Jump to content

User talk:165.234.184.52

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 172.58.40.79 (talk) at 18:39, 16 February 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 2008

Thank you for experimenting with the page Sloth on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to List of U.S. colleges and universities by endowment (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to List of U.S. colleges and universities by endowment constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 18:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Yogi Bear. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tnxman307 (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Miami Hurricanes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Miami Hurricanes was changed by 165.234.184.52 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-28T14:25:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Michigan Wolverines. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 14:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Indianapolis Colts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vary Talk 20:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Steve Prefontaine, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Steve Prefontaine was changed by 165.234.184.52 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-02-20T16:06:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sept. 09

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Vsmith (talk) 17:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Grand Forks County, North Dakota. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 15:52, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jared Allen, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jared Allen was changed by 165.234.184.52 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-02-08T18:00:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nick Collison has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to FOREST has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Depression. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
- Sarrus (ct) 19:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lithium sulfate ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Horry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -fnlayson (talk) 19:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of career achievements by Kobe Bryant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Chris!c/t 18:28, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of political parties in the United States with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trusilver 19:13, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Sharp. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 21:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cultural impact of Elvis Presley with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Life insurance. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jprg1966 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012

Hello, I'm 78.26. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Triangular trade because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 78.26 (talk) 19:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Linux Mint, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 15:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Linux Mint with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TBrandley (what's up) 15:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Linux Mint with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. TBrandley (what's up) 15:15, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Darkwind. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Fundamental Orders of Connecticut, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, —Darkwind (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fundamental Orders of Connecticut with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 19:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fundamental Orders of Connecticut with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —Darkwind (talk) 19:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Graphical user interface, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 15:31, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cavalier, North Dakota with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:French Revolution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Gilliam (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Σosthenes12 Talk 16:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Sharp, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Arikara people, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Widr (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Luke Sharp

Hello 165.234.184.52. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Luke Sharp.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Luke Sharp}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Endoplasmic reticulum because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ginsuloft (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Self-cleaning glass, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal talk 16:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Self-cleaning glass with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. — MusikAnimal talk 16:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cavalier, North Dakota with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — MusikAnimal talk 16:56, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dodge because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Types of motorcycles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Widr (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dodge, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Truancy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:47, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Google effect, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rosie the Riveter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Angie Dickinson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jocelyne Lamoureux with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rrburke (talk) 17:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jocelyne Lamoureux. Widr (talk) 17:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Minnow because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Critical thinking— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]