User talk:Jcc

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Jcc}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

John Robert Mills

Hello, Jcc. You have new messages at Moonbouncer54's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please note that full permission has been granted to use the text on the page: http://cayley.co.uk/john-robert-mills/ The text below has been added to the web page "Copyright Permission for Wikipedia The text of this page is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). In particular, CCC Trading Ltd gives permission for the use of text contained on this page to be used by Moonbouncer54 on the Wikipedia page relating to John Robert Mills. For verification please contact the site owner of CCC Trading Ltd (T/a Cayley Chemicals), Philip Mills by email: cayley@btinternet.com" Therefore please remove the tag for deletion Thank you Moonbouncer54 (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonbouncer54: I'm sorry, but I can't see a tag for deletion on that article- but even if the website content is under CC-BY-SA you still need to attribute it on the talk page. Talk page messages should also go at the bottom of the page.jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcc. Could you advise on how "CC-BY-SA 3.0 for every, full stop" can be achieved please Moonbouncer54 (talk) 09:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I seem to have missed out a word- "CC-BY-SA 3.0 for every page". All you would need to change is the title on the website from "Copyright Permission for Wikipedia" to "Copyright", and add a note stating it overrides the footer. jcc (tea and biscuits) 10:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Has been done. and thanks for help. Do you consider that the copyright rules are now met and I could re-submit? Moonbouncer54 (talk) 10:27, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the other day...

... Didn't have time in the middle of my ^$(%*$ weekend to say so, but actually I first picked up on the whole reversions thing from your talkpage message to me. And I did mean it when I said thanks for stepping in, both trying to protect the information and giving me a clue what was going on. So thanks much.... almost tempted to drop a barnstar in thanks but thought a personal word might mean more. Best, LaughingVulcan ^{Grok Page!} 23:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help on MKU page

Hi JCC! A month back, you'd reviewed this page, and helped improve it to be on Wikipedia! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKU_(company) I'm trying to improve it further. But there's this one thing that i need your help with. I'm not able to put the site's address in the info-box. Every time i do this, there is a message that the site address has been put in the blacklist. Can you please look into this and help? Best regards, ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Dabby (talk • contribs) 12:44, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd either ask here or just leave it, having it linked in the infobox is hardly vital. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:10, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Vision Windows

Thanks for helping out me out a lot. I can honestly say that if it wasn't for your constructive criticism, that I wouldn't be as good at making articles. The page I created is now up for deletion (again), despite it passing inclusion. I honestly don't understand how that is possible because I worked hard to get the article up to par. But it would be greatly appreciated if I could have your word on this. Once again thanks for the help. :) SWAloha (talk) 04:31, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SWAloha: Thank you for the notification and sorry it took me so long to get round to replying; I've voted at the AfD. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your help. I notice most of your edits are on South Asian subjects which i find interesting as I'm reading some of these articles. Where are you from? SWAloha (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	I think you truly deserve this, Jcc. I mean you're the one who refined my article on MKU and made it worthwhile to be on Wikipedia. Though i have done a good number of edits on Wikipedia, I'm still a newbie. So, thank you very much for your support! And I'm gonna come back to you every time I find some difficulty with wikipedia:) Dr. Dabby (talk) 12:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice sir. I wouldn't upload any artworks of mine in my name sir. sorry.Rajasekharan Parameswaran (talk) 06:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Collazo JPG

Hi Jcc! I noticed that you have nominated the pic that I got from Mr. Collazo to be deleted and are advocating that I be blocked. This is very distressing to me since I believe that I had followed your advice during my subject research. That is currently the only pic that I have and I would like your advise and support to keep it since it is relevant to the bio work that I did for this article. I have followed up as well with recent information as you suggested to keep it fresh.

I have appreciated your help on this and still do. As you may recall I have been specializing in researching interesting figures that are in the public/private space and I am not a pro but do try to get real research, references, citations as you suggested. My health issues permitting, I try to make it better. Please advise and thank you.TimeMist (talk) 19:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that, it was written in exasperation. At the moment, you've uploaded the same image 4 times- every time it's been deleted, and you've been told to go through the correct processes for submitting someone else's image, but you insist on resubmitting it every time, to be deleted again. It would not surprise me if you got blocked on Commons. I asked you, back in January to go through the OTRS process, but it appears that you haven't. The good news is that the process is even easier now than in January- what you need to "write" in the email to OTRS is automatically generated for you if you click here- but you need to do this otherwise you will probably be on your "final warning" at Commons. Also, I read through the Carlos Collazo article and my thoughts are that it would not survive if another editor were to nominate it for deletion. Here's my thoughts:

The external links inside the article have to go as they are very spammy.
The sections need to be renamed- titles like "Technology Inventions and Innovation" are inappropriate.
Every one of the long lists needs to go- e.g. "cyber security, server and network systems optimization management, digital media distribution, networked and distributed data base systems..." and the list of all the companies, advisory boards etc.

I've got a quick version that I think would stand a better chance of avoiding being deleted here- I've stripped loads of the article and some bits will need rephrasing and adding back in (for example, I'm clueless about the phrase "the analytical correlation of innovation and inter-operable frameworks used in combination with cyber intelligence to guide strategic business and organizational decisions"), but let me know what you think, and sorry again about the brusqueness of my message at Commons- but get filing that online form ASAP! jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:33, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]