User talk:KnowledgeOfSelf

*This talk page is archived every 30 50 topics, if it gets too long or stagnant, or whenever I feel like it. :)

*Also if you leave me a message I will reply on my talk page, if I leave you a message, you can reply at either talk page I'll keep watch on both.

I'M SORRY FOR HURTING THE FURRY THING I WILL STOP LOL :)

GIen's RfA: Thank you!

KnowledgeOfSelf for your Support! I I feel truly humbled & honored by your support in my RfA, which closed at 90 / 5 / 0. Thank you! If you need me for anything, just say the word. For now however, just like Mr Potter here: My mop & I shall thwart all evil :) IThank you once again my friend. GIen

PS: YES YOU'RE RIGHT HARRY POTTER USES A BROOM! (BUT GOOD MOPS ARE HARD TO FIND!!)

Mr. Self, well what can I say, well what can I say that we havent already babbled about on IRC! :) Thank you so so much, your support, especially, was appreciated. Look forward to working with you ;) - GIen 05:48, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome GIen, now you can empty AIV and I can sit back and relax! ;) KOS | talk 11:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Back into the fray...?

Hi, KOS! Been working some much smaller wikis as of late; this is just getting crazy with vandals. I'm adminning a few smaller projects like this one. Drop me an e-mail when you have a moment. Been doing a bit of anonymous RC patrolling...man, there are some real freaks and weirdos out there. Anyway, take care. You'll know who this is when you click the link. 74.62.6.84 01:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! Yes I wrote you an email, it appears it was lost, how have you been? Really great that you stopped by! KOS | talk 01:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doin' groovy, thanks. And, thanks for swinging by the other wiki. When I saw the thrusting and parrying you were doing to the vandals over on the blocked users page, I couldn't help but smile. This place really gets under your skin and stays there. Try sending another e-mail if possible. If you don't hear from me right away, leave word at the other site. As far as returning here, I've thought of it, played around doing the RC patrolling...but I'm not sure I want the stress. If I do, it'll be strictly quiet editing. Done lots of work on the other wikis that could be moved here. 74.62.6.84 02:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Good to see you back ;) pschemp | talk 08:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your userpage section "Some statistics"

Aww, thanks. :) Luna Santin 20:49, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, mate...

File:Resilient-silver.png		The Resilient Barnstar
		Looking thru the history of your user page reveals some real struggles. I know I'm at least six months late, but better late than never. :D —$PЯINGεrαgђ

Thanks :) KOS | talk 14:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding a user

Apparently, UJonk has been creating User:--- pages (see his contributions) and all I see on them is that they have been indefinitely blocked.

I'm just wondering if these are real users, and why it says UJonk has created all of them.

Can you please clear this issue up? I'm a bit confused here.

--Nishkid64 23:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He has not been creating the users, but just tagging usernames that have alrady been blocked with {{indefblock}}. KOS | talk 23:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. Thanks, that clears things up. -- Nishkid64 ^Talk 19:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pic

/me looks above

ooh shinies :D

I tinkered with that pic but I'll let the experts decide which tag it eventually needs. --Alf ^melmac 00:59, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lancsalot

You should know that lancs a lot is an agenda based editor. See County Watch.--84.9.195.55 20:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Old warnings

Hi - I deliberately blanked the warnings at User talk:218.214.70.16. They were all old and no longer relevant. I believe leaving old warnings dilutes the message and makes it harder for the anon to find the latest message. I would not delete warnings given in the last few days but warnings back to November 2005 just make it harder to dind the latest - the Nov 2005 may not refer tot he same computer user. I discussed this at Wikipedia talk:Removing warnings poll#Clean-up of IP talk pages and got the response Antique IP talk pages are speedy deletion candidates. Whenever I run into one with only old warnings when I'm about to warn someone, I delete it before adding a new warning. I understand that not everyone who does RC patrol has admin powers, but I don't see the problem with anyone blanking the page before adding new warnings (or even without adding new warnings). JYolkowski Regsards--Arktos ^talk 02:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes hello, I reverted because of this diff, which was done by the anon and not you. Vandals should not remove warnings from their talk pages, and this is what this one did. I'm fine with you blanking talk pages and what not, but I'd like to say I do not appreciate your use of the rollback feature to revert me. That is not what that tool is for. Cheers KOS | talk 02:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked username

Hello. I see that you block my username of the folowing reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "W1N570N5M17H".

It is also written there that my ip is 72.14.192.33

It must be a mistake. First of all I DO NOT USE this IP(and never used it before) My IP is 88.215.149.10(for the last 5 mounth). Secondly - you can check the contributions assumed to my username and ip and see that there are no spam or any actions kinda of that. Thank you Sasha l 12:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the autoblock. Should be able to edit now. KOS | talk 13:59, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Award

		You are enlisted
		I hear by place this award for your thankless vandal fighting and place you as a honorary member of the wikipedia vandal-fightng army. Betacommand

Thank you very much! KOS | talk 15:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whee! More awards! Pile them on! (I can't find one now that wouldn't be somewhat redundant with the ones you've already been given.) :| —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 14:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redundancy is not always a bad thing. :P KOS | talk 15:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, not always. :D —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 15:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any "your mother" term in usernames are blocked

Why do you think usernames with the term "your mother" (or similar) will be blocked on sight? Thanks. Big top 19:23, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because they have the potential to offend people. Do you think they shouldn't? KOS | talk 19:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If I may add: "Names that are recognised as slurs or insults", this statement comes straight off the Wikipedia:Username policy page. Now the expression Your mom is an insult towards ones mother. Besides the only name I've blocked recently that I can recall is this one which also uses the "@yahoo.com" which could also have been blocked with the {{UsernameBlockedEmail}} because of the potential attracting spammers. Hopes that will clear this up further for you. KOS | talk 19:46, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page again! Molerat 20:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocky

Yo KOS, block me for 10 days. Or I'll go on a vandalism spree. --Dangherous 19:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		A good ol' Kiwi Pav!
		I, Glen give you KnowledgeOfSelf this delicious traditional Kiwi Pavlova for the WORST jokes in thew world!!! - GIen 04:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey now I was laughing my ass off, you know you were too! :) KOS | talk 04:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Appreciate it; it's our only form of payment around here. Best, Antandrus (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About "How Do You Do"

Sorry for that, I arranged the artice now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.140.183.135 (talk • contribs)

No worry, enjoy editing. KOS | talk 03:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? are you reading?

I'm not vadalzing the FPC talk page. I created an archive!!!!!!!!!!! 66.36.148.132 04:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you created on after the fact. I reverted myself. You should use an edit summary to explain your actions. That will help avoid mistakes such as these. KOS | talk 04:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gemstone page

Don't worry about the deletion... I've significantly updated and expanded the article on Gemstone IV. 71.202.122.184 04:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Jordan Bowen[reply]

Good to know, happy editing! KOS | talk 04:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert of my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 12:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome. KOS | talk 18:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me too. DVD+ R/W 21:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you are wlecome, it was my pleasure. KOS | talk 22:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your assistance with the edits made by 65.182.28.194 on the Rainforest Alliance page... the IP address is registered in San Jose, Costa Rica (one of the three major Rainforest Alliance headquarters) - so these edits are a bit suspicious to me. I am still relatively new to Wikipedia - what is the procedure when dealing with such vandalism? We can't revert these edits forever... Thanks again for your help! Quebecois1983 18:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When a page is being vandalized the editor who is making the edits are usually warned with templates. See a list at Wikipedia:Template_messages/User_talk_namespace#Grid_of_warnings. If after a certain amount of edits the user does not stop they are usually blocked, for a period of time deemed appropriate by the blocking admin. See Wikipedia:Vandalism as well. Thanks for the message. Happy editing. KOS | talk 18:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp ^laudare 01:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete these templates

Could you delete these templates below created by me? Thanks. Big top 01:35, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of my pages to be deleted by an admin:

User:Bigtop/Template:Notice User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Company User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Non-latin User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Email User:Bigtop/Template:Notice/UsernameBlocked/Wikimedia

Done, but please use {{Db-author}}, next time. KOS | talk 02:30, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to BE back.

Too many nice folks here. Those other wikis are kinda lonely. Thanks for the warm welcome, SL. --Lucky 6.9 16:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi, I've noticed that there are ip user who created new signature. I mean I'm so curious about these two IP. User:68.39.174.238 and User:69.145.123.171. Are these IP user really IP? In my opinion, They're good ip users or These two IP are not controlled by Human. Is it true that those IP I've mentioned really IP user? Please, reply in my talk page. Cheers! Daniel's page ☎ 02:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are really editors who edit from their ip address. KOS | talk 02:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: break

Thanks for the message, KOS! Unfortunately, my professional life has become increasingly busy and I am not certain that I will be able to resume editing Wikipedia. I have enjoyed working with you and the other editors. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly sorry to hear that, you are one of the best wikipedians I've ever interacted with. I do hope you will be back with us soon! KOS | talk 04:49, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wokka, wokka, wokka!

Gots us a million chortles here, SL. Hey, this is where we, the intelligentsia of the internet gather because myspace is just too darn boring! Besides, my leet speak is rusty. :)) - Lucky 6.9 05:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]