Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Dreman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by K.e.coffman (talk | contribs) at 03:41, 14 December 2016 (Diana Dreman: D). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Diana Dreman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Diana Dreman was Miss Colorado, but she gets very little notice for that. Just very local coverage, not enough to justify an article. Some of the coverage she gets is more novelty coverage because she is the first person whose mother was Miss America to win a state Miss America title. This is not enough to justify a free standing article on her. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet WP:GNG.--CaroleHenson (talk) 06:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This discussion was originally closed as no consensus because there is a lack of Wikipedia consensus on the matter on December 6th, after I presented some issues to the closer, and another editor argued that these should be considered on a case by case basis, the administrator who closed gave permission to reopen this discussion. I primarily state this so the time frame when this discussion has actually been open can be clearly seen. It was closed from early December 6th (about 7 GMT) to about 14 GMT on December 9th.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:30, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been relisted in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions now that it has been reopened.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]