Jump to content

Talk:BOL Network

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Njdeda Rlase (talk | contribs) at 14:12, 17 September 2016 (→Recent Editing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPakistan Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Humarinews.com

This is simply a blog and fails WP:RS. Using it to discuss a living person may be a WP:BLP violation. Dougweller (talk) 13:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit request on 1 June 2015

62.17.37.187 (talk) 06:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 09:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BOL Network is sold out

Defunct BOL Network and BOL News has been taken over in August 2015 by ARY Digital Network CEO Salman Iqbal.--Jogi 007 (talk) 06:53, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit request: BOL Network deal with ARY falls through

Note that BOL Network sale to the ARY Group has been abandoned. [1] Stabani (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Editing

User:Njdeda Rlase your recent edits have relegated the scandal to a small space. Feel free to edit as much as you want, but be warned that I will be changing the article when you are done in order to give prime position to the scandal. TouristerMan (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Touristerman, My edits are not related to the axact scandal. They are about other topics of BOL. Please do not make disruptive edits to the article. If you want to add something to controversy you can edit the controversy section or Axact article ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njdeda Rlase (talk • contribs) 11:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is how other news networks have controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNN If you want to highlight prime position of Axact scandal, it can be done in axact page or in controversy section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njdeda Rlase (talk • contribs) 11:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Njdeda Rlase you are adding WP:UNDUE information which is not needed here. For example the lines that PEMRA granted it a license is not needed here as it brings no encyclopedic mention to the article. Same is the case with other edits made by you, most of them are sourced to BOL's own website, so we have a sourcing problem as well. Furthermore BOL was owned by Axact, it came under the same FIA raid as AXACT and it had the same guy in its drivers seat as Axact, therefore the connection to AXACT scandal is worthy of mention here. You should also note the fact that BOL is not a "real" channel as it did not broadcast anything, the only thing that makes BOL pass WP:GNG is the scandal attached to it, therefore we should mention the scandal prominently. We can take this editing to a dispute resolution venue if you so require. TouristerMan (talk) 12:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adding undue information. Have you seen other similar articles? All international articles of TV Channels have this information and wikipedia policies describe clearly that it is OK to use company websites to reference information about facts. Official location, licenses are facts. Who said licensing authority should not be mentioned in encyclopedia? It *should* be mentioned. Why do you think BOL is not a real channel. I read that it was licensed and test transmission was made. You are utterly wrong. I may not be from the origin country, but I do know what TV channels are.

You are wrong that I removed scandal. I highlighted the controversy section infact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Njdeda Rlase (talk • contribs) 14:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have confused Axact with BOL and you have removed my days of edits and others edits just like that. If you think this channel does not pass general guideline that you hyperlinked, you should nominate it for deletion. Let us see what wikipedia staff has to say on that !

Instead of destroying my edits you should make your own edits related to scandal or discuss as you say

  1. ^ https://twitter.com/BOLNETWORK/status/649251195375083520
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:BOL_Network&oldid=739860866"