User talk:Cuppysfriend

Welcome

Hello Cuppysfriend and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Hi! Next time, instead of moving articles with mispelled titles by creating a new article and putting a redirect on the wrong-spelled page, just use the "Move this page" link in the column on the left side of the page. It keeps the edit history of the text, and automatically creates the necessary redirect. Keep up the good work! Cheers! jengod 00:24, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)

Yes, I was just about to say the same thing in regards to Errett Lobban Cord. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 22:10, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Image license

Hi Cuppysfriend,

I've added {{GFDL}} to

Please see Special:Upload, which says

By uploading a file to which you hold the copyright, you agree to licence it under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

The GFDL requires that you be credited anyway, which is the requirement you specified.

Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 03:42, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for adding Richard Dillingham and putting him on the list of Quakers. Logophile 09:49, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Did you know?

Did you know has been updated and a fact from the article Metallurgical Laboratory, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at the section's talk page.

Quezon and Jews

Amazing! I never knew that Quezon helped the Jews. Actually I've never seen any Jew in the Philippines. There used to be a synagouge though.--Jondel 00:29, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re:Francis B. Sayre

The article said he was a professor at Harvard Law School. So I put academic, since there is no stub classification for "professional diplomat". Do you have any suggestions, then? Otherwise, I will change it back to {{bio-stub}}. Jaxl | talk 00:41, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. I might have been a bit careless myself. I will change it back to {{bio-stub}} and maybe propose a new stub for diplomats (I've seen quite a few that need their own category, actually). Sorry about that. Jaxl | talk 00:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have another solution for the time being. What nationality was Sayre? If he was a natural-born American, I can sort him under {{US-bio-stub}} instead. Jaxl | talk 15:30, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the information. I'll list him under {{US-bio-stub}} then. Jaxl | talk 20:02, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Per Anger

Of the existing stub types, poltician comes closest, since we don't really have one for government functionary, and besides, generally one doesn't rise (at least in the US) to the rank of ambassador without playing some in the field of politics. As for the SfD discussion, that's over renaming the stub type from {Swedish-politician-stub} to {Sweden-politician-stub}. With 72 stub articles (71 if Per Anger wasn't counted) there's more than enough to justify keeping the type, but the name doesn't follow the usual rules which are to use the country's name and not its adjective in stub template names. Caerwine 21:39, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Kirkwood

Hi, Cuppysfriend! By all means, please make the necessary corrections :-). I am glad that you caught that. I've been through Bloomington, Indiana so many times (live in Louisville and work in Northern Indiana) that my brain just stopped on that obvious detail!!! I am going back through any redirects I made to Indiana University of Pennsylvania (there were only a couple out of 250 edits) to make sure I didn't mess those up either. Your assistance is truly appreciated. Best regards, >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist • E@} 20:20, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Elias Hicks

Thanks for adding the picture of Hicks. I like your user page very much, by the way. Logophile 07:06, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Freeman Field Mutiny

I really don't think that the sub type of B-25 in this case is pertainant to the article, so that is why I changed it. It is usually perferable to use internal links when possible. There is, however, info about the J model in the B-25 Mitchell#Variants and Design stages section. This section has the same external link that I removed. If you want, you could change the link to B-25J and it would link directly to that section --rogerd 00:18, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New FSA/OWI template

Yeah, I just tried to describe the collection in the same careful, complicated way the LOC was doing on its site. As far as I know, the FSA was an independent agency, and never had any connection to the FDA. I think the use of the "Migrant Mother" image for the template is an excellent choice, as it's certainly the most recognizable icon of the FSA effort and very much characterizes the collection.--Pharos 00:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tysto

Thanks! --Tysto 07:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Look (policy)

Thanks for ~~expand~~... writing the New Look (policy) article. -HiFiGuy 05:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alamo bolide impact

Good job with Kentland.. Sorry about the edit conflict. Please vet my amateur effort at the Alamo bolide impact. --Wetman 23:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kentland

Damn, I knew about the Kentland Crater and didn't mention it? ThanksM dorothy

your message

hi Cuppysfriend, thank you for your message. I have send you an email back, hope it works out. with kind regards Gryffindor 00:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shadrach Minkins

I see you added [1] the name Shadrach Minkins to those buried in the Mount Royal Cemetery in Montreal, Quebec. His biography would be of interest based on your description. However, the cemetery has no record [2] of him. Could you please provide the source of your information. Thank you. Marco Thomas

Thanks for the information. Do you have any other biographical stuff that might be used to make an article? Marco Thomas

What you did already is excellent but please do your intended full article as this is a worthwhile and interesting story. Good work and many thanks. Marco Thomas

Image:Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg

To meet wikipedias fair use criteria the photo needs to be doing more than than just showing what he looks like in ar article that isn't about him. It is fine in his article, but not really OK in the Interim Committee article. Have you looked for an image showing all of them together, the image on this page appears to show most of them, and looks better than the individual photos.--Peta 23:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the Paul McNutt article, there is a free alternative, fair use images shouldn't be used to illustrate the appearance of an individual when there is a free image. You should read WP:FU and WP:FUC if you need more information on where and when to use fair use images.--Peta 23:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

5th Indiana Volunteers (?)

This is the only reference to the unit that i know of: Mahlon Dickerson Manson. --evrik 04:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chamberlin Observatory

That looks great, thanks!! I don't suppose you would mind working your magic on Western State College of Colorado. I seem to have had a infobox/image conflict there as well. The picture that I thought of adding is Image:Western State College Gunnison, CO.jpg. Thanks a bunch!--DO11.10 05:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mussels and P

I'm no expert in phosphorus yet, and I would never be when it comes to invertebrates, but I am just a few clicks away from hundreds of people who are, so here's what they have to say.

I guess you're thinking of zebra mussels, but what I can offer is probably still relevant if you're not. A partial skim of a scientific database come up with almost 100 hits on "phosphorus and mussels," mostly on zebra mussels in NAmerica. I saw no suggestion that more P meant fewer mussels. On the contrary, I did see more P associated with more mussels (causal pathways goes both ways, it seems). I also saw that when zebra mussels invaded various NAmerican lakes they sometimes (though not always) reduced the total amount of algae (so greater water clarity), and also may have changed the balance of the species of algae favouring a more noxious one. It appears the way mussels alter the trophic status of lakes (how "healthy" the lakes are) varies among lakes. This all seems like a relatively popular area of research, probably because of the spread of zebra mussels on top of eutrophic lakes through NAmerica.

Does this help? Daniel Collins 03:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Auburn Indiana Logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Auburn Indiana Logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nicolette Larson Very Best 1999.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicolette Larson Very Best 1999.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ross_Lockridge_Jr_1947.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ross_Lockridge_Jr_1947.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fluvial landforms of streams

I see you have a history of working on the article Fluvial landforms of streams. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. Jeepday (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One reference is a great start and meets the goal I was striving for on this article. I did put a {{onesource}} so that hopefully someone will come along later and do more. But you have met the goal of Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles. Thank you :) Jeepday (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nancy Andrew

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Nancy Andrew, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? KenWalker | Talk 05:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message and your earlier one on this. Sorry I didn't get back to you. I thought I would leave it for you to decide about removing the prod tag. I see that you have done that now. I don't intend to AfD the article. Your comments suggest there is some notablity beyond what I had thought, I am content with that. Cheers. --KenWalker | Talk 23:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bancroft treaties still in force?

Hi. In the Bancroft Treaties article, the current text says that "The treaties with Albania, Bulgaria and Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) remain in force" — citing 7 FAM 1277(b) as a source.

I can't find 7 FAM 1277(b) anywhere online. If it was once on the State Department's web site, it doesn't appear to be there now; the existing link in the article is dead, and a search on www.state.gov turned up nothing. Also, a Google search came back empty except for this Wikipedia article and some other page which had copied the Wikipedia article.

It had been my understanding that the Bancroft treaty with Czechoslovakia was unilaterally terminated (with notice) in the 1990's by the US after the Czech government refused to agree to a mutual recission. If 7 FAM 1277(b) said that this (and the other two) treaties were still in force, I would be interested in knowing the revision date of this section, in order to confirm that it's still current (or not).

If you have some other, currently verifiable source for the statement that the above three Bancroft treaties are still in force, would it be possible for you to go back to the article and edit it accordingly? Thanks. Richwales (talk) 05:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very surprised to read that the nationality treaty with Bulgaria was still in force — and if you hadn't provided that State Dept. source, I would have insisted that this couldn't possibly be so. I would very much like to find more info as to why the Bulgarian treaty hasn't been unilaterally abrogated by the US in the same way as the Czechosolvak treaty was. The same set of legal arguments should presumably apply to the Bulgarian treaty, as far as I can imagine. Richwales (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Time Cover William L Clayton.jpg IFD closed

I non-administratively closed Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_November_16#Image:Time_Cover_William_L_Clayton.jpg because the image is no longer in use. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:22, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock of shared IP address

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1268897 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Step hen 01:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:George L Harrison.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:George L Harrison.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soldier's medal recipients

As mentioned on the talk page, the content isn't deleted per se - rather, it's been converted into a category, which is substantially more manageable. This is the way we deal with the other awards & decorations, generally speaking, and I'm not sure if there's any particular reason this needs to be different. Shimgray | talk | 15:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're more than welcome to undo the redirect and formally propose a merge, or indeed just merge it outright, but I'm very doubtful that we'd actually gain anything by that - we'd end up with a badly-sourced list cluttering up the main article, which would be duplicated almost entirely by the category here.

As to future mergers, no, nothing we do just now is going to cause problems with that. Shimgray | talk | 16:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

		The Indiana Barnstar
		For the wealth of information you have contributed to a broad range of Indiana related topics, I present you with this barnstar. You hard work makes Wikipedia a better place. Keep it up! —Charles Edward ^{(Talk \| Contribs)} 12:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am deeply touched. Thank you! --Cuppysfriend (talk) 22:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Emperor Jones Poster 1937.jpg

File:Emperor Jones Poster 1937.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Emperor Jones Poster 1937.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Emperor Jones Poster 1937.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animas Valley CO 1903.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Animas Valley CO 1903.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 05:07, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Entrenched river.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Entrenched river.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:08, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Laramie River 1905.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Little Laramie River 1905.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lexington Motor Company 1920.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Lexington Motor Company 1920.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cuppysfriend will be offline for a little while

I was hit by a car on October 13, 2009, and am recuperating from surgery. Some rehab ahead. Posting this from the hospital using borrowed laptop. Cheers, -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Auburn Cord Duesenberg

You may not agree with calling it an historic district, but the National Park Service classifies the ACD site as an historic district. See http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=-1105737270&ResourceType=District

Accordingly, the infobox in Auburn Cord Duesenberg Automobile Museum labels it "historic district" and it is in Wikipedia historic district categories. All I did was add it to the state category (previously it was in the US historic district category). --Orlady (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Logan

Your presence is requested over at Talk:Logansport, Indiana and Talk:Captain Logan regarding your correct edits to Logansport, Indiana at 5:57pm on 13 March 2006. I am chipping away at factual errors in the Captain Logan article. —optikos (talk) 21:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Little brown bat

It's hard to know why silly people end up in such odd places. Perhaps they search for terms that amuse them then follow a link from that. They could start at Dyke Marsh or Hellhole while searching for things of prurient interest and when they end up at a bat article, the edit button is just too tempting. Peripitus (Talk) 23:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will Cuppy's Sign

The signature picked from the WWI draft were too confused, Have cleaned them. Hope you won't mind. Jon Ascton (talk) 22:31, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Colin Winter book cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Colin Winter book cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About use of "PD-because" template

Your best to contact the experts at WP:MCQ with your question. Thanks! --Admrboltz (talk) 02:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:James B Conant 1941.gif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:James B Conant 1941.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 01:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 15:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interim Committee

Would it be alright if I nominated Interim Committee as a good article? Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be delighted! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoice~ It has passed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yippee! Most of the credit is yours. I knew that there was more to be said about the committee's work, and I always kept in mind the possibility of expanding the article to describe it. But the recommendation on the military use of the weapon and Ralph Bard's later dissent were my main concerns. Congratulations! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Museum backstage pass

The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. ---LoriLee (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bengt Stromgren 1957.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bengt Stromgren 1957.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:15, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amalrik.jpg

I have just rescued File:Amalrik.jpg, which you uploaded, from probable deletion on Christmas Day. Somehow it was removed from the article Andrei Amalrik and tagged with an "orphaned image" template. I had just uploaded a file with Amalrik's signature to the Commons for use in the article, so I caught the potential deletion before it took place. Both the image and the signature file are now displayed in an infobox, and I have deleted the "orphan" template from the image file page. Since you're an administrator, you can judge whether I've acted correctly. By the way, I actually met Amalrik in 1977 in Bloomington, Indiana. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! The problem is that the file is claimed under "fair use" and the fair use rationale that I wrote is not very convincing. It was OK a few years ago but Wikipedia seems to significantly raise the requirements for fair use since then. I do believe that the fair use claim is valid but it will be difficult to argue if somebody would put it to deletion. Do you by any chance have an Amalrik photo with your copyright that you can release as GFDL or Creative Commons? Or may be you know an Amalrik photo with a story behind it so the fair use claim will be of better merit? Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Glad to have been of help, but no, I don't have a free-use photo of Amalrik, but I've been looking for one. More things are being digitalized all the time, so maybe something will turn up. Cheers! -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gray fossil site

I saw you were the main creator of the Gray Fossil site page. FYI: I was able to get a few free image of turtle shell fossils. The Museum itself was very unhelpful, would not even let me come down and take my own photos (usually allowing others to do so is reasonable). however I got an image from another researcher and confirmed he was the actual taker of the photo and all.TCO (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Couple others of shells being held up.

TCO (talk) 07:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Union Now postwar edition.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Union Now postwar edition.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution!Template:Z135 --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Freeman Field Mutiny.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Freeman Field Mutiny.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cuppysfriend. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 05:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:24, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dashes

I suggest you read up on Dash and MOS:DASH. Your RMs don't make sense. Dicklyon (talk) 08:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

La Vang

I think they ought to remain separate. One is a secular geographic appellation. The other a name for a Marian apparition. You will note that both Fátima, Portugal and Lourdes, France have separate articles for the places and the appartions, even though like La Vang, the apparition is probably the most notable thing about the place. I think, as the articles grow, we will find they will differentiate. Matters which belong in the place article will not belong in the apparition article and more minute details of the appartition will not belong in the place article. Cheers. And thanks for the message. Mamalujo (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joint Declaration by Members of the United Nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hutchinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The reference was to Hutchinson (publisher). I have corrected the link. --Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ralph Carr (entertainment) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph Carr (entertainment) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Carr (entertainment) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

28th Regiment Indiana Infantry (Colored) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 28th Regiment Indiana Infantry (Colored). Since you had some involvement with the 28th Regiment Indiana Infantry (Colored) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Adamdaley (talk) 05:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pipe Creek Sinkhole.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pipe Creek Sinkhole.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pipe Creek Turtle.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pipe Creek Turtle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marjorie Hillis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Cuppysfriend (talk) 23:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Governor Ralph Carr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Governor Ralph Carr.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 13:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cazenovia, New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Ezra Greenleaf Weld (American - Fugitive Slave Law Convention, Cazenovia, New York - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cazenovia (village), New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Ezra Greenleaf Weld (American - Fugitive Slave Law Convention, Cazenovia, New York - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Lt Roger C Terry.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lt Roger C Terry.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 15:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Nancy Andrew Translator 1970.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nancy Andrew Translator 1970.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ross Lockridge Jr 1947.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ross Lockridge Jr 1947.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cuppysfriend. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]