Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual filing cabinet
- Virtual filing cabinet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advert for non-notable product. Has already had a prod declined, hence AfD. Tagishsimon (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, two of the three sources are press releases that say right on the page they're user-generated - David Gerard (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete yes, seems like one of many projects that did not last through the recession that came fairly quickly after it. It looks like the company now sells something called InfoFlow, but that also does not seem to meet notability thresholds. W Nowicki (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete concur with nom. History shows article created by SPA with no other edits in the past 8 years. Clearly COI/promotional intent. MB 17:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)