User talk:Lucky 6.9

I am considering a return to semi-active editing, with or without my voluntarily withdrawn adminship. Been floating around as an anon for awhile; might as well be up front about it.

FYI, I've been busy on other wiki projects and I'll likely spend most of my time moving some new articles over here.

I'm truly glad to read that! KOS | talk 16:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky, if you're back, I'm glad to see that something good is going on around here. Welcome! Antandrus (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Applause! Applause, applause, applause! Welcome back, thou grotesque sack of rhinoceros vomit. DS 17:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarbucksVentiMintMochaChipFrappuccino.jpg

A sweet and frosty (but warmly intended) toast to your return! :-) FreplySpang 17:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay! Your name comes up a lot here. I always wanted to meet you. ;) 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 01:59 (UTC)

I've been busy and just seen this. Good to see you back. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man welcome back! --Stormie 05:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, yeah, had a read of you user page, I had no idea that such wikis even existed. An Austin Powers wiki!? :-) --Stormie 06:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must be late to the party, but welcome to Wikipedia once again. Glad to see you return. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:15, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Always good to see established editors give Wikipedia another go. —this is messedrocker (talk) 05:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Please

I respectfully ask you to stop deleting Ze Ramalho's article. You deleted it completely without notice while I was creating the article and then put the reason as not enough information. Three times I started the article and three times you deleted it as I was writing. If notability is in question just check IMdb for now and that should resolve the issue since the artist has gone Platinum and Gold on several records and has been signed by Sony and BMG for most of his career. If additional information is the issue then I need you to stop deleting the article so that I can work on it. Thanks! Meanax 14:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Public Access

Why are you erasing the history of public access entry I did? Should I call it History of Public Access instead? George C. Stoney the father of public access agrees with the history. I thought it was too big to put into the public access entry. Could you please explain yourself in the future? In all due respect I'm new at this and learning, and you were brief to erase what I did. I'm the grass roots founder of public access in my hometown of Evansville, IN and have made numerours additions to the public access entry, which have been acknowledged by public access managers across the country. Please don't erase what I've done, but please let me know how I can do it right if it's wrong. Thank you. DavidWJohnson 03:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jiggy128

I've reported him to AIV, already. He does need to be stopped. Ryūlóng 05:10, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your return

To celebrate your return Tom and Jerry: Frantic Antics. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious to see how long you'd been editing an saw the speedy. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gone for a while. Cheers. People get so cheerful when they find their articles deleted. I've been working on deleting the speedies and some the email is so interesting. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll chime in with a "lol" at that one. :-) KOS | talk 05:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, what's this? Radiant! recently returned, and now you too! Is there something in the water? :-) Anyway, welcome back. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - great to see you back. My only involvement with you was gliding past User talk:Binzaman and that Why only Muslims? page back in January. All the best, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 07:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back Lucky!

Hey, good to see you back again :-) Ta bu shi da yu 12:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

username

I've blocked him. Thanks alphaChimp^(talk) 15:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

No one tells me anything :P - Glen 01:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there!

Hey! Hi there, Lucky! Bishonen | talk 01:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Welcome back from me as well Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Welcome back, though we haven't had a lot of interaction. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Push with characters.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Push with characters.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

So do you miss...

Well you seem to really be sticking around, so maybe these comments (A B) will be of use to you. NoSeptember 22:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! WP:BN is a fairly active board these days, and was made for such things. NoSeptember 23:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey, welcome back, and premature congrats on the re-adminship!-gadfium 23:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship

I have restored your adminship, per what I gather were your wishes. If I was incorrect in doing so, please let me know. Best of luck — Dan | talk 01:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol

I see you are right back into this, and I know how much stress it has caused you in the past. I don't know if you are familiar with the new Wikipedia:Proposed deletion system, which was being discussed at the time you left before and has since become policy. I it find a very convenient alternative to speedy deletion and AfD. Essentially, you put {{subst:prod|Reason for deletion}} on an article, and watchlist it. If the author doesn't come back and improve it within five days, it gets deleted automatically. The author or anyone else can legitimately remove the prod tag, but if they don't at least attempt to address the issue at the same time, then the article can be put up for AfD.-gadfium 05:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

trying to understand why you are deleting info about a new company?

Lucky, I am trying to understand why you deleted info about a new company that is founded in the Silicon Valley?

Deleted article

Can you step in and talk to this user? I warned him for creating the article Cumshit (which contained only his signature and which you deleted) and he's... um... not taking it well. He's concluded that I'm rampantly homophobic (which is hilarious for a number of reasons) and is being rather nasty about it. He might go away if we ignore it, but he keeps talking of "escalating" the situation (whatever that means). Um. Thanks? -- Merope 19:13, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm sure he'll see reason. *rolleyes* -- Merope 19:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay!

To all the users I've loved before... :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 02:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Interactive advergaming

Hey, I wanted to let you know that this article has been recreated---again! When I saw it come up on the new pages, I knew I recognized it, but could not remember who deleted it or when---though I was certain that it was within the last 48-72 hours. Sure enough, I check the deletes log, and there it is. This is just absolute garbage. I am going to tag it as db-repost. Is that kosher, so to speak? ---Charles 04:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, is there supposed to be some good reason for the constant recreation of this article? I see no value to it, and assumed it was just a malicious vandal---but, perhaps not. As far as the talkpage format, adapt away. Thanks. ---Charles 18:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Brownlee

Don't delete articles I'm working on thanks. Wjhonson 06:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You see me actively editing, and you say hmm maybe I should ask ? Wjhonson 06:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations of sock puppetry on the Center for Science in the Public Interest page

Allegations of sock puppetry have been made against some of the accounts that have edited the Center for Science in the Public Interest page. I have instigated the wiki process for handling such allegations. See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/David Justin. As someone who has contributed to the CSPI page, please add your views to the Comments section. You have up to 10 days to make comments on the allegation. Nunquam Dormio 19:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Am I wasting my time?

I create a stub, go to expand it, and find that about five seconds after I created it you've deleted it. I waited a bit to see if you would leave me a message to explain why, but you didn't. Am I wasting my time? Mr WR 18:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. When deleting an article, aren't you supposed to give a reason when doing so instead of just leaving the edit summary blank? I'm trying to learn here, but it's not easy! Mr WR 18:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. But this thing was, I'd started a stub, clicked save to check the layout, went back in to expand it and it was gone already. You deleted it about half a minute after I'd started it, and didn't give any kind of chance to work on it...Mr WR 07:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Welcome Back! :)

Yepp, well remmeber me "Wiki Brah." Well after you left last year they blocked me andd Maoririder like the next day can you please unblock my old account I promise that i will be behaved obrigado.Le Wiki Brah 03:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thank you~~!!! That's great but i was wondering if i could have my old user name back, my old accoutn, you were the only one that understood us.Le Wiki Brah 03:47, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so did you hear anything yet man?Le Wiki Brah 02:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What gives????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'm trying to creat that article Knights of St. Mulumba Briaboru

Thank you

Thank You that is helpful Briaboru

Ellen Knutsen

Don't know where to write this, so I'll try here.. Why did you delete the Ellen Knutsen-article I wrote? Please get back to me... Best regards, Kentpaulsen

Lucky, this article might have been a good place to have used the {{prod}} tag.-gadfium 08:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]