User talk:Sangeethaa Theivendran

Welcome!

Hello, Sangeethaa Theivendran, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Kallar (caste). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 09:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Kallar

Hi, I have reverted you at Kallar (caste) because it looks like you are inserting your own opinion with that of sources. Some of those sources are a bit dubious anyway (Athelstane Baines, for example). If you are not in fact doing that then please could you provide citations at least for each paragraph. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

I have edited the page regarding Kallar (caste) mainly based on the book by Louis Dumont, "Piramalai kallar, A south Indian sub caste". I also took excerpts from published theses under Department of Historical studies and tourism development. I wouldn't have tried to edit the page if certain details were not available; rather the details about the caste in the present wikipedia page are distorted and derogatory. So tried to bring the truth with proper references.Sangeethaa Theivendran (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not actually deal with "truth" but just with what is verifiable using reliable sources - see WP:VNT. I thought you hade just added a bunch of stuff that relies on ancient texts for verifiability and I'm afraid that those are never suitable. So, I reverted you again.

Wikipedia is also not censored. Aside from erring on the side of caution when it relates to living people, we say things as they appear in reliable sources, regardless of whether that might cause offence. Our role is not to judge but to reflect what reliable sources say, hence WP:NPOV.

That said, Louis Dumont was an academic and might have a place in the article. The problem is that I rather think his opinion has been rejected by more modern academics, which means we have to be careful about how much weight we give to his views. I'll see if I can find a copy of the book. Hope this helps. - Sitush (talk) 16:36, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

The editing i made to etymology was based on Louis Dumont's views and government gazette sources. I wonder why you have accepted Louis Dumont's reference in the present wikipedia page. You just reject the source if your personal opinion differs from the source I have cited.

The editing I made to Origin is completely based on current genographic research. I is a well established fact. It is against the brahminical ideology. I find that must be the reason for rejecting that claim. Thank you for dominating wikipedia with your personal views.

September 2016

Your addition to Kallar (caste) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 06:09, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 06:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

The last edit i made is using my own words. I viewed the youtube video . A journey of man. Based on the findings of Dr.Spencer Wells, I edited the "origin" of kallars. I gave only that youtube video as reference. How is that a copyright violation?.Sangeethaa Theivendran (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

You also copied over some content from the thesis that you were copying content from earlier. —SpacemanSpiff 08:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Being new to wikipedia, I wasn't aware of the rules. I read the important rules regarding editing the articles. All that I am trying is to improve this article based on some books, theses and research works. I need to know if I can cite a thesis as a reference,i.e, writing an original content based on my readings and citing the thesis as reference. Is that allowed in wikipedia? So that I can read many theses on this subject till the block is removed...Sangeethaa Theivendran (talk) 18:02, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Is a published thesis a proper reference for an article?...

Sangeethaa Theivendran (talk) 05:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)