User talk:Pingumeister

Pingumeister, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Pingumeister! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pingumeister, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. We're so glad you're here! Anastasia (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi Pingumeister. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Pingumeister^(talk) 21:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Igor Girkin‎

Many things use DD-MM-YYYY or MM-DD-YYYY, but YYYY-MM-DD ought to be preferred because it has the least national bias. Dustin (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is, that makes up another part of my reasoning changing the formatting. It took like twenty minutes due to being required to change them manually. Dustin (talk) 17:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DD Month YYYY is used in related articles such as Donetsk People's Republic, Federal State of Novorossiya and MH17 (somewhat related). And I'm sorry your consistency edit took so long Dustin V. S., but mine also took 15–20 minutes to complete. -- Pingumeister^(talk) 17:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was it the fact that didn't write out the month? Dustin (talk) 17:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Dustin V. S.: Personally, I think writing out the month looks nicer, but personal preference isn't the problem here. YYYY-MM-DD doesn't seem to be very standard. Most featured articles don't appear to use numeric months (don't quote me on that though, I sampled randomly). And again, Igor Girkin only used YYYY-MM-DD in automatic reflinks citations. The properly formatted citations (which constituted nearly half of the citations in the article) used DD Month YYYY, making that the standard in the article. -- Pingumeister^(talk) 17:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been nominated for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation!

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. Click the following link for more details: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Merchandise_giveaways/Nominations. Please send me an email (jmatthews@wikimedia.org) for instructions on how to claim your shirt. Thank you again for all you do! --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mbah Gotho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stylianos Kallenos

Hello, Pingumeister. I wanted to let you know that the reference you asked from the article, Stylianos Kallenos was added, please remove the article from the progress for delete articles because now have the criteria as a biography of a living person article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, -- ChrisAnorthosis 20:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harmont & Blaine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pingumeister. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hello Pingumeister. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 13,500 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- Samtar ^{talk · contribs} 14:43, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Đặng Anh Tuấn

Hi Pingumeister I apologize but I am unsure why Đặng Anh Tuấn is tagged for deletion. The article should meet WP:NFOOTY as the subject has played multiple times in a fully professional league (V.League 1). The fact that he played in it is backed up by the soccerway reference in the article. The article should meet the WP:GNG as a result and if it doesn't please let me know why. Thank you Inter&anthro (talk) 20:51, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake, have removed the tag. Very new to that particular guideline! -- Pingumeister^(talk) 20:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problems, I bear some of the responsibility too as the initial article isn't the best and I only put in one reference. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposed deletion of Kerry Lee Crawford

I'm really confused why you took a brand new article that does not meet WP:N and is completely unsourced to AfD. You'd be better of closing the AfD and nominating the article for speedy deletion. {MordeKyle} ☢ 00:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read WP:A7 carefully and see my reply at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Lee Crawford -- Pingumeister^(talk) 14:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final Problem Review

Sorry, I just wanted to say I only removed it because I thought it would be easier to wait until a consensus had been reached rather than trying to start any sort of edit war. Sorry if it was any trouble -124.188.232.125 (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries – I didn't assume it was removed maliciously. Cheers. -- Pingumeister^(talk) 00:50, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that, the other anon seemed to believe it was some kind of personal attack.

-124.188.232.125 (talk) 06:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]