Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torben Søndergaard
Remove text only having sources written by Torben Søndergaard's himself from the Torben_Søndergaard article makes the article almost non-existent.
And more should go according to the Wiki-standard. The article is simply not written according to the Wikipedia standard as hardly any of the sources verifiable, have no translations of sources in other languages, or are accessible. They are self-published, biased and the whole article is based on a claim of a movement that's non-existent.
There are hardly multiple reliable sources. The main sources are some tabloid newspapers and then Torben Søndergaard's own books, own website, own YouTube channel, and own opinion pieces in a minor Christian Danish newspaper. There is no movement. It's simply grandiose words from an upcoming YouTuber and conference speaker. When the critical stuff is gone from the article, this Wiki article is at best advertisement for a minor Danish ministry edited it's followers, fx RobbertDam, and the HMX-something guy who made a tutorial to other followers how to edit this page. The reason this page is getting attention is because Torben Søndergaard posted a link to it on his Facebook-page asking for help to make it positive - which is just as bad as negative - and then angry followers shared it.
And the Last Reformation is not really a worldwide movement. Writing a book, buying a website, making a Facebook-page, uploading videos to Youtube while stating something a hundred times does not make something real. This idea of a worldwide movement is simply an unfounded claim by Torben Søndergaard who simply hopes for a worldwide movement. There's maybe a few thousand active supporters worldwide and they, of course, vigorously all claim to have a movement, but - let's stay objective here - in fact, it's simply a claim.
In reality Søndergaard
- has established three minor housechurches in Denmark with less than 100 members in total. None of them are existing today.
- has 10-15 seminars a year with between 100 to about 1.000 people attending
- no other established ministry anywhere else in the world than Denmark, where he for the most part seems to be unknown.
- only a few thousands more or less active supports worldwide at best
Is he controversial? Probably. Does this make him noteworthy enough for a Wikipedia page? No.
Just look at the very modest activity on his Facebook page. This can in no way be a worldwide movement or a wiki-noteworthy person.