|talk]]) 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:76.21.6.165&oldid=739825911"