Jump to content

Wikipedia:Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Acsteitz (talk | contribs) at 14:35, 2 February 2017 (→Referencing errors on CafePress: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    ↑ To top of page
    Shortcuts
    Welcome—ask questions about how to use or edit Wikipedia! (Am I in the right place?)
    • For other types of questions, use the search box, see the reference desk or Help:Contents. If you have comments about a specific article, use that article's talk page.
    • Do not provide your email address or any other contact information. Answers will be provided on this page only.
    • If your question is about a Wikipedia article, draft article, or other page on Wikipedia, tell us what it is!
    • Check back on this page to see if your question has been answered.
    • For real-time help, use our IRC help channel, #wikipedia-en-help.
    • New editors may prefer the Teahouse, a help area for beginners (but please don't ask in both places).
    Ask a question

    January 30

    Referencing errors on Squanto

    Reference help requested.

    I got a message saying that there is an "unsupported parameter error" on an edit I performed in Squanto. I do not see what the error is. Since there were several reference changes in that edit, could you explain what the bot is pointing to? AnthroMimus (talk) 00:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I think I just resolved it. Sorry for jumping the gun. AnthroMimus (talk) 00:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, AnthroMimus (talk) 00:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    No such parameter called |piblisher=.
    —Trappist the monk (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Make images larger?

    At User:Bubba73#Historic_places, how can I make the three images of the state of Georgia larger, but side by side? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 00:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Help:Gallery tag#Attributes and values says:
    • widths= Image widths in pixels (has no effect if mode is set to packed, packed-overlay, packed-hover, or slideshow)
    You can combine mode=packed with heights= instead of widths=. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Bubba73: For example, you could add: heights="250px" as another "mode" parameter inside the "gallery" tags. More gory details at: WP:Picture_tutorial. DonFB (talk) 02:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I think I got it now. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 02:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]
    Resolved

    Referencing errors on Gurbani Judge

    Reference help requested. I was told that there is a format error in a reference I had cited. I don't see the error and would like some help. This is the sixth reference on the Gurbani Judge wiki. Please help. Varunr (talk) 06:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks, Varunr (talk) 06:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Varunr: I've fixed it by adding the missing "http://" at the start of the URL. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:06, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    1932

    "This article and its editors are subject to Wikipedia's general sanctions: All edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, are placed under discretionary sanctions. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning."

    Why 1932?

    Benjamin (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The question is asked and answered at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#1932. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Benjamin (talk) 10:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    changing logo & editing content

    Hello,

    I would like to edit this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scandinavian_Tobacco_Group by adding my company*s new logo and changing the text. I have added text in the back end and for some reason not all the changes have been applied when publish. Please advise.

    Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreayoung (talk • contribs) 10:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The first thing you need to do is to read about conflict of interest and paid editing. I notice also that many of the references which you have recently added are to the company website. Wikipedia is not interested in what the subject has to say about itself; instead, Wikipedia relies on published reliable sources independent of the subject. Where you say "not all the changes have been applied when publish", are you referring to where you have tried to use parameters which don't exist in the relevant infobox template, such as "Traded as" (which is shown as a warning in page preview when you are editing the [page)? You need to remember that in general, page names and parameters in Wikipedia are case sensitive. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks! any advice on changing the logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreayoung (talk • contribs) 12:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Andreayoung. If the new version you which to upload is in the same file format and essentially the same as File:Scandinavian Tobacco Group logo.jpg, except smaller in size, cropped, of straightened, etc., then you can simply upload it by going to the file's page and clicking "Upload a new version of this file". If, however, it is significantly different such as different in design, color, file format, etc., then you should upload the new version as a completely new file. You can do this by using Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard. If you're not sure how to do this, you can ask for help at WP:MCQ or WP:FFU. As long as you provide a url for the file so that it can be downloaded and it's copyright status can be verified, then someone at either of those noticeboards should be able to help you or do it for you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Updating the logo is the kind of uncontroversial action that you are probably OK doing even with your COI Andreayoung (but you need to make that declaration before you do anything else). Please see WP:LOGOS to understand the background of using non-free logos, and WP:UPI#Updating existing image for the mechanics. You won't be able to do this until your are AUTOCONFIRMED, but that should happen in about nineteen hours.
     --ColinFine (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    What is inappropriate about "pinging"?

    One editor does not take kindly to being "pinged," as he/she calls it. Every time I discuss something with another editor, i make sure I include his name in full style, i.e User:such-and-such in brackets. It's a standard practice of mine aimed to simply facilitate the reader. My question is, whether this is considered bona fide "pinging" and, if so, whether this would be considered inappropriate or offensive or a type of stalking, harassment, etc. Although, I've been an editor here for a number of years, this is the first time I encounter such a complaint. Thanks in advance. -The Gnome (talk) 12:10, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually, when somebody is having an active conservation with someone on some talk page or so they usually watchlist it so that any changes/addition /alteration automatically pops up in front of their eyes.Now, many editors don't like being repeatedly pinged every time one post a reply or opinion in a particular discussion since it clutters the notification box without doing any real good.Also pinging other editors at random without any proper reason can be sometimes considered as disruptive. The best way out is obviouly to not ping the concerned editor any more in that particular discussion. Hope, this satisfies you. Winged Blades Godric 13:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    W.r.t to the chain of events that led you here, pinging an user three times or so in a single reply esp. when there are multiple active content disputes between you and the user, could be deemed as disruptive.Winged Blades Godric 13:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Also if you want to link names without pinging someone you can use the {{Noping}} template. - GB fan 15:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    How to go from Draft to published?

    I have an entry that is in the draft stage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Raymond_Snell How do I get it approved for regular viewing? Dale Dailey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dale Dailey (talk • contribs) 13:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey Dale Dailey. You can submit your draft for review by a volunteer with our Articles for Creation project, by pasting {{AFC submission}} to the top of the page. This will add the draft to a list of submissions pending review.
    However, in its current state, your draft seems unlikely to be accepted because it is almost entirely referenced to the individuals autobiography. In order to show that a subject meets Wikipedia's standards for notability, you need to demonstrate that the subject has received in-depth coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Since an autobiography is written by the subject themselves, it doesn't count as independent. It's still fine to use that as a source for information, but other sources are needed to demonstrate that the subject received sufficient outside attention to qualify for their own article. TimothyJosephWood 13:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I have taken the liberty of tweaking the headings and some layout anomalies more in line with MoS. Now it just needs better referencing as noted by TJW above. Eagleash (talk) 13:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Problem with Yotsuya Kaidan page

    Someone has gone through the page about Yutsuda Kaidan and changed character names to "lemon." I don't know the story, so I don't know which characters they are supposed to be. Sorry if I am submitting this information in the wrong way, but I can't find the right way to report it. Thanks! --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.76.14.229 (talk • contribs)

    Thanks for pointing this out, IP user. It confused me and (from the history) several other editors. The character's name is "Iemon", starting with a capital "I"! So there's nothing wrong with the article. For future reference, the best place to point out problems in a particular article is on that article's talk page: in this case, Talk:Yotsuya Kaidan. --ColinFine (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)I thought at first that it was vandalism by a recent couple of IP edits (and undid them). However the page was created a decade ago with the name Lemon. Google reveals this page where the name is also shown as Lemon. (I have undone my edit!). But thanks for pointing this out. Eagleash (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Eagleash: If you re-read the page to which you gave the link, you'll see that the text of the page has "Iemon", it's in the comments where a number of readers of the page commented that they had misread it as "Lemon". --David Biddulph (talk) 13:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    See Yotsuya Kaidan#endnote iemon. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. I spotted that just too late. Eagleash (talk) 13:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Reminds me of how Loituma's song "Ievan polkka" (the first word being the genitive case of a local form of Eva) is sometimes listed as "Levan's polka". —Tamfang (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Comic Relief

    I submitted a correction to the Comic Relief page yesterday, more accurately reflecting the origins of Comic Relief. All the facts contained therein can be verified. The correction has today been taken down and some inaccurate changes have been made to the existing copy reflecting truer dates, but not those involved, as notified in my submission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bramwell47 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The article Comic Relief has not been edited since January 19th. You added a section to its talk page yesterday; what you added is still there. If you want to make an addition to the article itself, you should include references. Maproom (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Problem with the Armenian language code?

    According to ISO 3166-1#Current codes, the code for Armenia is 'am' but when used in {{am icon}}, it comes up as 'Amharic', which Google tells me is the official language of Ethiopia. Should I be using some other list for language codes, as opposed to country codes? Thanks, Leschnei (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The header in Category:Language icon templates gives a link to List of ISO 639-2 codes, and the notes on the category page confirm that the codes are not always the same as country codes. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah ha! - that it explains it. Following a few links from Category:Language icon templates led to this, {{link language|arm}}, which works. Thanks for your help, Leschnei (talk) 14:57, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    If you want the equivalent to {{am icon}}, it would be {{hy icon}}. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    More choices - thanks again Leschnei (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I'm trying to get to grips with the ISBN magic link & it just does not seem to work for me. I'm typing ISBN[space]978[hyphen]then the rest of the 13 digit code. This does not convert to magic link on saving. Please help - I'm wasting other people's time tidying my work! JasperWare (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It works without the hyphen... ISBN 9783895610349. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:21, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict)Magic Links will *eventually* go away. Please use the ISBN template like {{ISBN|193151447X}} which is much superior (and checks your ISBN to make sure that the check digit is valid. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Future_of_magic_links as well. Naraht (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @JasperWare: At Burkhard Spinnen the magic links are not working because they are enclosed in <nowiki>...</nowiki> tags. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:32, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Marking an article as not notable

    Hello, how do I mark an article as "not notable"? The article in question is this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pickle_(Python) GBMorris (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey GBMorris. I believe what you are referring to is Template:Notability. TimothyJosephWood 19:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    GBMorris One way to solve the problem is to carry out the proposed merge. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Timothyjosephwood and Dodger67. In general, how can I find pages like the Template:Notability page? The navigation path is not obvious to me... GBMorris (talk) 13:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey GBMorris. The easiest way to access the most commonly used of the large number (400+) of such templates is to enable semi-automated tagging with Wikipedia:Twinkle. You can read through that linked page for additional information. Twinkle takes a little bit of getting used to, but it makes things much easier.
    Other than Twinkle, there is Category:Article message templates, but it doesn't differentiate between the most commonly used templates (probably a few dozen that make up 90%+ of all usage), and ones that may be used rarely or not at all. TimothyJosephWood 13:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I would add though that using these templates doesn't actually solve the problem, and the main effect is to add the page to WP:BACKLOG for someone to fix later. Some of these backlogs are massive, as in tens of thousands of articles, so if the only thing that is done is to add a cleanup template and move on, it could literally be ten years or more until the problem gets fixed. TimothyJosephWood 13:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    All very true. I make use of this page when choosing a tag: WP:CLEANUPTAG. DonFB (talk) 13:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey! There we go. I looked and looked for this and was really surprised I couldn't find anything better than a category. TimothyJosephWood 13:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia page for Thomas B. Sheridan

    Please add my latest book to my book publication list:

    Models of Human-System Interaction: Philosophical and Methodological Consideratons, with Examples, Hoboken NJ, John Wiley, 2017.

    Thanks you.

    T. Sheridan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.235.45 (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done You are correct in not editing the article about yourself, Mr Sheridan, because of our "conflict of interest" policy. For any further changes you may wish to suggest to this article, a procedure available for your use is described at this page: Noyster (talk), 22:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    January 31

    Judge Thomas Hardiman's religion?

    What is the religion of Supreme-Court Nominee Judge Thomas Hardiman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.185.77.119 (talk) 00:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 5.3 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck.Template:Z25 --David Biddulph (talk) 01:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Nothing about this question implies the person is astray. It's just a general knowledge question which belongs at the reference desk.Template:Z150 Pppery 01:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    This page is for questions about using Wikipedia. Please consider asking this question at the Humanities reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps. Pppery 01:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Please sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~) or clicking the signature button above the edit box which looks like this: , but do not sign in articles. Pppery 01:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Signing Posts

    Can someone help me how I can sign my posts here? In the german Wiki four tildes works just fine, but here this happens: -- (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC) So my User name is not displayed directly but only two hyphens which are a link to my User page.[reply]

    My guess is that you may have tried to customise your signature at Special:Preferences. Go to the Signature section on that page, remove everything in the box labelled "Signature:", and uncheck the box labelled "Treat the above as wiki markup". --David Biddulph (talk) 03:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    "sanctuary cities" in Canada

    As a Police Officer in Canada for almost 30 yrs, I have never heard of the so-called, "sanctuary cities" in Canada. I regularly arrested a variety of criminals on various charges (and sometimes :suspicion of"). If it was determined that they were not, Canadian Citizens or Landed Immigrants, Immigration (now called CBSA) was notified and their investigation was started. I worked on multi-jurisdictional files and never heard of, "sanctuary cities", in Canada. I think someone is trying to paint us as something we are not. Canada vigorously persues all persons illegally in our country and all levels of Law Enforcement co-operate in this endeavour.....just look at the 6 o'clock news and see reports of people trying to by-pass the system by seeking refuge in a Church. The term,"sanctuary city" has never (to my knowledge; unless it was during the,"war of 1812" or something) been used to describe a Canadian city or a municipal ideology. Whoever reads this, please challenge the original author as to the validity of,"sanctuary city". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.179.50 (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Officer: I think you may be referring to the Wikipedia article Sanctuary city, which includes a very brief passage identifying Toronto and Hamilton as sanctuary cities. If you look at that portion of the article, you will notice footnotes supporting the statement. In fact, I added a reference for a separate news report about Toronto, as its status was mentioned only in passing in one of the two previously existing references. Also, just for your information, articles in Wikipedia are written by multiple people; there is no single author for a given article. DonFB (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I find that article questionable. Apparently I have been living in a "sanctuary city" for the last 40 years, without ever being aware of it. The truth is that some cities are, officially or unofficially, more welcoming to undocumented refugees than others. But they are not "places of sanctuary" with a power to ovrrule the laws of their nation, as the article appears to imply. Maproom (talk) 08:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The sanctuary city phenomenon of recent years seems to have flown beneath the radar of both the Canadian officer and yourself--though it's possible the issue receives more publicity in the U.S. than in your respective countries. No doubt, many people think such a civic and social movement is questionable; perhaps, some will also take a similarly jaundiced view of an article describing the subject. DonFB (talk) 12:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't find the movement questionable, indeed I am pleased that the authorities of my home city try to be accommodating to undocumented refugees. What I question is whether there is anything substantive to this "sanctuary" status. Maproom (talk) 16:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    GEMS

    Good day

    Will you be able to put on your page about GEMS (Government Employ Medical Scheme). This is in South Africa and there is a webpage but not fully clear about it164.151.131.114 (talk) 10:23, 31 January 2017

    We do not currently have an article about the Government Employees Medical Scheme (I've corrected the name). Having searched several South African mainstream news sources the subject seems very likely to pass the Notability standard for organisations. I'd strongly recommend that you first read the Your first article guideline and then ask WP:WikiProject South Africa for assistance. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Whoops

    I recently deleted a portion of an article that I didn't mean to. Is there anyway I can easily restore the article to its original state? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinreik (talk • contribs) 12:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please provide a link to the article concerned. Your only edits seem to be to Draft:Fulvio Martusciello. You can resore a previous version of a page by clicking on the date in the history (link at top of the article page). This will display the page at that time. By clicking on 'edit source' and then saving, the page will be restored. Alternatively, if you are referring to one edit and it is the last edit you can click on 'undo' and then save and it will restore. Please leave an appropriate edit summary. Please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I recently made the mistake of deleting some information from an article that I did not create. Is it possible to revert the page to its original form if I did not create the page originally?

    The page that was accidentally edited was,

    https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulvio_Martusciello

    Any help would be appreciated

    Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinreik (talk • contribs) 14:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Just click on "History" (Chronologia) then "Undo" (Annulla). Dbfirs 14:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I have undone the edit and left an edit summary pointing here. - GB fan 14:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    editing

    how do you create a new page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Mou (talk • contribs) 12:34, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey Mr Mou. You may want to read our written tutorial at WP:Your First Article, or check out the interactive Wikipedia tutorial at WP:The Wikipedia Adventure. TimothyJosephWood 14:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Breaks in a row of icons

    Is there a way to make a break in a row of icons like User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/article work? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I think you can just start a new row by inserting |- at an appropriate spot. Like so, for example:
    ......Laguna Amarga that was displayed on the Main Page on the 30th of June 2016.|cat=}}
    |-
    |<br/>{{click|link=Taryatu-Chulutu........
    DonFB (talk) 13:10, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thx. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    FinDev / TransGaming Wrong Article

    Error: Protected edit requests can only be made on the talk page. Hi, In December 2016 TransGaming Inc. (the Canadian public company) completed a Change Of Business to investing in and financing real estate transactions, and changed its name to FinDev Inc. See: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/findev-inc-formerly-transgaming-inc-closes-proposed-cob-trading-commence-under-fdi-tsx-venture-fdi-2180728.htm

    The TransGaming brand, as well as the business of Games for Connected TV devices were sold to General Media Ventures, a UK company, and is now operating under a new UK company named TransGaming Interactive Limited. See: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/transgaming-signs-agreement-sell-gametree-200000606.html

    The Wikipedia article is currently a mixture of both companies. here are the companies' websites to put things in order: FinDev - http://findev.ca TransGaming - https://www.transgaming.com Please help correct this situation. I have posted this on the Talk page but received no response.

    Thanks, Tamir Goren CEO, TransGaming Interactive Limited — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamir Goren (talk • contribs) 14:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Notification

    This has probably been answered somewhere before, but... I was curious, why don't I automatically get a notification when someone replies to me on a talk page? Benjamin (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The conditions under which you get a notification are laid out at WP:Notifications. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I read the page and it didn't answer my question. Benjamin (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Except for your own talk page, the only way for you to get a notification is if someone tags you in the reply. So, when I add @Benjaminikuta: then you will be notified. (Note: this must be done in the same edit that I sign the reply with) †dismas†|(talk) 18:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I know that's how it works, but why is it made to be that way? It would be nice if I could be able to be notified. Has there ever been attempts to fix this in the past? Benjamin (talk) 18:33, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    As for the why, I don't know. I would guess that people figure that's what a watchlist is for. If you're engaged in a conversation on, for example, Talk:Tulip then I would suppose that the developers thought you'd put that page on your watchlist. By saying "attempt to fix", you seem to be assuming that something is broken. You might want to ask at WP:VPT and get a technical answer as to why the software doesn't do this now. Again, another guess, the site would have to look at every talk page edit, see who is editing, look at the subject header of the section, look up all the users who had commented in that section thus far, and notify each one. With the number of talk pages, discussions, and users, that could take up quite a bit of database lookup time. †dismas†|(talk) 18:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    How could the program determine who's being replied to? Indenting is often not done correctly, so it could be a significant logic problem with many "false reads". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know, why not make it kinda like reddit? Benjamin (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    How does Reddit do it? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Threads and notifications happen automatically. Benjamin (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Is that a wiki or is it an old-style "bulletin board" type of structure? Or something else? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 20:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It's a fairly popular social media site. Obviously Wikipedia isn't social media, but I just use it as an example. Benjamin (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Reddit uses a structured discussion system. Wikitext doesn't. Flow does, and does provide notifications. Pppery 20:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Forgot about Flow. And from what I see at here, it was removed from trials. †dismas†|(talk) 22:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Bugs, you can see how Reddit does things here, for example. †dismas†|(talk) 22:16, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Interesting. Looks like a hybrid of traditional bulletin board threads and wiki text threads. Presumably the reddit method is geared toward responding very specifically. The relatively free-form wikitext method doesn't allow for that. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 23:20, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Category overlap tool

    Is there a tool somewhere that will generate a list of articles that have an overlap of two categories? For example, Abandoned drugs and Experimental drugs. Natureium (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Take a look at PetScan, there is an external link on that page.uhhlive (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request Edit

    Good Morning,

    Could we change our look on the Brevard College page, under athletics we would like to use our new logo.

    Thank you.file:///C:/Users/swansojt/Desktop/Logos/Conference%20Logos/BCTornado%20copy.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.235.248.22 (talk) 16:07, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    That file is located on your computer, which we can't access. Do you have an external link to a website? uhhlive (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Uhhlive: Probably the request refers to Brevard College#Athletics, and logos can be found at Google with this request: https://www.google.com/search?q=brevard+college+tornados+basketball+logo&tbm=isch (not sure, however, if they are appropriate for Wikipedia with regard to copyright). --CiaPan (talk) 19:29, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Moving article

    Want to move User:USA-Fan/callus shaver to callus shaver but I haven´t the button to move this page. Can´t find any description to do this. --USA-Fan (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    USA-Fan, you can move pages when you're autoconfirmed, which should be the case for you on 19:47 UTC. In the meantime you can request a move by prepending {{subst:submit}} to your article, according to WP:NOTRM, which can take some though so I recommend you to wait until you get your move button. – Giftpflanze 16:45, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Fine. I think in two hours I´ll still be online. Thank you, "Poisounus plant". :) --USA-Fan (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    But, USA-Fan, I strongly recommend that you don't move the article to main space yet, because it is not ready for that, and may get deleted. Please read WP:YFA and WP:42, and add some references to reliable sources. At present it has just one reference, to a German site (which is not a problem in itself, but English sources are preferred if they exist). Most of the text is unreferenced - there is not even a source that establishes that "Callus shaver" is the English name for this implement. I will add {{userspace draft}} to the top of it, and I recommend that you use the "review" button when you have added some sources. --ColinFine (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for answering. I know it is the correct name and I also have a source, but I can´t put this in the article, because this kind of reference is not allowed (https://www.amazon.com/Body-Toolz-Callus-Shaver-Stainless/dp/B001TJIOAY/ref=sr_1_5_s_it?s=beauty&ie=UTF8&qid=1485883072&sr=1-5&keywords=callus+shaver). ;) But look, Giftpflanze told I´ve got some time until I get my "move button". It´s time enough to find some references in english and maybe I can use the references also in german (the german article was written by me). :) --USA-Fan (talk) 17:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It's pretty easy to find good-quality English sources for things like this in book search. The correct title to move to will be in sentence case: Callus shaver. Dicklyon (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Good idea. Allready found the first. ;) --USA-Fan (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Laney Amplification Update Request

    I run all Social Media for the Guitar and Bass Amplification company called Laney Amplification.

    The Wikipedia page is severely out of date and I can not update it.

    Our logo along with vital information about our owner, family, past and present amplifiers needs updating.

    [redacted] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laneysocial (talk • contribs) 16:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Put your contact information at Talk:Laney Amplification. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, Laneysocial. I'm not sure quite why Robert McClenon advised you to put your contact information on the talk page: I wouldn't advise you to put it anywhere in Wikipedia. What I would advise is that you read WP:PSCOI, and then put your suggestions for changes to the article on the talk page. Be as specific as you can (eg "Replace text 'XXXXXX' by 'YYYYY'"), and give reliable sources for all information - sources independent of your company where possible. For the logo, if you can give a URL where your new logo can be found, somebody can upload it and update the article. Finally, if you put {{edit request}} (with the double curly brackets) in your suggestions, it will add them to a list of waiting requests. --ColinFine (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: I have updated the logo per their website, but the user will need to suggest specific changes to the article, supported by sources, as outlined above. TimothyJosephWood 17:43, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I used sloppy language. I meant to put the corrected information on the talk page. Do not put contact information on Wikipedia. User:ColinFine is right as usual. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    adding photo

    We'd like to have this photo be in the upper right corner of our WIKI page - and we uploaded it but it does not appear. What do we do?

    error message attached - photo exists but we can't get it in place (Kids Castle Playground Cranberry Community Park)

    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cranberrytownshippa (talk • contribs)

    Hey Cranberrytownshippa. I have added the commons photo to the infobox, and moved the previous one down into the body of the article.
    However, you should note that your current name appears to be a violation of our username policy since names that represent an organization, or imply shared use are not allowed. You probably want to either request a change at Wikipedia:Changing username, or register a different account that complies with our policy. Your current account is liable to be blocked as a shared use violation if you do not. TimothyJosephWood 17:41, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) Hello, Cranberrytownshippa. I'm afraid there are several different problems here. Before I get to answering your specific question (which I will) I need to draw your attention to some other matters.
    First, it is not your Wiki page. It is a Wikipedia article about your town. You do not own it, you do not control its contents, and indeed you are strongly discouraged from editing the article, because you are likely to find it hard to be sufficiently neutral. Please see WP:PSCOI. If you are an employee or contractor, so that you are in any sense being paid to do this work, then you must declare this, according to the policy WP:PAID.
    Secondly, user names are not allowed which imply that they are being used for or by an organisation, or by several people. All Wikimedia accounts are required to be personal. That doesn't mean you have to use your own name, as I do: many accounts use a pseudonym of some sort. But it means that you should use an account personal to you, and if other colleagues want to edit, they should create their own personal accounts. Please see WP:USERNAME.
    Now to get to your specific question. You successfully uploaded commons:File:Kids Castle Playground in Cranberry Community Park.jpg, but you didn't edit Cranberry Township, Butler County, Pennsylvania to change the (image) file name from "Cranberry Mall parking lots and buildings.jpg" to "Kids Castle Playground in Cranberry Community Park.jpg" (I'm assuming that you meant you wanted to replace the image). You then attempted to upload it again, and got an error because that was a duplicate.
    Unfortunately, there are further problems here. First, it is not up to you to decide which picture is used in the article - that is part of the "neutral" bit I mentioned. You are welcome to suggest changes, but it is the consensus of uninvolved editors which will decide. More seriously, you have uploaded the picture saying "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:". Are you, the individual who uploaded that picture, personally the holder of that copyright? If you took the picture yourself, you probably are. If the photographer held the copyright and specifically transferred it to you personally, then you are. In any other case (including the case where the copyright is held by the town authorities) you do not not have the legal power to grant that licence as yourself. (I guess it's possible that it is held by the community and you hold an appointment which gives you authority to grant that licence, but even then, the statement I quoted from you above would be false).
    What needs to happen for that picture to be used - indeed, for it to remain on Wikimedia Commons - is that the actual legal holder of the copyright must specifically release it under an appropriate licence - either publicly, or in a communication to Wikimedia: see Donating copyright materials. If it is you, then you have done right, and I apologise for doubting you.
    I'm sorry that this has been long-winded and presented you with difficulties. I'm afraid this is a common experience, as very many people mistake Wikipedia for a promotional site. --ColinFine (talk) 17:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    FWIW, the image did not appear to exists anywhere else on the internet. Although it's not clear from where the image was taken without using a UAV. TimothyJosephWood 18:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please review 176.179.191.228's contribs

    I'm working and don't have a lot of time to review the contribs of User:176.179.191.228 but I do see that they're up to their same old tricks. Can some editor please check their contribs and possibly have them blocked again? Thanks, †dismas†|(talk) 23:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    February 1

    East Meadow, New York article

    The article on East Meadow, New York has gone under several disruptive edits in the past (such as the adding of unnotable persons and picture changes) Currently, instead of showing the location of the town in New York, it shows a map of the state of Washington. How does one change the map back?

    Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winnsley (talk • contribs) 00:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi User:Winnsley, I've reverted the recent vandalism. Thanks for pointing that out! – Juliancolton | Talk 00:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Winnsley. First thing, please try to remember to sign your talk page posts as explained in WP:TILDE. Signing your posts will making much easier for other editors to see who is posted and when they posted.
    Now regarding your question, the image has already been replaced so this is really just for your future reference in case it happens again. Go to the article's page and click on "View history" and try and find the edit which changed the map. This may be a little tricky if there is no edit sum and you may have to look at a couple of edits until you find it. When you do find the edit, click on "undo" to open the edit window. Scroll down to the bottom of the window and add an edit summary explaining why the change was made. An edit summary is very important and not adding one might me your edit will be reverted as an unexplained change. Something simple such as "Changing back to correct map" should be fine. After adding an edit summary, click "Show preview" to verify that the changes made are the ones you wanted to make. If everything is OK, scroll back down to the bottom of the page and click "Save changes". If you make a mistake, don't worry about it. You can try and fix it yourself or ask for help on the article's talk page.
    Finally, before you "undo" the other persons edit, try and make sure that you're only changing the map back and not undoing any other "improvements" the editor may have made to the article. Many editors often make lots of little changes as part of a single edit, and clicking "undo" will undo them all. Also, sometimes intermediate edits are made to the relevant content and the software will not let you undo the edit. In such cases, you may have to go in a simply manually replace the image yourself. You do that by clicking on "Edit", finding the file for the incorrect map, removing it, and then re-adding the file for the correct map. As before, click "Show preview" to check you edit and "Save changes" to save your edit. You can find out a little more on how to do this at Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    In this particular case there was some good luck, in that the vandalistic changes occurred only a bit more than an hour before the OP reported it. A revert would have fixed it, although I'm guessing the OP couldn't do that, not being autoconfirmed yet. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 05:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Is this OK?

    Is this OK?[1] (look at the before and after). before I make an issue of it I want to ask, is this allowed? I thought that formatting the page title like this [2] was weird but OK, but hiding the user name entirely? --Guy Macon (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Does that fall afoul of WP:SMI- CSS and other formatting codes that disrupt the Wikimedia interface, for example by preventing important links or controls from being easily seen or used, making text on the page hard to read or unreadable (other than by way of commenting out), or replacing the expected interface with a disruptive simulation, may be removed or remedied by any user...? Or some similar UPG. O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 06:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! I am going to try WP:BRD[3][4] and see whether I get an R. (If I do I will try D). --Guy Macon (talk) 07:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    You could have at least alerted me to this discussion. feminist 08:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    You see, the problem is that sometimes you simply don't know whether something is or is not disruptive. I am on the fence about this case, and wanted some advice before confronting you. That is also why I picked the least confrontational action I could think of (a bold edit, with an expected revert then discussion should you disagree) rather than potentially angering you with something like an ANI report. I reserve the right to seek council as to whether I am on the right path before alerting you and getting into a fight where I might very well be wrong. If you disagree, revert me and I will open up a discussion on your talk page. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah. I see that you reverted me with the edit comment "what a joke".[5] The revert is fine with me (WP:BRD). I will attempt to discuss this with you on your talk page (it may take a day or so to get to it). --Guy Macon (talk) 11:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It appears that User:Feminist decided against doing this and went back to a normal title. BTW, I don't think anyone would have had a problem with leaving the title all-lowercase; that's a minor bit of originality that doesn't violate any policy. --Guy Macon (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Reference check

    I want to known the page number and quotation from the book for Vestigial_response#Goose_bumps. How would I request that and who to approach? --IEditEncyclopedia (talk) 07:09, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • In such cases, you are usually out of luck. The best shot is to view the page history, find who added the reference, and contact them directly. When page history is long, you this tool is your friend but here, it is short enough to review manually. In that case, this edit by Joshua Issac added the link; let's see if they can help.
    Another option is to go ask at the appropriate reference desk, if you want more general information about a specific claim. TigraanClick here to contact me 11:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    You could try asking at WP:WRE - X201 (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I copied the reference from Goose bumps, to where it was added by JSquish. I assume that the relevant part in the book is from page 101 to page 103. --Joshua Issac (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created by cut and paste content from non copyright sources

    I have been around for a while but am really unsure how to handle this issue. A new editor, Susan Schneegans is creating articles which are solely, or mostly, cut and paste creations from copyright free UNESCO publications such as at Challenges for innovation in Malaysia. COPYVIO doesn't seem to apply since attribution is given, but it feels totally wrong; but I can't find the policy or guidance that constrains such action. I would welcome advice and suggestions. Thanks  Velella  Velella Talk   11:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • If the copyright is indeed compatible with Wikipedia's licensing requirements (note that some "free" licenses, e.g. CC-BY-NC, are not compatible), there is no policy or legal reason against copy-pasting en masse. However, the copied content may not be appropriate for inclusion - for instance, the link you gave seems to me to violate WP:NOTESSAY. And of course, repeated inclusion of such content disregarding any warnings would be construed as disruptive. TigraanClick here to contact me 11:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • This type of copying is allowed provided it is attributed (as is being done in this case). See Wikipedia:Plagiarism. However I personally think there should be text added to the body of the article saying something like "What follows has been extracted from a 2015 UNESCO report". Thincat (talk) 14:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi all, I'm Wikimedian in Residence at UNESCO and working with Susan Schneegans, who is a subject matter expert and wrote some of the publication that is being used, she has kindly agreed to work with me to share information from the report on Wikipedia. I also developed the template to make simple to add openly licensed text to Wikipedia which creates a credit for the report (see the Sources section). I wrote these instructions to make this process easier. My main motivation was to make it easier for experts to contribute to Wikipedia, either directly as Susan is doing, or indirectly through other editors adding text from sources written by experts. As Joshua Issac has said this is not a new approach to creating Wikipedia articles, we are simply expanding use of the technique. Please let me know if you have any suggestions on making this tool easier to use. Thanks--John Cummings (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Summaries at the top of the page when viewing on mobile

    Certain pages like Mithila, India and Mithila (region) have inccorect summaries at the top when viewing from a mobile or tablet. These don't appear when viewing the desktop version of the site. Is it possible to remove these since they are incorrect and unsourced? Thanks. Damien2016 (talk) 12:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Damien2016: They are on Wikidata, and can be edited by clicking the "Wikidata item" link in the sidebar and changing the description. Pppery 12:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the help!Damien2016 (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    VBV

    wHAT IS WIKIPEDDIA> ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.128.160.41 (talk) 13:39, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please see Wikipedia:Introduction. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Seriously? Go back to WP:RD/E, you freak. TigraanClick here to contact me 12:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Verify my own page

    How do i easily verify my own wikipedia information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.207.65.36 (talk) 16:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    What do you mean "verify"? On Wikipedia, we take verifiability to mean: can I find reliable sources that say the same thing that this Wikipedia article does. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedia is not Facebook or Instagram. Accounts or pages can't get a 'verified' status. Lyrda (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    If you mean Jed Armstrong then you need to establish the WP:Notability of the subject of that article by finding WP:Reliable sources that discuss this person in detail. If you are not able to do so, then the page will be deleted. In general, Wikipedia strongly discourages people from writing their own WP:Autobiographies here. Dbfirs 00:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I notice that entering "Jed Armstrong musician" in A Well known Search Engine throws up a few relevant sources, but probably not enough to verify much of the article's content. Archives of music journals (such as Melody Maker, New Musical Express and doubtless many others) may contain useful contemporary references – I wonder if the Musicians' Union (UK) (of which the OP is doubtless a member) could advise where such archives may be electronically or physically accessed. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 94.12.94.189 (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The article has now been deleted. Dbfirs 09:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Dabpage Never Gonna Dance Again

    Recently, the page Never Gonna Dance Again (Sugababes song) was merged to Change (Sugababes album) per consensus at Talk:Never Gonna Dance Again (Sugababes song). Meanwhile, Never Gonna Dance Again (song) was redirected to Careless Whisper. I was going to convert the dabpage to a redirect to the George Michael song. However, I read Talk:Never Gonna Dance Again and realized that the dabpage was the result of RFD, where I participated (I long forgot it). Shall I be bold and change the page anyway, or shall I do the AFD? --George Ho (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I'd like to use the 1920 Edition of Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities in the same manner that the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition and the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia both of which have Category:Encyclopedia source templates. The 1920 Edition is available in Google Books (https://books.google.com/books?id=1qoVAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover) but not at Wikisource. The 1879 (first) Edition is at Wikisource, so I'm not sure there would be any problem putting it there other than the work of copying the 1920 version from google books to wikisource. Does anyone have any suggestions as to where to get more specific information as to whether this is appropriate and whether copying to Wikisource is needed before going forward. I've worked with paraphrasing out of a number of editions both prior to 1923 and after (I own copies of 5 editions).Naraht (talk) 21:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Whether or not to put it in Wikisource is a Wikisource question, not a Wikipedia question, but I will be so bold as to answer here: Yes, it is appropriate. Whether to do it first: Yes, better to do it first, because you will then have a proper Wikisource target for your Wikipedia template. Paraphrasing is not needed and is often not even appropriate for out-of-copyright works: you should probably just directly quote the work, with attribution:See WP:Plagiarism. At Wikisource, you may (or may not) find the DNB project to be a more complete example than the 1911 project. -Arch dude (talk) 22:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Page move oddity

    I moved Cypress (provincial electoral district) to Cypress (former Alberta provincial electoral district) (because there are two others). I adjusted the links accordingly in three election templates, so I thought, but they're still showing the old link in Perren Baker. What gives? Clarityfiend (talk) 21:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    WP:PURGE may be what you're looking for. -- The Voidwalker Whispers 21:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I though exiting Firefox would do that, but I guess not. It's fine now. Thanks. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    February 2

    Referencing errors on Edhir Paradhathu

    Reference help requested. There is an error message in a Reference Archive URL on the page Edhir Paradhathu. The date of archive is not known. But the error message says archive date is required.

    This is the reference text:
    cite web|url=http://dff.nic.in/2011/2nd_nff_1955.pdf%7Ctitle=2nd National Film Awards|publisher=Directorate of Film Festivals|accessdate=23 August 2011|format=PDF|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303233325/http://dff.nic.in/2011/2nd_nff_1955.pdf

    Thank you to help me to resolve this. Thanks, --00:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)UKSharma3

    Uksharma3, I fixed it with this edit by adding the date that is in the web.archive.org URL, 3 March 2016. †dismas†|(talk) 00:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you. Now I learned how to find the archive date from the URL. --UKSharma3 01:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

    Contributions not reassigned after username change

    Hey, I was recently granted a username change but my contributions have not been reassigned from the old account to the new one. Wikipedia:Changing username says it can take a number of hours but it's been a number of days. Who can I talk to about this? Dscosson (talk) 03:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Dscosson: What was the old name? I couldn't find a rename for Dscosson. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Fleischer family

    max fleischer said to be born in krakau, 1883 - his brother david said to be born in new york 1884 - family said to have migrated to the usa 1879 - some inconsistency is all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.35.129 (talk) 08:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles say :- Max Fleischer, b. 1883, family emigrated 1887. Dave Fleischer, b. 1894 (not 1884). Eagleash (talk) 08:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Reviewing?

    Every now and then I receive a notification stating that an article I created God knows when "has been reviewed". I'm not on Wikipedia as much as I used to be, so...what does that mean? Erpert blah, blah, blah... 12:28, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hey Erpert. When a new article is created it gets added to a list of "unreviewed articles" that then get "reviewed" by a volunteer at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. These volunteers are checking to make sure that the new article doesn't meet criteria for speedy deletion or other deletion criteria, and make sure that, if it has specific problems, like no sources, no links from other articles, etc.. that those problems are either fixed or tagged for cleanup at a future date. Once an article is reviewed, it gets added to the pool of articles that are indexed by computer thingies (close enough), and can then be searched for using engines like Google. TimothyJosephWood 14:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Adding an external link to a page

    I need assistance in adding a link or reference source to a page and am unable to figure out how do to this can someone assist me ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crossways8 (talk • contribs) 13:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi! Can you share a link to your page so we can see what's going on? Thanks! --McDoobAU93 13:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Can I Use Images from Game Developer Website?

    Hi,

    I searched for the information about what images I could use on the Wikipedia page I am writing, but want to make sure I understand what I've read. I'm writing about a new mobile game and wanted to know if I could use the images of artwork, screenshots and icons from the developer's website on my Wikipedia page, or should I use my own screenshots from the game?

    Thanks, Lab Ratat (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi there! This page will give some details on how to use screenshots in articles on software. Since it's most likely showing copyrighted content, it would have to have a fair-use claim and proper attribution, as well. You can get information on that here. Hope that helps! --McDoobAU93 13:57, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    How does wikidata get put into articles?

    A general question, but here is an example - in the article TiddlyWiki, the infobox includes 'repository' and 'website' info but I can't find that info in the edit source text. I presume that this information is coming from wikidata (as I can find it there) but how does it get into the wikipedia article? According to Wikipedia:Wikidata, either a parser function or a lua module can be used, but I can't find either one in the TiddlyWiki article. Can someone explain? Leschnei (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Referencing errors on CafePress

    Reference help requested. I tried to add a citation pointing to the CafePress web site but it is black listed to prevent link spamming so I removed the "http://" and then I got an automated message from ReferenceBot telling me that the url is malformed. Don't know enough about citations to figure out a different way to add the text of the url without making it a link and thereby causing it to fail the blacklist check. Thanks, Andrew S. (talk) 14:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&oldid=763308769"