Talk:Project portfolio management

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2013; 2014; 2016;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Systems: Project management Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Project management.

Written as an Advertisement?

In May of 2013 a notice was put up that this article appears to be written like an advertisement. I actually disagree with that. I read through a lot and gained some good insight for a project I'm working on. Should that notice be removed or do others disagree with me? Jasenlee (talk) 15:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll agree and take it down. The notice was posted 20:13, 13 May 2013‎ by user 66.6.146.58

There is no talk or detail to work with, the description at history only says "(holy crap)"
No such concern apparent to Jasenlee and I and nobody else voiced one
Significant time and deletions have occurred - e.g. sections The PPM market and Capability Definition, and references to PMI PMBOK and Gartner. (I think it was better before but ... point here is that eliminated area where such a concern might have been.)

Deleting next Markbassett (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the wording was nicked verbatim from "The Wiley Guide to Project, Program, and Portfolio Management" (see here ).

Lacking in references to reliable sources

OK, so it's not advertising... but it isn't a good page yet. The page is lacking in references to actual sources. Many pages on Wikipedia that look like this have been deleted for being non notable. Let's not let a valid page die because we are too lazy to cite sources. Nickmalik (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]