Talk:Baiji
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 13, 2010. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
WP:CETA capitalisation discussion
![]() | The Baiji article is part of the Cetaceans WikiProject. A discussion on the capitalisation of common names of cetaceans is taking place and your input is appreciated. Please see the the project talk page for the full rationale and comments. |
Conservation status
If it is functionally extinct shouldn't it's status be EW or EX? 72.228.177.92 (talk) 12:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC) No, have a look at the species' IUCN [List page] to see why. It probably [extinct] though... 93.19.150.5 (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- The IUCN Red List lists it as Critically Endangered, but goes on to say that it is Possibly Extinct. Should the infobox then read PE instead of CR? FUNgus guy (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Who has the power to change these ratings?
EvAnn05 (talk) 02:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
References
A large majority of the links are defunct on this page. 129.31.240.226 (talk) 10:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 August 2015
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change critically endangered to extinct, as confirmed by scientist quite recently. 108.56.131.169 (talk) 18:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The IUCN Red List currently has this species listed as "critically endangered". Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Baiji. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/08/29/whitedolphin_ani.html?category=animals&guid=20070829130000&dcitc=w19-506-ak-0001
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
The Baiji Extinct or not why does wiki say critically endangered if they are functionally extinct as of 2006?
why does wiki say critically endangered if they are functionally EvAnn05 (talk) 02:12, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Baiji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121112107/http://www.iucn-csg.org:80/index.php/baiji/ to http://www.iucn-csg.org/index.php/baiji/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402113858/http://www.iucn-csg.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Brauliketal2005.pdf to http://www.iucn-csg.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Brauliketal2005.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070619235441/http://baiji.org/fileadmin/pdf/EmergencyBaijiImplementationMeetingreport.pdf to http://baiji.org/fileadmin/pdf/EmergencyBaijiImplementationMeetingreport.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617043837/http://www.baiji.org:80/initiatives/ecotourism-tian-e-zhou.html to http://www.baiji.org/initiatives/ecotourism-tian-e-zhou.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050905223209/http://baiji.org:80/ to http://baiji.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
A Problem About The Number of Baiji Dolphin
In the section of "Conservation",there's such a sentence: "In the 1950s, the population was estimated at 6,000 animals,"[1] So there's a question about it:How many baiji dolphin were in the Yangtze River at most? As far as I'm concerned,the number of Baiji should be around 1000 to 3000 in the 1950s at most.It's not possible that there were around 6000 Baiji in the Yangtze River.Also,it seems truly incredible that Baiji had declined rapidly from 6000 animals to only a few hundred during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. I'm really puzzled about it so I just asked this question in the community of the Yangtze Finless Porpoise on Baidu Tieba(In Simplified Chinese):A Question About The Baiji Dolphin I just translate some of the answers in English: One user said maybe it's possible that there were about 6000 animals in the Yangtze before the period of Spring and Autumn,and he thought maybe in the 1950s,the number of the Baiji was hard to reach 1000. Another user said he supports this opinion and he thought it was possible to reach 6000(That's about 3 animals per kilometer),including Dongting Lake and Poyang Lake. Also,I found there's a mistake: In the section of "Evolutionary history",it said "there were 5,000 baiji when they were described in the ancient dictionary Erya circa 3rd century BC." But in the section of "Consevation",it said "In the 1950s, the population was estimated at 6,000 animals." The number of Baiji had increased during 17 centuries?It's impossible,maybe. Hope to find more references to prove the number. Thank you.Alneth (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- ^ [http://www.china.org.cn/english/environment/36657.htm Rescue Plan Prepared for Yangtze River Dolphins},China Daily.,July 11,2002.