This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Before doing that, you should really consider what SchrutedIt08 has said. You'll really, really have to work to show that the page is necessary and that the information can't be included somewhere else. Look at the examples he provided. You'll have to provide information specific to only season 1, as was done in those articles (and season 2 and all subsequent seasons). This message isn't intended to tell you not to do it. In fact, I'd really like to see articles for this show as comprehensive as the ones for Lost and Fringe. I'm just letting you know ahead of time that it's going to be a lot of work and that something like this isn't going to cut it. Kevinbrogers (talk) 18:27, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with both SchrutedIt08 and Kevinbrogers. Seasonal articles have to be noteworthy and not just copy-paste jobs from the main and episode list articles. If you find c-o-m-p-r-e-h-e-n-s-i-v-e data to add to a season article, then I'm all for it. However, Whitney just isn't as notable as Lost, Fringe or Dexter. — WylieCoyote (talk) 01:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For some shows with only one season so far, I think season pages are absolutely needed. But for Whitney, I just don't think so. The main page covers everything i think.Caringtype1 (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]