Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Purplehed Records
I have just declined this draft for the fourth time. It's a record label founded in 2014 by two brothers, one of whoom also has a Draft article written by the same user. The user has virtually no history on Wikipedia other than repeatedly trying to get these articles up. Both read pretty promotionally and fail to make the case for inclusion, as you'd expect given that they are fresh out of school as it were. I think out of kindness to the user it's time to nuke this so he can move on. Guy (Help!) 23:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Guy, I appreciate that you took time to review my draft. Firstly I have added most of the reliable sources like Trending on twitter in India for more that 10 hours, features on magazines and articles and then submitted for another review to get feedbacks for further improvements, I don't understand why and how it it more unreliable source. I was not hoping that my next reviewer will assume lot of things without even thinking or researching other side of the coin. And this is like too much fresh out of school really? Kindly elaborate what things you think are made up by me? I would like to debate on that because I am sure I have given credible and reliable source for each and every information and if not I will happily remove that piece of information which you think is made up by me . Despite of that, I don't understand why you have nominated my draft for deletion? It is my 1 year of research and I have really worked hard for it. I have not broken any wikipedia rule. Discussed lot of queries on Teahouse to improve it. And this is just your point of view that both are read pretty promotional, I have reached here with lot of reviews and failures. And regarding other draft, You can read the comment on it which clearly says "Although you listed several sources and, with it, information, there's still questionability to where I can't accept and it may then be best to wait for his career to continue, and see if the notability becomes clearer (and then resubmit at that later time). SwisterTwister talk 06:58, 12 July 2016 (UTC) " Till now whatever other users have suggested me, I have followed but you are asking me to delete my 1 year work. Why ? Dont you think its unfair? Yes I have written another draft related to same subject because I have done enough research on it. I understand according to you if its not notable you can decline but why delete? If you find it promotional its your job to guide me to fix it. Don't you think, it should be my call whether I want to move on or not? Dear senior members who have interacted with me previously , kindly help me on this thread, This is very unfair what is happening now and I would like to know your thoughts on it. SwisterTwister, Primefac,Onel5969, Checkingfax,Northamerica1000 cullen328, Cordless larry. Looking forward for justice for atleast once Catrat999 (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2016 (UTC)