Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Grayfell (talk) 09:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Frayfell, Critiques of Subud don't exist, so, unfortunately, and ostensibly, no critiques of Subud are allowed on Wikipedia. That's a major snafu. There are no published criticisms of Subud. Authors who are members of Subud would never publish such material as (for the most part) they don't have the objectivity to stand back and criticize. Authors who are not members of Subud don't write about Subud because of lack of interest--lack of public interest and their own lack of personal interest. Again, it's a snafu. The question is, and yes I'll admit it's a bit of a loaded question: what about Wikipedia readers who are interested in the truth? Is it against Wikipedia policies to point from within the Wikipedia article to an outside source that criticizes Subud?
