Talk:Military production during World War II

Germany Start‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / German / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

"Potential contribution"

US values are included in Allied totals for all years in order to illustrate potential contribution & Lend-Lease

It seems odd to have the US contribution, over 50% of the allied total, for the period 1938 to March 1941 (when the Lend Lease program started) included only "to illustrate potential contribution", especially when other countries are treated differently. I'd really like to see what the curve of the graph would look like if it only included actual contribution. And why are the notes in text different from the notes in the chart image, when the total figures are identical? —Michael Z. 2007-08-12 16:01 Z

American Aircraft Carrier Production

I am confused as to how a number greater than 100 was extrapolated in terms of US aircraft carrier production.

Rubber

Could anyone add the vital production of rubber to the overview? There are several decent papers on it. I only know the Raj and Far East of the British Empire was the largest producer alongside the Netherlands. I feel it deserves to be listed.--Simen113 (talk) 12:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese fighter aircraft

Omits the Nakajima Ki.43 (Oscar), second most-produced fighter with 5,900+ built. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:2180:1A9:394A:CBF0:442F:777E (talk) 21:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Particularly, in the Pacific theatre, the British Empire had no successful strategic offensive operations of note until the entrance of the United States.

This line, end of the second paragraph of the Historical Context section is completely meaningless. Anyone would assume The Entrance of the United States means the US entry into WW2, but the US and the British Empire declared war on Japan at the same time. ie: there was no Pacific theatre until the entrance of the united states.