User talk:Freeknowledgecreator

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Covers

Hi there, FKC! I had some free time today, so I added several D&D articles. Would you be able to see if you can add cover images to Player's Secrets of Tuornen, Player's Secrets of Roesone, Player's Secrets of Endier, Player's Secrets of Ilien, Player's Secrets of Medoere, Giantcraft, The Iron Throne (Birthright novel), and The Titan of Twilight? Thanks for anything you can do! BOZ (talk) 03:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BOZ. I'll look for appropriate images for all of those articles soon. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 05:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! BOZ (talk) 12:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there FKC! Thank you so much for your edits to the page. We are the media studio that has produced this film. The title of the film has been changed from 'Proposition for a Revolution' to 'An Insignificant Man'. The change has been made in the text by an unregistered user named Sohailk711. However we would like to make the change in the article's title. Could you, being a registered and verified user please do the same. This is the website of the film that confirms the title change- insignificantman.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manoj Rahul P V (talk • contribs) 10:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Bettelheim

I'm working on some changes to the lead, probably for next week. Think there's a good chance you'll like them. Asking myself, what if I were back in college and a professor asked, Hey, what's the situation with this Bettelheim character? So, an answer which is meaty, substantial, supported, formally written.

Now, I have thanked you for helping me for my writing, and you have. You have not yet thanked me for finding references and adding solid information to the article, which you don't necessarily need to, although it might be a nice idea. FriendlyRiverOtter (talk) 00:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

discussion is better

It will be more productive if you are willing to discuss matters rather than use your Twinkle to revert everything. Discussion between us can result in agreement and article improvement. If you are heavy handed, this is not constructive.

Are you in Auckland? Did you cut down the tree in One True Hill? Don't blame Twinkle. Samswik (talk) 09:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]