Jump to content

User talk:Erika39

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 23:07, 21 November 2016 (ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Erika39, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DocteurCosmos (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hi Erika39. When you're adding an interwiki link, like this, would it be possible for you to use an edit summary of "+interwiki" or "+iw" or something like that? Many people will be confused by an edit summary of "+Bot." for this kind of change. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK Erika39 (talk) 08:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial move discussion for A. J. Foyt

I dispute your move of A. J. Foyt to Anthony Joseph Foyt. This is not his Common name. I have listed the move discussion on Talk:Anthony Joseph Foyt. Royalbroil 12:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see, it's my fault, sorry! Greetings.-- Erika39 (talk) 09:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for being so understanding. I wasn't assigning blame on you, just informing you so that you had the opportunity to explain your position. You can ask me any questions you have about Wikipedia at any time. I know there's a lot to understand, and I've seen a lot. Royalbroil 13:10, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move this article to the incorrect name? His name is Max Jean, not Jean Max. It even explains it in the article. Can you move it back please? Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No matter, I've already done it. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Name of this Driver ist Jean Max not Max Jean!! -- Erika39 (talk) 22:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It really isn't. Please go to any reputable motor sport website and look it up, like this one [1] Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Look at this [2]. Greetings. -- Erika39 (talk) 22:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That is not a reliable source - it hardly beats GP.com and Autosport, does it? This is a well-known mistake arising from an error on an entry list. Check out the full story here [3]. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, Thanks for the Link! -- Erika39 (talk) 07:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Keep up the good work :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Track Map Le Mans - German Lemma of the 24 Hour Race

Hi Will, you change the Track Map of de Circuit de Sarthe on the German Lemma. Sorry, we discussed it and changed it back to the older one. Greetings. -- Erika39 (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was something wrong with the image? I may be able to fix it. Will (Talk - contribs) 19:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:24 Hours of Le Mans race cars

Category:24 Hours of Le Mans race cars, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Erika39. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]