Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golaghat Gymkhana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (talk | contribs) at 23:12, 9 January 2017 (Updating nomination page with notices (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Golaghat Gymkhana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable club. Virtually zero hits on the search engines (except to the club's own website, and a single trivial mention on Books). Current sourcing consists solely of the trivial mention. Onel5969 TT me 11:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose because Wikipedia is not based on # of search engine hits. The page has been updated with sources and it shows that the place has been mentioned in various travel journals, including this artcile in The Telegraph (an Indian national broadsheet newspaper). The current page in its structure is a credible Wikipedia article. AnjanBorah (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as clear A7 and G11 material and it's clear this is a miseuse of our policies as advertising, any article that cares to mention "amenities and services for people" is advertising. SwisterTwister talk 03:35, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep as the material in its present form contains objective facts - all citing sources thus, cannot be ruled as advertising! It may be improved further, but I had edited the page to keep it neutral as much as possible. Sorry, but the page informs about a historical building that has been featured in national newspapers, so advertising claim doesn't hold true. Only one line about a few of the facilities and that is again with sources, so that doesn't suggest or emphasise any pleasantness or attractiveness of the place or amenities and services for people. AnjanBorah (talk) 14:11, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 11:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 23:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 23:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]