User talk:RHaworth/2016 Dec 18

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

Shillary

Re your November 10 deletion of Talk:Shillary could you please give me access to the text I left there? I had a request that if you were not going to discuss it there that it be moved to either RFD or to Talk:Hillary Clinton. I did that out of the courtesy of not cluttering your talk page, but the courtesy of keeping the message intact was not reciprocated, so that is the step I take now.

This was regarding your October 23 deletion of the term as "implausible" which I contradicted with new sources. I put work into cite webbing them and would like to avoid having to repeat that. — Ranze (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

• Restored to Talk:Hillary Clinton. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you :) Ranze (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RHaworth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Todd and Clare

Hi Roger -- back in October you deleted a page for a dating website called Todd and Clare. The same guy, using the same playbook, has stood up an article for another company called Yamie Chess. It was nominated for deletion today. I am wondering if it passes the smell test from your perspective? Regards, pm. 99.242.25.5 (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Retracted. I want to avoid any appearance of WP:CANVAS. Previously I was unaware that was a thing. Sorry to trouble you. ~pm 99.242.25.5 (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Abstraction Games

Dear Sir, I wish to inquire why you've deleted my entry of Abstraction Games. It is an existing company and even has links to it from other pages like from this one: Potpourrii . I request that you reconsider this decision. Thanks in advance, Blazy008 -- Blazy008 (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• You probably have a COI and I should just intone my "kindly" mantra at you. The article deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstraction Games was 16k bytes long and replete with references. Yours was 4k bytes long and lacked references - so what chance had it of survival? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Puntoticket article deleted

Hi Roger, my name is Al. You recently deleted the article about Puntoticket. I was trying to update it, with more information, links, articles, etc to prove that . I understand that the company may not be perceived as important outside of Latin America, but is gaining visibility at international level and is selling tickets for all the big events in Chile. I'm ready to provide more notability confirmations and to change the language, if you perceive it as promotional. Can you please explain me how can I improve more the content, so the article be approved? Thank you in advance for your helm - Aldoaller (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

User SOCK suspected, but no SPI Case?

Hey RHaworth! I noticed you tagged B.Bhargava Teja as potentially being a Sockpuppet of Bhargava Krishna , but there was no block and no case took to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhargava Krishna. I dunno, were you leaving it there for someone else to take a look at? Also, I'm pondering putting a PROD on Sampoorna Premayanam (B.Bhargava is the article's primary editor from what I see) but wonder if it falls under A7 or (quite possibly, judging by the grammar) G11. Any suggestions? MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) ^{(Now THIS... I did.)} 00:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

There may in fact be enough to tie both of them together, considering the newer account started in 2015 immediately with the same subjects, and the similar name at that too. As for your last sentence, that film is in fact acceptable it seems, and is certainly not A7 or G11. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

It is @SwisterTwister: ? Oh okay. The sources just didnt seem to be from verified sources and a Google search didn't seem to bring anything too promising. Then again I never finished Sources at Adoption School. *shrug*. Thanks for putting me right. Good luck if you're opening an SPI. MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) ^{(Now THIS... I did.)} 07:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

• My feeling was to allow B.Bhargava Teja to continue to operate since they seem to have abandoned the sins of Bhargava Krishna and also their own sin of uploading movie posters and claiming them to be publick domain. But I will leave others to act as they see fit. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Are articles in this wikilink worth keeping?

Hi RHaworth, I have joined Wikipedia recently and wanted to understand from you whether the articles in the Student organisations section of this page link below should be deleted under A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). Student organisations in IIT Kharagpur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyoko x (talk • contribs) 05:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

• You need to learn how to create a wikilink to a section. I suspect your real question is: "why was KRSSG deleted when two other articles linked to from that section are perfectly firm?" The best advice I can give you is to search this page for where I have used the word "kindly". But you could also follow the advice at the top of the section to which you link and ask at talk:Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur whether your group is notable enough. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Emotional Speech Blocks Syndrome Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

UTC-05:32:11 article

Why was my article on UTC-05:32:11 deleted for being a "hoax" It is not a hoax. Go to this webpage and select 1800-1849. There are other previously unknown time zones used in the 19th century according to that website, and I intended to make articles for them all. I don't see why we can't have articles for those time zones. Is it because they subtract seconds? We have an article for UTC-00:25:21 — NASAPeepo (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

• When you write about an article, create a link to it. One argument is that Dublin Mean Time applied to the whole of Ireland while UTC-05:32:11 applied just to Detroit. I have restored it but I recommend strongly that before you create any more similar articles, raise the matter on a suitable talk page and get agreement. Personally I would like to see most of these [[UTC±…]] titles converted to redirects. "UTC-05:32:11" or "UTC-00:25:21" are utterly implausible search terms. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

I will definitely be creating articles for UTC-15:56 and UTC+14:00:24, formerly used in Manila and Anchorage, respectively. Since those subtracted and added the most to UTC as far as I know. Also, I only know for sure it was used in Detroit. As that is the only city in the whole Midwest that has time zone info before 1970 on that website. — NASAPeepo (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth, you should delete all these alleged time zone articles that were merely local solar mean times before time zones were established in the 1880s, including the Manila, Anchorage, and any local cities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HkCaGu (talk • contribs)

• HkCaGu has a point: time zones which disappeared with the arrival of railway time and the electrick telegraph are of no interest. I would also classify user:NASAPeepo's stubs as slovenly. UTC-05:32:11 - was it just Detroit - why did it survive as late as 1905? Find out. UTC+14:00:24 - you should point out that it seems more sensible when expressed as Moscow time+11. UTC-15:56 - no attempt made to explain why the change happened. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Hotel California

Can you semi-protect the page to persistent genre warring. — 115.164.219.28 (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

• What is "genre warring" and read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) "Genre warring" is the musical equivalent of nationalism in infoboxes eg: changing "rock" to "soft rock" to "classic rock" and then back again. Some day, I may write a general summary in WP:LAME. In the meantime, article semi-protected for 24 hours; in future, WP:RFPP is thataway. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:28, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Unsalt request

Hi there, a year ago you salted Luke Ryan. A person by that name has just been drafted in the 2016 AFL draft. Whilst most newly drafted players aren't notable enough for an article, I like to redirect the new players to a list like List of Fremantle Football Club players#Listed players yet to play an AFL game for Fremantle. So, can you please unsalt? Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

• Create a new article at draft:Luke Ryan. If it gets accepted then unsalting will be uncontroversial. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Poly.pov

Hello, This was a POV-Ray source file used to generate several standardized polyhedron images for Wikipedia. It should not have been deleted. Can it be restored or at the very least moved to some appropriate location? — LucasVB | Talk 15:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

• This thread suggests that .pov is a file type banned on Commons. If you think such files should be allowed, raise the matter in an appropriate forum on Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Request to restore UkrGasVydobuvannya

Hi there, I saw you deleted an article I have created. It was not advertising, it was an informational page about the company - a state owned gas producer in Ukraine. Could you explain which information looked like advertisement to you? Could you please restore it / suggest edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozhik304 (talk • contribs)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Could you show any piece of information that was of conflict of interest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozhik304 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Seriously, ANY not neutral content? Wikipedia is based on 5 pillars and deletion of this article rejects two of them.

Pillar 2: "Second pillar Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view" - Neither of the provided information had any bias of any sort. Please refer to the Ukrainian version of the page for further details on the company. The English version was only a translation (you can check using google translate).

Pillar 3: "Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute". If information is of neutral content - why do you limit my rights to create content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yozhik304 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) UkrGasVydobuvannya looks like the Ukrainian equivalent of British Gas, so the odds of Yozhik304 owning a national organisation are fairly slim. (Of course, one could claim that, say, a British Gas engineer shouldn't be editing articles about British Gas or that postmen shouldn't be editing Royal Mail, but I'm pretty sure if I asked the last bloke who read my meter what WP:COI was, he'd probably give me a blank stare and ask me what I was banging on about) I think we should restore the article and send it to AfD to see what consensus thinks. What say everyone else? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• Yozhik304, the COI accusation is, I admit, a gross assumption. When you have a good contributions history on a variety of topics, come back and I will withdraw the accusation. Feel free to raise the matter at DRV.

Ritchie333, yes, I do say that an employee (or in this case, quite likely an intern) writing about a company is COI. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

→§§ This Is A Streetway §§←

I Think Template:→§§ This Is A Streetway §§← Was Deleted By You! Please Don't Block Me! Thank You! JordanBaumann1211 (talk) 20:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

• Where is written that you must Begin Every Word of A Sentence With A Capital Letter? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

SORRY, Just new to Wikipedia

Concerning the page you deleted: Afolabi Osho. I created the page out of misconception about wikipedia uses. I have no regret of you deleting the page. It indeed a good thing to keep out irrelevant message. I will also go through many Wikipedia's Terms and Conditions because I still have many article and edits worthy enough to help humankind. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afolabi Osho (talk • contribs) 00:49, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for Consortiumnews

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Consortiumnews. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. RekishiEJ (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Fundamental physical constant (disambiguation)

Did you read my rationale for keeping this page at Talk:Fundamental physical constant (disambiguation) before you deleted it? If you did, what was your rationale for ignoring it? Of course, I could have just declined the speedy deletion myself and then carried out the proposed actions, but I did not feel it proper to take an administrative action, and an editor action at the same time over the same issue. SpinningSpark 14:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• Deletion was a technical matter in that the page was an orphaned disambiguation page. But with my limited knowledge of physics, I don't see why the term fundamental physical constant should be restricted to dimensionless ones. So why not be bold and turn fundamental physical constant into a dab page? Failing that raise your concern at talk:dimensionless physical constant with a link to the discussion from talk:physical constant. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that was my intention, except that I was going to move the history since this really was a disambiguation before it was redirected. That's why I didn't want it speedied. Since you consider this to be a purely technical matter, I am going to assume that will not object to me undeleting the history. SpinningSpark 13:36, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

• Undeleting which history? Talk pages without articles are not allowed. But go ahead - I will not interfere. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your speedy deletions of Cathead. I came across the pages while reviewing some categories. Interestingly, cathead itself is a real topic. – S. Rich (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Superior Challenge English

Hi, I just noticed that you have deleted Superior Challenge's page in English. Can you tell me why? — Babak.aghavali (talk) 20:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• Superior Challenge was not deleted by me but this AfD discussion seems pretty conclusive. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

you deleted Jarrett Arnold

Hey, my brother set up a wiki article for me and I was going to add information to it this evening, thought it would be fun, but it seems you deleted it. I think I have to ask you to reinstate it so that I can edit it. It was called Jarrett Arnold, which is my name. Thanks for this, Jarrett — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jarrettarnold (talk • contribs) 00:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

• I am amazed that you even ask me. Do you know the difference between an encyclopedia and a social networking site? Go away to FaceBook. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:46, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of "Oilfield Scale Inhibition" article

You just deleted a new article "Oilfield Scale Inhibition" without giving any specific reasons. Could you please provide me with reasons for the deletion? Is it because I did not move it to 'article space' before submitting for review? I am a new user and eager to learn from my mistakes and make the article better; I would appreciate your feedback.Thank you.

A sample of the article was moved to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Oilfield_Scale_Inhibition