Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Series Wrestling

International Assault article has been deleted, therefore this article serves no purpose Normy132 03:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why does it follow that the article "serves no purpose"? Not a great article perhaps, but why is WSW to be deleted because one promotion was deleted? --Ogdred 03:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Because that is all WSW ever did. If the promotion only promoted one show and that show has been deemed worthy of being non-notable, why should the promotion be any more notbale thatn the show it promoted? Normy132 04:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RobJ1981 06:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete given that its notability rests solely on something whose notability was insufficient for inclusion. Looks like wrestlecruft to me. Guy 13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm detecting a bit of sour grapes here. A quick trip through the (hist) shows that the nominator was the primary editor for this page. It sounds to me that Normy was on the losing end of a AfD debate for the International Assault page, and has decided that it logically follows that WSW is non notable too. I don't agree. Might I suggest that you could combine the old information from the International Assault article into this one, and create one good article from two incomplete ones? --Roninbk 14:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Robinbk. The nom has given no reason to delete here, except the precedent set on a now-deleted article. Ogdred 22:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- "Holy typo, Batman..." --Roninbk 08:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]