Jump to content

Talk:Commodification of nature

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kmbatt (talk | contribs) at 21:12, 15 February 2017 (Update POL 150C2-III assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnvironment Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized.
Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEconomics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kmbatt (article contribs).

Help formatting references

Have uploaded new page--major area of research in critical environmental geography. Could use help formatting references. --RedCorvus (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heidegger

Shouldn't Heidegger be mentioned in this article somewhere? Such as his famous essay The Question Concerning Technology? --18:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

The linked article mentions neither commodity or nature - although humans are part of nature. The Martin Heidegger article does state:
Heidegger's later work is especially notable for its important criticisms of technology's instrumentalist understanding in the Western tradition as "enframing," treating all of Nature as a "standing reserve" on call for human purposes.
So some of his work definitely looks at the commodification of nature. At any rate WP:BOLD and add a section. Jonpatterns (talk) 20:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I see you understand. I don't have time right now. But I wanted to alert people that Heidegger is very good on this subject and is probably one of the more important notable philosophers in talking about it in the 20th century. I think his view on it is a bit unique compared to a materialist like Marx. --David Tornheim (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]