Jump to content

Talk:Netherlands fallacy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sherb1 (talk | contribs) at 20:49, 18 September 2016 (A few instances in this article, the author uses esoteric terms that would be more easily understood if given more context, and a definition.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnvironment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Netherlands?

I have a question. Why is it named after the Netherlands in particular? Why not the lingering pollution fallacy or something like that? -Skyler 23:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Came to ask the same question... --Haruth (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Context

1) Instead of adding a hyperlink to [1] give examples of what specific negative environmental impacts the Netherlands (and other rich nations) have made on bordering nations, which would give context to the reader. 2) When you refer to [2], give more context about how they can be damaging to the environment, or what they are. 3) Defining [3] would give the reader a better understanding of how the Netherlands pollution is affecting the world. Sherb1 (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ environmental impacts
  2. ^ ecological sink status
  3. ^ ecological footprint