Talk:Seabee

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Old and uncategorized

Another REALLY MESSED UP PAGE which causes the whole thing to run into the right margin. We are encountering more and more of these where tables are being used. -- Zoe

Could you produce a screenshot of this and upload it? I and not experiencing trouble when I downsize my browser window. --mav

Now it looks fine. Was the table changed? -- Zoe

Seabee information

This entry is a good one, but it is more of a Press Release. While it has good general information summarizing the Seabees, it lacks depth. Heck, there isn't even a link to the IMDB entry on The Fighting Seabees ;-)

I was wondering if there are any other current or former Seabees (such as myself) who would like to help work on a new entry. I was thinking of expanding a bit on the history (maybe doing a separate entry on the CEC), going over the ratings (SW, BU, EA, CE, UT, EO, CM), and the current state of the Seabees.

Despite what the current article states, Seabees have units other than NMCBs and PHIBCBs. Naval Construction Force Support Units (NCFSU) are another type of unit, plus Seabees are also involved in the First Lieutenant's office on many (if not all) US Navy bases and Underwater Construction Teams (UCT).

Anyone interested?

References to individual stories, maybe even just links to outside websites that have some, might be especially useful. They make it easy to get a feel for the sort of work the Seabees do. Durahan

A lot of this page is taken verbatim from the Seabee website for the Navy CEC

Would like to get our beginning history corrected. Please add our Camp Allen, Camp Bradford history. REF http://hamptonroadsnavalmuseum.blogspot.com/2015/08/remembering-project-much-bigger-than.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfogienmcb7 (talk • contribs) 10:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure the Bees still started at Davisville, including training. Not saying it didn't happen at Camp Allen and Camp Bradford, but the way that page reads, that was where we started, and from what I know, that just isn't the case. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 06:59, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Notable Seabees" I am wondering, since it even says it in the page, that since the designer of the SeaBee emblem that gave us the image known today later actually JOINED the Bees later that year, that he deserves an entry in that list? I feel it is right to put it in, even though he is mentioned elsewhere, but since he actually DID join the Bees, he deserves that mention there as well. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 07:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed

to singular from plural, following Wikipedia naming policy —Morven 23:54, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)

contradiction

Is it just me or do the statements supported by references one and two directly contradict each other? 24.150.45.19 (talk) 07:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't just you, but I fixed it. Smartguy777 (talk) 06:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Trivia

Richard Karn the actor who played Al Borland on Home Improvement was A Seabee too.He was a BU3(Builder Third Class)in the 70's stationed at CBC Port Hueneme, Calif.He was in NMCB 3 or 5 cannot remember which.Butch Tavares of the 70's disco/soul group Tavares was also a Seabee and also a BU3 in either NMCB 3 or 5 from 72 until 76.

Lou Santiago, who I first became aware of because of the PowerBlock automobile related shows on Spike TV, was a SeaBee as well. John Wayne was not a SeaBee, although he DID play one on TV (or movies, same idea). 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo specific trivia, I remember hearing before that the actual ORIGINAL SeaBee logo used a giant capital letter Q as the outer edge of the design, to honor Quonset Point (unofficial name), the accepted birthplace of the SeaBees, but was later (possibly even before official adoption) changed to a hawser rope to further accent the U.S. Navy attachment. I heard this from talking to people, I do not know if there is any documentation that can be accepted as standard for being included on the page. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to above. Have to presume this is accurate, but found link at http://aville94thbattalion.tripod.com/id3.html describing the origin of the SeaBee emblem including verification that the capital Q was in fact a part of the original design. Adding this (with link reference) to the main page. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two merchandise links - which is the official one?

Link http://www.shop.seabeesmuseum.com/main.sc seems to be correct, since it's the same site as the museum, but today a merchandise link was added to http://www.seabeemuseumstore.org/shop/homepage.php as well. Which is the official site? --CliffC (talk) 20:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Popular culture

I've tagged the "In popular culture" section because none of the claims are referenced, and because none of them seem to meet the requirements outlined in the tag. If those requirements aren't met within a reasonable period, I'm thinking of deleting the whole section. Lou Sander (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

service

do seabees typically serve on ships or are they land based?

Today they are land based. In the 1940s and 1950s they traveled by ship and were actually stationed on atemporary landling field ship.

When I was in, it was generally a land based assignment, but I am sure, like the Marines, if a ride somewhere was needed, they would be taken there. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin Translation

The root verb Construo means "to pile; to load up; to build". Construimus means "we build [it or them] up". Pugno means merely "to fight; to do battle". Batuo, on the other hand, translated literally means "to pound, beat, or strike"; it can also mean to hit with a weapon, like a baculus (club or mace). The verb implies beating somebody bloody, smashing something to bits with your bare hands, or beating it with a stick. Batuimus therefore means "we beat [it or them] down". Hotspur23 (talk)

Well, the Bees DO fight back if someone is attacking one of the projects they work on, although when I went through, most of us used M-16s to "beat them down" if necessary. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uniforms

Does anyone have information about uniform regs for Seabees? I have recently seen them in the NWU and a woodland variant (not MARPAT colors) out of NCBC Gulfport, though they participated in the area Veterans' day parade with the whole contingent in BDUs. Noderaser (talk) 23:57, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When I was in CBMU 202, USNR, the standard uniform of the day was what many would consider Woodland Camo, same style that the Marines used. In fact, the cover we had was almost a direct equivalent to the USMC version, with the "stop sign top", minus the globe and anchor emblem found on the front panel. Of course, this was back in '96-'97 time frame, and IDK the standard version Bee uniform worn today, but I would presume it is still very similar to standard Marine dress. While visiting the SeaBee museum at Davisville, RI, I saw a uniform display, and they also had the digital camo pattern being shown there. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 07:09, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

I moved the article under the current name and created a disambiguation page. It might take a while until I fix all redirects and such. Help is always welcome. Tupsumato (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 17:13, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seabee → Seabee (disambiguation); Seabee (United States Navy) → Seabee – The U.S. Navy Seabees are the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the "Seabee" term; the move to the disambiguated name was undiscussed and unneeded based on WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:COMMONNAME. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support I went through the full list of Seabee articles and the others are either redirects or stubs. I see no reason to believe that this is not the primary topic.--Labattblueboy (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support What he said. Highspeed (talk) 07:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, Navy is primary. LCS check (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

SEABEE Image Wrong?

Being a regular Navy (ABHAN) of three years, a Seabee vet of 6 years (after the previous, leaving as a BU2), and an Iraqi veteran with the "Bees"; am I wrong in assuming the Seabee image on this page is wrong? Originally our image was drawn using all 3rd class petty officers (a "crow" and one chevron but definitely no rocker on the top). Later (from my understanding with my battalion) it changed to an image with the bee having from one chevron to all three chevrons. To my knowledge I have never heard of our bee being a chief (which the only rank that might work is the third leg of the bee) ever being a chief. The first two legs of the "bee" (in this image), in my knowledge, do not exist having "rockers" on top of one or even two chevrons. If I am incorrect please let me know; as I love my bees and serving with them. I am now trying to collect memorabilia. Any feedback would be nice. Just trying to keep my facts straight. Thank you. 2001:5B0:22FF:1CF0:0:0:0:3A (talk) 04:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I was in the active reserves with the Bees, iirr, the emblem was (front to back) standard 3rd 2nd and 1st Class Petty Officer emblems/chevrons with no top rockers like you would see on Chief (or higher) rank. That looks more like what you might see on Marine or Army rank patches, because starting at E-7, you still had the full 3 chevrons carried over from 1st Class PO. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recently went to visit the Bee museum in Davisville (only second time in my life so far, hopefully more in the future), and found out some information about the Fighting Bee design. Originally, according to the design by Frank Iafrate, the Fighting Bee only ever was a Third Class PO, and the mini Bee inside the museum main building, and the large original Fighting Bee outside show this original design. In fact, point of history, Frank was there to make sure that the Fighting Bee in Davisville was repainted with the correct colors and design. I believe the "official" design was modified at some point to show (from front to back) Third, Second, and First Class PO chevrons, but to my knowledge, the official Bee was never granted Chief (or higher) rank. That being said, I am far from an official source in any stretch of the imagination. I only served in active reserves in my unit for about a year and a half. 32.212.104.223 (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]