Jump to content

Talk:Climate change in Sweden

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Amina El Shazly (UU) (talk | contribs) at 16:18, 6 February 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnvironment: Climate change Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Climate change.
WikiProject iconSweden Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

hangon

The article has been put up for Afd. Without too much effort the article can be rescued. See the Afd for reasons to retain the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reasons to retain an article with no content on the Afd. There is no article to be rescued. It's an empty shell and has been for several months. I have nothing about the theoretical existence of such an article, it's just that there is no content. Stinging Swarm talk 08:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The speedy deletion nomination is different than the deletion discussion. The justification for speedy deletion would be "A7" here.--Stinging Swarm talk 08:20, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am working on the article as we speak. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Added Policy section. Hope it helps. Lauraserbu (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We are a group of students in Uppsala University nd we are going to start working on this article