Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

Skip to: Table of contents / current discussions / old business (bottom). Purge this page

WP:MFD

Please do not nominate your user page (or subpages of it) for deletion here. Instead, add {{db-userreq}} at the top of any such page you no longer wish to keep; an administrator will then delete the page. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for more information.

Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.

Filtered versions of the page are available at

Information on the process

What may be nominated for deletion here:

Pages not covered by other XFD venues, including pages in these namespaces: Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText:, MOS: (in the unlikely event it ever contains a page that is not a redirect or one of the 6 disambiguation pages) and the various Talk: namespaces
Userboxes, regardless of the namespace
Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XfD venue.

Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.

Before nominating a page for deletion

Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:

Deleting pages in your own userspace	If you want to have your own userpage or a draft you created deleted, there is no need to list it here; simply tag it with {{db-userreq}} or {{db-u1}} if it is a userpage, or {{db-author}} or {{db-g7}} if it is a draft. If you wish to clear your user talk page or sandbox, just blank it.
Duplications in draftspace?	Duplications in draftspace are usually satisfactorily fixed by redirection. If the material is in mainspace, redirect the draft to the article, or a section of the article. If multiple draft pages on the same topic have been created, tag them for merging. See WP:SRE.
Deleting pages in other people's userspace	Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding `{{subst:Uw-userpage}} ~~~~` to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using {{db-userreq}}. Take care not to bite newcomers – sometimes using the {{subst:welcome}} or {{subst:welcomeg}} template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first. Problematic userspace material is often addressed by the User pages guidelines including in some cases removal by any user or tagging to clarify the content or to prevent external search engine indexing. (Examples include copies of old, deleted, or disputed material, problematic drafts, promotional material, offensive material, inappropriate links, 'spoofing' of the MediaWiki interface, disruptive HTML, invitations or advocacy of disruption, certain kinds of images and image galleries, etc) If your concern relates to these areas consider these approaches as well, or instead of, deletion. User pages about Wikipedia-related matters by established users usually do not qualify for deletion. Articles that were recently deleted at AfD and then moved to userspace are generally not deleted unless they have lingered in userspace for an extended period of time without improvement to address the concerns that resulted in their deletion at AfD, or their content otherwise violates a global content policy such as our policies on Biographies of living persons that applies to any namespace.
Policies, guidelines and process pages	Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the policy as {{historical}} or redirecting it somewhere. Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors.
WikiProjects and their subpages	It is generally preferable that inactive WikiProjects not be deleted, but instead be marked as {{WikiProject status\|inactive}}, redirected to a relevant WikiProject, or changed to a task force of a parent WikiProject, unless the WikiProject was incompletely created or is entirely undesirable. WikiProjects that were never very active and which do not have substantial historical discussions (meaning multiple discussions over an extended period of time) on the project talk page should not be tagged as {{historical}}; reserve this tag for historically active projects that have, over time, been replaced by other processes or that contain substantial discussion (as defined above) of the organization of a significant area of Wikipedia. Before deletion of an inactive project with a founder or other formerly active members who are active elsewhere on Wikipedia, consider userfication. Notify the main WikiProject talk page when nominating any WikiProject subpage, in addition to standard notification of the page creator.
Alternatives to deletion	Normal editing that doesn't require the use of any administrator tools, such as merging the page into another page or renaming it, can often resolve problems. Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6\|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.
Alternatives to MfD	Speedy deletion If the page clearly satisfies a "general" or "user" speedy deletion criterion, tag it with the appropriate template. Be sure to read the entire criterion, as some do not apply in the user space.

Please familiarize yourself with the following policies

Wikipedia:Deletion policy – our deletion policy that describes how we delete things by consensus
Wikipedia:Deletion process – our guidelines on how to list anything for deletion
Wikipedia:Guide to deletion – a how-to guide whose protocols on discussion format and shorthands also apply here
Wikipedia:Project namespace – our guidelines on "Wikipedia" namespace pages
Wikipedia:User page – our guidelines on user pages and user subpages
Wikipedia:Userboxes – our guideline on userboxes

How to list pages for deletion

Shortcut

WP:MFDHOWTO

Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:

Instructions on listing pages for deletion:

To list a page for deletion, follow this three-step process: (replace PageName with the name of the page, including its namespace, to be deleted)

Note: Users must be logged in to complete step II. An unregistered user who wishes to nominate a page for deletion should complete step I and post their reasoning on Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion with a notification to a registered user to complete the process.

I.

Edit PageName:

Enter the following text at the top of the page you are listing for deletion:

{{mfd|1={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}}}
for a second or subsequent nomination use {{mfdx|2nd}}

or

{{mfd|GroupName}}
if nominating several similar related pages in an umbrella nomination. Choose a suitable name as GroupName and use it on each page.

If the nomination is for a userbox or similarly transcluded page, use {{subst:mfd-inline}} so as to not mess up the formatting for the userbox.

Use {{subst:mfd-inline|GroupName}} for a group nomination of several related userboxes or similarly transcluded pages.

Please include in the edit summary the phrase
Added MfD nomination at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replace PageName with the name of the page that is up for deletion.
Please don't mark your edit summary as a minor edit.
Check the "Watch this page" box if you would like to follow the page in your watchlist. This may help you to notice if your MfD tag is removed by someone.
Save the page

II.

Create its MfD subpage.

The resulting MfD box at the top of the page should contain the link "this page's entry"

Click that link to open the page's deletion discussion page.
Insert this text:

{{subst:mfd2| pg={{subst:#titleparts:{{subst:PAGENAME}}||2}}| text=Reason why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~
replacing Reason... with your reasons why the page should be deleted and sign the page. Do not substitute the pagename, as this will occur automatically.

Consider checking "Watch this page" to follow the progress of the debate.
Please use an edit summary such as Creating deletion discussion page for [[PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
If appropriate, inform members of the most relevant WikiProjects through one or more "deletion sorting lists". Then add a {{subst:delsort|<topic>|<signature>}} template to the nomination, to insert a note that this has been done.
Save the page.

III.

Add a line to MfD.

Follow this edit link and at the top of the list add a line:

{{subst:mfd3| pg=PageName}}
Put the page's name in place of "PageName".

Include the discussion page's name in your edit summary like
Added [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the page you are proposing for deletion.
Save the page.
If nominating a page that has been nominated before, use the page's name in place of "PageName" and add

{{priorxfd|PageName}}
in the nominated page deletion discussion area to link to the previous discussions and then save the page using an edit summary such as
Added [[Template:priorxfd]] to link to prior discussions.

If nominating a page from someone else's userspace, notify them on their main talk page.
For other pages, while not required, it is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the miscellany that you are nominating. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the page and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter or Wikipedia Page History Statistics. For your convenience, you may add
{{subst:mfd notice|PageName}} ~~~~
to their talk page in the "edit source" section, replacing PageName with the pagename. Please use an edit summary such as
Notice of deletion discussion at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName]]
replacing PageName with the name of the nomination page you are proposing for deletion.
If the user has not edited in a while, consider sending the user an email to notify them about the MfD if the MfD concerns their user pages.
If you are nominating a WikiProject, please post a notice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council, in addition to the project's talk page and the talk pages of the founder and active members.

Administrator instructions

XFD backlog
V	Nov	Total
CfD	19	19
TfD	4	4
MfD	0	6
FfD	13	13
RfD	58	58
AfD	0	0

Administrator instructions for closing and relisting discussions can be found here.

Archived discussions

A list of archived discussions can be located at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Archived debates.

Current discussions

Pages currently being considered are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section.

February 20, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Aurelio Hevia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Aurelio Hevia

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Unreferenced, single-line stubs on non-notable individuals that have been lying stale for a long time. 103.6.159.84 (talk) 06:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand notable people, needing work, and not in mainspace. Some a few lines, some a single line for now. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all - Reasonable drafts within the userspace of an active contributor. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. RAN has suggested that some may be moved to Wikidata, if he so chooses that is fine, but currently work in progress. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep all. Worthy drafts. Historic figures. There are no time limits. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:10, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Angela Devi/Archive 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per CSD G8. Graham87 08:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Angela Devi/Archive 1

Orphaned archived talk pages of an article that was deleted in 2015. Serves no informational purpose. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball} 05:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 19, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ZLEA/Anti-Vandalism Corps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete, user agreed. NAC. — Train2104 (t • c) 16:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:ZLEA/Anti-Vandalism Corps

One users' own WP:CVU clone, with the twist that the member's are "soldiers" and they are their "director" with the ability to promote and demote their soldiers. This is contrary to the spirit of how Wikipedia works and encourages an unhealthy militaristic mindset when dealing with new users and new pages. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ I had no idea that a "militaristic mindset when dealing with new users and new pages" was wrong, so I will do my best to make sure this doesn't happen again (I got rid of it in AVC too). But, if there is a problem with AVC being a "clone" of CVU, than I will understand why it was deleted. - ZLEA ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 22:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you have created a project in your userspace that is apparently run according to you rules, when we already have a perfectly good project that does the same thing and is run by consnesus as it should be. A lot of people have worked for a very long time to build CVU and make sure it works properly and doesn't encourage it's particpants to assume bad faith. This project looks like basically the opposite of that. I can't see what possible purpose it could serve and believe its very structure is antithetical to the Wikipedia ethos. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd never encourage to assume bad faith, I strongly agree in assuming good faith. - ZLEA ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 13:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete But I do see your other point. - ZLEA ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 13:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Way too aggressive for this project. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Richard Keatley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Richard Keatley

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmitted 2 times with no convincing changes so there's nothing to accept in both our standards and policies, which say enough. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The promotional tone could be fixed, but lacks substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources, offered or to be found. Looks unlikely to qualify on academic notability grounds. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Matt Holmes (entrepreneur)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedied. In light of the author's statement below that "I regret creating" the article, and the lack of other substantial contributors, we can treat this as a G7. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Matt Holmes (entrepreneur)

Advert (created by paid editor) for non-notable small businessman who happens to hold an obscure world record. Orange Mike | Talk 00:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not see any indication that this article would have any chance of surviving AfD. It looks like the author is trying to use an obscure record (BLP1E) to shoehorn a promotional article into Wikipedia that talks about the subject's various, minor, business interests. Jbh ^Talk 01:31, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Defendable G11. Promotion. Every bit of it. Would need to be entirely rewritten if somehow notability were demonstrated. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I regret creating it. —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Full disclosure. It is the subject of a long ANI. I don't know if there is some value of archival record. I don't want to be accused of contributing to the destruction of evidence. I am not versed in these matters.—አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 01:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no evidence would be destroyed. Any admin can still retrieve the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Anchorage, Alaska/Census debate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete I can't see any use in the suggested redirecting, both the content and the edit history of these edits are already preserved. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Anchorage, Alaska/Census debate

This page was created in 2005 as a subpage of Talk:Anchorage, Alaska to fork off a particular contentious discussion which occurred the year before. I'm to understand that the practice of such subpages is long deprecated. The only edit made to this page was to create the page; the content has been moved to Talk:Anchorage, Alaska/Archive 1 and the history of the individual edits still resides at the main talk page. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:20, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Talk:Anchorage, Alaska/Archive 1 as {{R from merge}}, {{R from subpage}}, and {{R with old history}}. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 16:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 18, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TheValentineBros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheValentineBros

Use of Wikipedia as webhost. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 18:20, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:2.187.121.98/Enter your new article name here

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:09, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:2.187.121.98/Enter your new article name here

abandoned draft with dead link Auric talk 15:17, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Aïn arnat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to mainspace article ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aïn arnat

Unneeded draft. It is simply a copy of the existing article Aïn Arnat. Whpq (talk) 14:25, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. WP:ATD. Come to MfD if there is a reaction, but note that this is extremely unlikely. DraftSpace is stuffed with unneeded drafts, please don't bring them all here. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Steveneu/Reedman World Auto Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Steveneu/Reedman World Auto Center

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Six-year-old abandoned article. No hope for the topic (a local auto dealership) and the ONLY edit, ever by the editor. Calton | Talk 06:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replace contents with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}, or {{Userpage blanked}} if you want to imply inappropriate. Unworthy of mfd. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. wwe delete advertising, not just blank it. DGG ( talk ) 06:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 17, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TUSHAR KARMARKAR

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:TUSHAR KARMARKAR

User pages that look like articles are prohibited UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

kick it to draft there seem to be some CIR issues with this editor, so it might be worth kicking it to draft and someone with patience can try to help them develop it. Primefac (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: - This article has previously been deleted due to the subject being non-notable. Sending it to draft would just impede the inevitable deletion. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I haven't really looked to see if it's worth keeping, so if it's overall delete-worthy then by all means boot it. Primefac (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Josh Littlejohn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per no participation herein other than from the nominator.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Josh Littlejohn

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3 reviews and still unconvincing for our main policies especially ones involving business as the information and sources are still too business advertising. SwisterTwister talk 23:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ajay Data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per no participation herein other than from the nominator.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ajay Data

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closely suggestive of advertising as the information and sources show and the sources are either clearly labeled advertising or not quite open about it, there's simply nothing for our policies since the history shows no serious attempts at satisfying the applicable policies, the last resubmitting happened exactly after the 2nd review which labeled the concerns. SwisterTwister talk 20:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chris Obi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Note that the delete !vote at the end of the discussion, stating that the "current state doesn't satisfy wp:NBIO" is not particularly valid to qualify deletion of the page, because topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles. See WP:NEXIST for more information. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chris Obi

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twice reviewed now in 1 day and yet no actual changes or anything to suggest convincing in our essential policies; sources, as shown are simply advertising. SwisterTwister talk 04:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The author may not have provided any sources you consider reliable, but the quickest of googles clearly shows Chris Obi is definitely notable. Feel free to keep declining the draft until you think it is ready (a process that may be expedited with providing the author with more feedback than "Not satisfying our basic policies", for instance, telling them their current sources are advertising as you have informed us here), but I don't think we should delete drafts for subjects that should have articles. A2soup (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What currently exists here is a clear violation of WP:NOT, our main policy for articles and what we use for such matters, so even though there's sourcing, none of it supports a policy-based notable article. SwisterTwister talk 02:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Advise the author, Melisewilliams (talk · contribs), to edit existing articles first. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Certainly notable. Provide useful help / show how it's done. To a new editor, the decline reason reads like gobbledygook. Lyrda (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How so? It helps to show since 2 reviews showed no improvements and I'm not sure how "Not satisfying our basic policies" couldn't be any clearer since that's exactly what our own policy pages say for subjects. Not only has this been confirmed as a paid advertisement (as history shows), but the current improvements even now are simply bare URLs to PR announcements, mentions and similar = Not what establishes an acceptable article. SwisterTwister talk 03:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is about the topic, not the article. The draft was declined because it's in a poor state. That's easy enough to mend. Lyrda (talk) 11:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is so much wrong here. The subject looks notable, good. The author, Melisewilliams (talk · contribs), has never edited any other article, made a userpage, posted a message, bad. The author has never been welcomed, bad (just done now). The draft has an unused talk page, bad. The AfC instructions have sort of been followed, but the efforts have been rewarded with perfunctory templated messages on top of the article, extremely unintuitive as to how to be responded to. Now to see SwisterTwister write "couldn't be any clearer", when the totality of correspondence looks like monkeys barking at each other across great distances, and SwisterTwister's tortured English only barely comprehensible, and references to "our basic policies" simply not including sufficient detail to be meaningful. The entire AfC thing should be shut down. It is a waste of so much time on so many people's part, with such a low rate of quality output. My advice to Melisewilliams is to follow the hits found by the search https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&search=%22Chris+Obi%22&fulltext=Search and to spend some time improving the content there, including redlinks to Chris Obi, and only after that, if the redlinks stick, to attempt to create a non-WP:Orphan article directly in mainspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete current state doesn't satisfy wp:NBIO Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 05:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Notability is about the topic, not the current state of the article let alone a draft. Lyrda (talk) 10:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note The creator has started a new article Chris Obi in mainspace again, consisting of a single sentence.[1] -Lyrda (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Prince Pipes & Fittings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Prince Pipes & Fittings

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twice reviewed in 1 day with no significant changes with heavy emphasis in PR thus unconvincing in our policies. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jeffrey Thompson Sr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete-- as a WP:G5 hoax. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jeffrey Thompson Sr.

No such person exists as Jeffrey Thompson, Jr. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:18, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jeffrey Thompson, Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete as a blatant hoax per WP:G5 . — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:49, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jeffrey Thompson, Jr.

No such person exists. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mungkorn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: move and blank. Move to User:Mungkorn/Sanook and blank with {{inactive userpage blanked}}. Though I could suppress the redirect, I'll allow its creation and convert it to a soft redirect, with no prejudice against its deletion per G6 if any of the participants here think that is appropriate. (non-admin closure) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 11:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mungkorn

Stale article draft, dating from Sept 2008. Slightly promotional, tho it could perhaps have been rescued ... but after this much time, this minimally-sourced draft is not a useful base to build on. The website http://www.sanook.com/ still exists, and it may be notable (I have not checked), but if anyone wants to write an article on it, they will do better to to start from scratch. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 06:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move to User:Mungkorn/Sanook and replace contents with {{Inactive userpage blanked}}. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- That sounds fine. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks! I think the topic and drafted content is good enough to make it findable to someone searching all Wikipedia namespaces, and was never offensive enough (violating something at WP:NOT) to require deletion. Re-titling will make it turn up on a search for "sanook", and blanking is appropriate for old dubious (out of date?) content. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TechDayHQ/sandbox/TechDay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete G11. User blocked. NAC. — Train2104 (t • c) 20:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:TechDayHQ/sandbox/TechDay

Clear company advertising in which WP:NOT applies alone, given we're not a business webhost. SwisterTwister talk 02:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and allow some time for the main contributor to make more improvements. After the draft was AfC declined as reading like an advertisement on 10 February 2017 (diff), the author made proactive efforts to address the matter on 16 February 2017‎ (diff) and then resubmitted the draft (diff). After this, on 17 February, rather than addressing the matter via typical AfC procedures (e.g. such as declining again and providing a rationale), this was instead simply nominated for deletion here (diff). See also WP:BITE. As a sidenote, it's unclear if the primary author is affiliated with the company or simply chose the company's name as a user name out of personal interest. I have notified the primary author on their talk page that their user name presents a conflict of interest (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 16, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RobertCrip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:RobertCrip

Fails WP:UP and WP:NOTWEBHOST DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 07:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Forced Change - While he does seem to make his user page not serious as to not be confused with an actual article, it still falls under WP:FAKEARTICLE. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 15, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Max Life Insurance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Max Life Insurance

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 11:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still advertising after 2 reviews with no assurances of satisfying policies. SwisterTwister talk 21:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve. Looks like a notable company. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 18:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be surprised if this is actually improved. DGG ( talk ) 08:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, this is Deletion 101: The current state of the article is not reason for deletion since it can easily be corrected by editing. I did some cleanup. This thing has >8,400 employees and >5B USD assets so this is not an advert for something run on one's basement. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 21:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The author posted the same version of this draft in the mainspace which I have requested for speedly deleted and this search result shows multiple users tried to create article about the same subject and some of them are blocked. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. based on the current article and the information about the previous versions. DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 11:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable company. The state of the article reflects the failure of the AFC process, not the topic. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kerry Lee Crawford

~~Duplicate of Kerry Lee Crawford. Created by same user, so no attribution issues.~~ P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace article was speedy deleted, and previously deleted as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Lee Crawford. I still think the draft article should be deleted as well, no need to keep a draft of a topic that will not become an article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering how I can delete it too after experimenting on it!Khaled Abolaynain (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Khaled Abolaynain, as you are the only author, discounting the bot edit is definitely ok, you can tag it with {{db-g7}}. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for the notice. 21:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Khaled Abolaynain (talk)

~~Redirect to Kerry Lee Crawford~~. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Struck my !vote above, because the main namespace article was deleted. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cup eperiment ( I'm a kid)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Snowy Delete - no chance will become a fork of the articles listed below. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cup eperiment ( I'm a kid)

Very intereresting: but basically nonsense. Unencyclopaedic, WP:NOT, etc. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 16:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The content is not actually nonsense, and the subject-matter is encyclopedic in theory (to the extent the result the article describes is one the author found surprising, see Geometrical-optical illusions), but obviously the presentation is not in a suitable form. This is probably a speedy candidate. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Yes, per WP:Not. I think the proper link for the not-nonsense is Piaget's theory of cognitive development#Concrete operational stage though. Debouch (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry; I used the word 'nonsense' in the vernacular rather than our specific definition of the word. Nonsense as in: pointlessness that has no place here in that form. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 21:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, but I must admit it has great humour value. The conclusion is a profound philosophical revelation. Laurdecl ^talk 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 14, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Becoming Assiya - The Story of the Children of War

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Becoming Assiya - The Story of the Children of War

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Either self-advertising or clear hired help because there's clearly heavy activities here, none of which have actually improved the article for our policies. Article also has copypaste. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The current state of the draft is irrelevant. Lyrda (talk) 22:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How is that satisfying our policies, especially when it's a clear advertisement? Our policies actually state articles must be either deleted or improved to qualify acceptance. SwisterTwister talk 23:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Video Games articles by quality statistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete - bot capitalization error. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Video Games articles by quality statistics

I don't know what this is for. It has no incoming links, and has never been edited since its creation. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A single edit by a bot. No content. Likely a mistake. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. G6-cleanup really. Could ask from wikiproject that was running the bot, what this is for. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 18:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Video game articles by quality statistics per WP:CHEAP. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 13, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rowde/Theodore TR1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rowde/Theodore TR1

An abandoned user space 'draft' created by editor currently blocked. A page for Theodore TR1 currently exists as a redirect. Eagleash (talk) 23:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – The only actual contribution to the page was the addition of the name "Theodore TR1" on 19 May 2016‎ (link), which is how it still reads. All edits after that were maintenance, addition of a csd template and then the removal of the template, and this nomination. An article already exists at Theodore Racing. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kelvin morka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kelvin morka

Unconvincing in our policies. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Declined 3 times, no prospect of an article. DGG ( talk ) 08:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly not an candidate for an article. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 22:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Leena Mohanty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Leena Mohanty

This is a clear Facebook-esque profile and no improvements have been made PR shown to suggest it,c# acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 22:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Zimdars' fake news list

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep/withdrawn per nominator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Zimdars' fake news list

We have taken the personal opinions of Melissa Zimdars, associate professor of communications at Merrimack College[2], and enshrined them as a sub page off of our identifying reliable sources page. I see no reason why we should allow this while not allowing subpages off of our identifying reliable sources page enshrining the opinions of Scott Shackford,[3] Chelsea Schilling,[http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/meet-leftist-prof-who-wrote-hit-list-of-fake-news-sites/] Shawn Hannity,[4] Kira Davis,[5] Ethan Barton,[6] or Samantha Chang?[7] Could someone please explain to me why their opinions aren't just a good (and just as bad) as the opinion of Melissa Zimdars and just as worthy (and just as unworthy) of an identifying reliable sources subpage? Guy Macon (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Guy Macon: We seem to be having the exact same discussion in 2 places at once. Should I just repeat the same comments here or do you want to centralize this discussion at one location? Kaldari (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion on the article talk page is about improving the article, in this case by adding sections for all of the biased, unreliable sources listed above.

This discussion is about deleting the page or moving it someplace where it isn't a subpage to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep, mark it as an essay (done). Useful resource. We "enshrine" (via "see also") lots of essays of people with even less credentials. We have it because this list was released under Creative Commons, so we can copy it and format in the form convenient for us. Moreover, we can also edit it, if we decide that some entries are wrong. The opinions of other people are just as good, and if they release them under CC, we can just the same use them here. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write "enshrine". I wrote "enshrine as a sub page off of our identifying reliable sources page". I would have no problem if this was in one of the usual places where we keep essays. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to User:Kaldari/Zimdars' fake news list or move to Wikipedia:Zimdars' fake news list. An essay shouldn't reside on the subpage of a content guideline. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 21:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Standalone essay (first choice) or userfy (second choice) or works for me. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Standalone essay is fine with me, although I still think we should link to it from WP:NEWSORG so that people can find it. Kaldari (talk) 23:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appropriate essay. DGG ( talk ) 08:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG:I am surprised that you think that it is appropriate in its current location. Would you object to other opinions/essays being added as subpages to Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources? --Guy Macon (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am pretty much sure that location is a non-issue now. Once everybody agreed it is OK to have it as an essay, moving it to a standard location is a pure technical moment nobody will oppose. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as an essay, which was tagged as such by another user after this was nominated for deletion (diff). Note that I moved the link on the WP:RS page to the Essays section in its See also section (diff). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appropriate ProjectSpace work. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. This will only become more important and probably should eventually be upgraded to something more officially WP:PAG. jps (talk) 14:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but move it out of the IRS namespace. $ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it.$ 22:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone object to me withdrawing this AfD and moving the following three pages to become stand-alone essays (Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Zimdars' fake news list to Wikipedia:/Zimdars' fake news list and so forth)?
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Zimdars' fake news list
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/List of reasons why Zimdars' fake news list is itself "fake" -->
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/List of reasons why the list of reasons why Zimdars' fake news list is itself "fake" is fake

--Guy Macon (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, so I am WP:BOLDLY making the moves. If nobody reverts, this MfD may be closed as withdrawn. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Volunteer Marek/Evidence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Unlike the similar Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EtienneDolet/Evidence discussion below, this page is not linked in any ArbCom or AE case (so there is no reason to move it to a subpage). The owner has agreed to deletion below. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Volunteer Marek/Evidence

Delete per WP:POLEMIC; old stuff from an old case. Drmies (talk) 03:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just blank it? Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, that doesn't count because many people would want to keep their polemics blanked (edit to add point poking opponent, then blank page, repeat indefinitely). Please add {{db-user}} to the page. Johnuniq (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me just save the text to my computer (some of those jokes were funny!) Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, do I need to add {{db-user}} or can you just delete it since it's here at MfD? Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:16, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just add db-user and forget about it. Someone will delete the page in due course. That is the cleanest procedure because the deleting admin does not have to wonder what to write for an edit summary since a simple "db-user" is both self-explanatory and verifiable (by admins who can see the history of the deleted page). Johnuniq (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blank at least. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 12, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Miguel Angel Virgen Corp.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Miguel Angel Virgen Corp.

Clear advertising and no attempts have been made to satisfy our policies. SwisterTwister talk 23:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EtienneDolet/Evidence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: move without redirect. Salient points were made about the need to preserve evidence for future cases, and Tiptoetheutheminefield is right in saying that we don't usually delete subpages of ANI or ArbCom cases. However, it is also true that we shouldn't have laundry lists of perceived wrongs hanging around in userspace per WP:POLEMIC. Therefore, I have moved the page without a redirect to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive197/EtienneDolet evidence. That way, the evidence is preserved and linked to only in context, so it can be referred to in future discussions if needed, but is not so public and easy to find. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:EtienneDolet/Evidence

Please delete per WP:POLEMIC--Etienne, you can always stick a WP:G7 tag on this. Drmies (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it should be kept because it has been cited (and linked to) in a past ANI case [8] as evidence, and nobody is suggesting it contains sanctionably inaccurate claims. If at the time, rather than placing it in a separate page, ED had just pasted the content into the ANI case, nobody would now be suggesting that this content should be deleted. However, I think a lesson is that ANI case evidence should not be presented in this way. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Blank at least. Assuming the troubles are dealt with. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Things are rarely completely "dealt with". Administrators constantly bring up past cases as reasons to criticize or sanction editors and new ANI cases often refer back to old ones. So any editor perusing past ANI cases needs to be able to view all evidence presented in those past cases. My position is not specific to this page, it would be the same for any proposed deletion of any page that has been presented or cited as case evidence and which does not contain material which breaks Wikipedia rules. Would blanking still allow the content to be viewable through the page's edit history? Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bring it to a head at some WP:DR forum within a week or take it offsite. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per Drmies - Regardless of where its been used it doesn't belong here pure and simple, If you want to submit evidence than either do so or keep it off-wiki, As the page has been here since August 2016 it's obviously not going to be used for anything, Better off deleted. –Davey2010^Talk 00:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Asserting that something should be a particular way because it is "pure and simple" it should be is a rather empty argument to present. The page was uses, it was submitted as evidence, it is currently linked to in a past ANI discussion. Saying it's "not going to be used for anything" could be said about every closed case or dead discussion that now exists essentially as an archival record of what happened - that is not a reason to delete things. You don't delete archival material regardless of personal opinions about its importance or usefulness. This is the wider principle at stake here. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information related to others without very good reason. It is pretty simple. Establish the very good reason or take it away. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you advocate the deletion of ANI cases related to individuals once they are closed? No such policy or practice exists and would require a major policy change decided elsewhere (not something a miscellany for deletion discussion can do). Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. Archived ANI threads are stored in an appropriate context, archived alongside hundreds of other silly short term grievances. A stand alone userpage is quite different. It can but pulled up completely out of context. If the page was central to an ArbCom case, I recommend moving it without redirect to a subpage of the case, and leaving its long term fate to the discretion of the Arbs and their clerks. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd failed to spot that so my apologies but still regardless of whether it's being used/linked or not it still doesn't belong here, I would have no issues with anyone updating the Arb page saying it's been deleted but in short if kept it would mean this would have to be kept pretty much forever and that could set a precedent for those who too want to keep their evidence - I guess you could say it'd be a loophole for some, Anyway many evidences in userspaces have been deleted and I don't see why that shouldn't be the case here regardless of it being used/linked or not. –Davey2010^Talk 17:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, or merge, and redirect, per SmokeyJoe (not good to keep out of context a stand alone page about a editor's behaviour as seen by another editor) - Nabla (talk) 13:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vpvpvpvp04/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vpvpvpvp04/sandbox

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, referring to WP:Alternative outlets. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:King 100 James

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:King 100 James

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Jannat kay pattay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jannat kay pattay

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. Full of personal opinion and original research. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brent Freeman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Brent Freeman

Promotion of a non-notable subject: WP:NOTCV. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 12:49, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:LilPe$oo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:LilPe$oo

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:DeMarco Altezz Krawford

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DeMarco Altezz Krawford

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yep, another non-U5able U5 ;) O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 12:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kaplan Assignment on Wiki and Bloggers as marketing tools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kaplan Assignment on Wiki and Bloggers as marketing tools

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Let's not give spammers any ideas. MER-C 08:44, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The story of abeloth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The story of abeloth

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The cold one

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The cold one

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Mix race chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mix race chart

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:The greatest discovery in science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The greatest discovery in science

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Uses of eggs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Uses of eggs

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete U5 too I would've said. Cheers, O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 11:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:U5 only applies to pages in user namespace. So, I nominated the page here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm, it's an interesting distinction isn't it? Cheers! O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 11:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kristie McNeil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kristie McNeil

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:46, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:My Life in My Words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:My Life in My Words

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Northamerica1000: I've rev/deleted almost all of it as obvious copyvio from here. Doug Weller talk 11:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Communication Lessons from the 2016 US Elections

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Communication Lessons from the 2016 US Elections

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ghost Corruption

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ghost Corruption

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Balazs Szaloky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Balazs Szaloky

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Free Speech On College Campuses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Free Speech On College Campuses

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:How He Proof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:How He Proof

Qualifies for deletion per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Yesterdaying What Over Tourt & Proof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yesterdaying What Over Tourt & Proof

Qualifies for deletion per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Elcoin the ethereum based cryptographic e currency has started

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elcoin the ethereum based cryptographic e currency has started

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:What is my Strength

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:What is my Strength

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Media and the Mental Health of Women

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Media and the Mental Health of Women

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Checkmarx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Checkmarx

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 06:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Still unchanged in 2 reviews in the last week and the sources are still too focused as announcements but, not only this, but also the fact the company is still young (past 10 years) so there's simply no better substance beyond it; article has continued with a PR emphasis. SwisterTwister talk 06:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the page three times adding more citations from reliable sources including WSJ, CBS News and TechCrunch. All are original pieces by these sources that are focused on the article's subject. Also, CatcherStorm has given some criteria for approval and I have provided those sources. The fact that the company is young is not a sufficient criteria for deletion. It has shown to be notable in its field on multiple levels and over time. אגם רפאלי (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 06:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:A. D. James Holdings, LLC.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:A. D. James Holdings, LLC.

The article in main namespace was deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. D. James Holdings, LLC., and this qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST, because Wikipedia is not for the indefinite storage of drafts about non-notable topics. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the clear consensus at AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Old business

Everything below this point is old business; the 7-day review period that began 20:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC) ended today on 3 December 2024. Editors may continue to add comments until the discussion is closed but they should keep in mind that the discussion below this marker may be closed at any time without further notice. Discussions that have already been closed will be removed from the page automatically by Legobot and need no further action.

February 12, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of AfDs opened today

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete, User:Lourdes has altered the user script so it doesn't link here anymore. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:List of AfDs opened today

This only transcludes another page, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today already exists and this is not linked from anywhere, so no indication this is useful. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hi Champ, this page is used in User:Lourdes/AfDstarted.js, a script that is listed at WP:AFD for quick access to Afds that have opened today ("Alternative scripts are available for viewing all deletion discussions^[1] or those opened^[2] or closing^[3] today."). It doesn't transclude Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today; rather, it builds the list itself by taking the current date and month etc, because the page builds a particular presentation style. I would prefer keeping this page (because it has a particular presentation style made to ease reading for the script's users). Lourdes 04:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lourdes: (ec) I would prefer you move this to user space rather than it remaining in project space if it is kept, because if it serves no other purpose than as part of that script, there is no point of it remaining in the project space. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure. Just delete it then. I wouldn't prefer a public script to link to a personal user space. When people use such public scripts, I don't think they would prefer seeing a personal user page of an editor providing a list. No problems. I'll do a workaround and use the log page itself.. Thanks. Lourdes 05:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, allow User:Lourdes to use it or not, on his decision. This should have been discussed with him before bringing it here, use of ProjectSpace in developing scripts for general use is perfectly fine. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect as duplicate. Ppp ery 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:OmarGosh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:OmarGosh

Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST. The article in main namespace was deleted per the discussion and strong consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmarGosh. Wikipedia is not a web host to indefinitely store content about non-notable subjects. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This encyclopedia is WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTPROMO for this 14-yo "internet personality" or any other non-notable subject. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 11, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jj0928

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jj0928

Abuse of userspace. Looks like KuhnstylePro or Brightify material, but username is similiar to the first identified sock of the long-inactive "Windows XP vandal". KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a hoax / webhost violation. -- Whpq (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Airline Cabin Crew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Massive, massive violation of WP:WEBHOST. User is clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. I'm going to treat this MfD as including all their books, even the ones created after it was posted. There is no sense having a separate discussion for them. I'd be inclined to be slightly more forgiving if half the books didn't include the name, address, and contact info of the Dhaewood aviation school, but they do, so I'm also going to block the user indefinitely for massive violation of WP:PROMO. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mass nomination of all books added by User:Dhaewood

208 pages

User:Dhaewood/Books/TRAVEL,TOURISM,TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS MGT m1 BY DAWODU GABRIEL, IATA CERTIFIED CONSULTANT,CHIEF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT @ DHAEWOOD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL,LAGOS NIGERIA. 08026272323,08035050692 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User:Dhaewood/Books/TRAVEL,TOURISM,TRANSPORT & LOGISTICS MGT m2 BY DAWODU GABRIEL, IATA CERTIFIED CONSULTANT,CHIEF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT @ DHAEWOOD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOOL,LAGOS NIGERIA. 08026272323,08035050692 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Mass nomination of all books added by Dhaewood (talk · contribs) - appears to be using Wikipedia books as a web hosting service, user has no mainspace edits. Would nominate for U5 if there weren't so many... — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NO! NO! NO! We are not using wikipeida for web hosting service, we have a training school, students are usually directed to come online and read materials put together by instructors,this has help them a lot as most do not know how to search for relevant topics on WikipediaDhaewood (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dhaewood: That is not what Wikipedia is used for at all. I have no idea how someone can't figure out how to search for relevant topics on Wikipedia, as the search bar is plainly visible on any page, and most people can figure out right away that a blue word links to another relevant article. Also, you're using your own Wikipedia space for hosting your own original content; that sounds like using it as a webhost to me. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think i get you guys right here, all topics were suggested by wikipedia,we do not have any original content we do not edit or violate any rule or regulation, our website www.dhaewoodgroup.com do not appear in any of the write ups, this is an example of topics put together for students, AIRLINES STUDIES BY DAWODU GABRIEL, IATA CERTIFIED CONSULTANT

   Airline
   Airline codes
   Airline alliance
   List of airline holding companies
   List of charter airlines
   List of low-cost airlines
   List of passenger airlines
   List of regional airlines
   European Low Fares Airline Association
   Oneworld
   SkyTeam
   Star Alliance
   Flag carrier
   Airline liveries and logos
   World's largest airlines
   Airline bankruptcies in the United States
   List of airlines
   List of accidents and incidents involving commercial aircraft
   List of airline mergers and acquisitions
   List of defunct airlines
   American Airlines
   United Airlines
   US Airways
   British Airways
   Qantas
   Delta Air Lines
   Singapore Airlines,,,,,,

if you feel we have violated any rule or regulation just make it explicit, we will correct them asap , thank you all.... Dhaewood (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please use our sister project Wikiversity for that purpose, rather than Wikipedia. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The user has created two additional books (1, 2) since the opening of this discussion. I'll leave it up to the closing admin as to whether or not to consider them for deletion along with the original 208. I'm inclined to suggest blocking for WP:NOTHERE as well, though this is obviously the wrong venue for that. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And 2 more (3, 4) — Train2104 (t • c) 12:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

February 10, 2017

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Years

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Years

Unused and broken portal, literally nothing has happened here since 2014. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I fixed the broken aspects of the portal layout. Regarding the notion of the portal being "unused", this is not the case. The portal has actually received 286 page views in the last thirty days as of this post. Leave it in place for other users to improve. There is no deadline. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I have expanded the portal a bit by editing its subpages. Lots of potential here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep improvements have been made by Northamerica1000 and there is plenty of potential. Lepricavark (talk) 21:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:22.999.323.231

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:22.999.323.231

Talk page for impossible IP. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just noise, but not sure if it's worth spending time at MFD for harmless ones like this. If there are many such, might be better handled via a bot. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Closed discussions

For archived Miscellany for deletion debates see the MfD Archives.

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates