Jump to content

Talk:Steve Inskeep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rickbolger (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 15 February 2017 (responding to suggestion that Inskeep's opinions "creep" into his reporting.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconRadio Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
To-do List:

Untitled

Criticism Inskeep has been criticised for crossing the line from journalist/anchor to political activism on Morning Edition. He has been accused of treating many conservative guests rudely and letting his own biases creep into his reporting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.240.0.44 (talk) 18:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

do you have any references? Pohick2 (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the above statement that Inskeep's biases "creep into his reporting." Fact is they FLOOD into his reporting. Here's a prime example; February 15 2017 "Lawmakers Call For Probe Into Flynn's Russian Communications" Senator Rand Paul suggested that it was time for Republicans to stop investigating Repbulicans, which Mr. Inskeep egregiously twisted into "Senator Rand Paul wants to put party ahead of country." Regardless of your point of view or opinion of Rand Paul, this is clearly not what the Senator said.