Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Hope Church
Contested prod. Prod concern was "A church; no assertion or evidence of notability". Deprodder gave no edit summary or comment. Article contains no references to independent reliable sources that could evidence meeting WP:ORG. GRBerry 01:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:RS and Alexa Web Traffic ranking of 760,781. --Nishkid64 01:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for heaven's sake. Also contrary to the spirit of WP:SPAM and not a soapbox. Pascal.Tesson 01:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom and also POV.--K-UNIT 01:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for obvious reasons. —dustmite 01:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, spam, soapbox, POV, RS, take your pick. — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 02:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Just bad on so many levels. It's almost an ad. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 03:44, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No citations; fails WP:ADS, WP:ORG and Soapbox criterias; as well as POV.--TBCTaLk?!? 03:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete for all the reasons stated above. NawlinWiki 03:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyvio of [1] eaolson 04:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Note that it can't be speedily deleted as a copyvio anymore, since it's existed for more than 48 hours.--TBCTaLk?!? 05:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio and POV. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio, nn, spam etc... Localzuk (talk) 11:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not notable, advert, and in agreement with the points above doktorb wordsdeeds 17:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above, nn, soapbox. --Shirahadasha 17:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds like an ad more than anything else. --physicq210 19:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly an advert, no assertion of notability --JaimeLesMaths 01:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)