Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Greenman

Ben Greenman

• Ben Greenman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Ben Greenman bibliography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

– (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:PROMOTION. Only three refs included in the main article, and all they tell us is that the subject received favorable reviews of his books. Ilovetopaint (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

• Reviews in independent reliable sources are the usual way to determine notability of an author. Why should it be different in this case? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

• It's different here because the article gives many other details besides "so-and-so praised the book". There's also WP:NPOV in cherrypicking only positive reviews. Surely not all of his books received unanimous acclaim?--Ilovetopaint (talk) 06:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)